Sunday, April 05, 2009

Visions for a Sustainable Future

by Hardy F. Schloer, President and Managing Director, Schloer Consulting Group



The world, as we know it, is changing. Not that this is something new and unusual, because change is the essential definition of time: as time passes in our reality, change naturally must occur. Throughout history change has often been relatively gradual. No less often, however, temporal shifts occurred suddenly and with extraordinary consequences. The violent collapse of empires, natural disasters of epic proportions, or the emergence of disruptive technologies such as man-made nuclear reactions are some examples that readily come to mind.

Such sudden changes cause a radical reorganization of perception in all of those whose reality becomes affected. The current global financial crisis is a good case in point. Greed and euphoria transition into fear and then into depressed resignation. Prestigious values of yesterday suddenly become the ostracized and scorned concepts of today. The neighbor that was an envied financial fund manager suddenly becomes a scoundrel. Even the memory of our own actions and thoughts becomes very short as we begin to exist in a new value and reality experience. Human psychology, particularly that of collective groups, changes in a heartbeat when ‘critical mass’ is reached.

So why is this so important to understand? Because the current shift in psychological reality is so unusual, so profound, and so rare that it will be a major subject for the history books, perhaps equal to the emergence and use of nuclear weapons in the last century, or the realization, a few centuries before, that our planet is not flat, but round and circling the sun. Nevertheless, because several important shifts are now occurring simultaneously, they are creating a perfect time storm, so that current and future human actions will be radically affected. Nation-states have been on the move, for the past 20 years, to realign their orientations, associations, and dogmas. At an increasingly fast pace, old countries and empires are collapsing, and new societies and nations are born. Unfortunately, ethnic cleansing, torture, social and political injustice, oppressive commercial competition and irresponsible behavior have also become more frequent in this process of change. As historical transitions took some 50 to 100 years to unfold in past millennia, in modern times, due to effective communication and other technologies, this shift is occurring much faster and more dangerously.

Perhaps at no other time in history were national and global leaders more challenged than now to find the right path to a sustainable future. The world has become unprecedentedly complex and complicated. The effectiveness and speed of modern communication technologies and public media allow local and global leaders little time to catch their breath and think carefully about their decisions. Momentous decisions must be made almost instantaneously, in realtime, often with unforeseen, devastating consequences for humanity. This speed escalation and volume explosion of flawed political, environmental and economical decision-making has begun to produce an avalanche of global instability and uncontrolled change that leads to more turmoil and confusion at all levels.

But the condition just described is only the ‘background radiation’ of this perfect storm of time and reality. There are several other, and equally troublesome, changes that compound this precarious global condition even further. For example, the lack of clean and affordable energy, the diminishing supply of clean water, the imminent global collapse of protein and, soon carbohydrate, food supply to a vastly expanding human population, the fast growth of pollution due to the increasing industrialization of developing nations, climate change issues, and the absolute impasse of philosophical and conceptional differences, all of these are factors that decision makers are called upon to accept as reality and, therefore, find solutions to. The unequal ability of many societies, nations or communities to compete for resources and affordable solutions is an additional dimension of intensifying conflict.

Yet, the news is not all bad, as there are some good ways to overcome this bleak scenario. In the last two decades alone we, the global community, have made tremendous progress in devising new, environmentally responsible technologies, and novel methods of applying traditional technologies, so that it is entirely possible to solve most, if not all the challenges, of the present epoch. However, we must act now, and we must be willing to implement and use those new tools in an intelligent manner. We must set aside all dogmatic beliefs and ideologies, and begin to embrace our differences rather than fight with each other over their validity.

We must refocus and look at the world as a homogeneous, functioning system. This is as true for political and economical realities, as it is true for science, technology and education. The world in all its facets must become transdisciplinary and intercultural. Studies of problems, decisions, and implementations of policy must be done from an integrated and transformative global partnership and as such, from the viewpoint of global consciousness. We must begin to understand that the insistence on buying a very low priced T-shirt in a Washington mall will cause someone else on this planet to work for wages below the poverty level. We must consciously realize that the CO gases of a factory somewhere in India or China will make breathing the air even more unbearable, and some day impossible, say, in Southern California. We must understand that any form of war and aggression towards another nation, group or society must become a concept of the past; now more than ever we need a global community of cooperation and intercultural arrangement and mutual respect.

The relentlessly aggressive political and administrative behavior and the emergence of potentially dangerous and disruptive technologies have seemingly and extensively outpaced human development, to the detriment of global intelligence, ethics, and the responsibility and willingness to cooperate on all levels, everywhere and anytime. Perhaps, it was fine to be irresponsible, destructive and hostile in ages where we had bow and arrows to settle the questions of emerging superiority. However, in the age of nuclear power and other harmful technologies and concepts, this line of behavior cannot continue without devastating consequences for all involved.

We must not only become educated about the consequences of our decisions, but also begin to understand the complicated interrelations and hidden dependencies of global reality. This, however, requires, in our age of fast moving realities, a much more committed approach and willingness to investigate and understand the issues on hand across all ideologies, philosophies, societies, and nations. We are also forced by the speed of today’s life to understand the most complex problems and find answers to them in real time.

One of the premier flaws in our current response to this critical global transition is that we are much too reluctant to use advanced information technologies to make important decisions. It is not that they are never used in this scope of application, but the technologies that are used are often much too simplistic as models of conceptualization and computation, mostly resulting in simplistic linear computational ‘thinking’ that fails the test of time in producing useful results. Naturally, they are then used as prime examples by all technology opponents to argue why they should not be used and why we should choose the ‘old ways of conservative and none-adaptive decision making’. For example, I was told by a major insurance company that they were still using the same FORTRAN risk-management program that they had developed some 35 years ago, when most of the risks that could wipe out any major insurance company today are completely different from those of three decades ago.

And yet, very powerful new models of artificial intelligence have emerged in the last decade that could bring true value to automated and computer-assisted knowledge development and complex real-time decision-making. The Quantum Relation Technology is only one such example that must be considered by global decision makers. Such technologies are still rather expensive, as they require very powerful supercomputers with complex and clinical data collection systems, together with hybrid real-time network infrastructures. But the question is: can we afford, with the emergence of so many local and global problems, not to use them? The answer should be obvious.

There is other good news, in addition to the availability of advanced decision-making technologies. All branches of science and technology have advanced dramatically in recent years. Biology, physics, chemistry and medicine lead the progress side by side with information and communication technologies. We have all the tools at our fingertips to change this planet to a sustainable community. But we must no longer look at partial patchworks of fixes, and begin thinking in terms of interrelated and integrated technological strategies to fix the errors of the modern age of industrialization and globalization.

The Schloer Consulting Group is committed to helping bring this kind of intelligent change to the global community, striving for a cooperative, transdisciplinary and intercultural problem-solving on both local and global levels.

Finally, we, the global community must become a transdisciplinary and intercultural real-time learning organization that is willing to make the adjustments and vital changes for a sustainable future. One indispensable step toward this goal is to embrace science and technology as tools for our higher, ethical development, instead of abusing them for destructive, competitive, and greedy or selfish purposes.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

How China, A Rising World Power Deals with the Current Crisis and Challenges Facing the World

By Professor Xinhua Zhang
The Center for Policy and Strategic Studies of Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences
And
Shanghai Vision Consultants Co., Ltd.
SCG Think Tank

Keynote: International Security Conference, Munich, Germany, February 2009

Current Global Crisis and Challenges (PowerPoint Text and Speech)

Having the future of humankind in mind, we have to be aware that we are facing several closely interrelated and interlinked major challenges:

1. Sustainable development of the world economy as threatened by the volatility of financial markets, due to the prevailing short-term profit interest of share-holder value attitude bestowing the capital markets with a casino character.

2. Intensifying scarcity of natural resources, especially the scarcity of fossil energy supply, which is of crucial importance for the transformation-process to a sustainable economy not only because of the risks of global warming, but also the finiteness of fossil energy resources, especially of oil and gas, in the last decades being the main energy-supplier for economic prosperity.

3. Severe situation of environmental destruction and increasing climate change, which is forcing us within the next two decades to set a new course to develop a global economy dramatically dematerialized by introducing resource-efficient technologies and more immaterial-oriented life-styles.

4. Social justice and actual and potential conflicts for survival triggered off due to the scarcity of natural resources and worsening of some social stratus and groups on the global level, which accompany the processes of urban agglomeration to result in a Planet Slum. The spread of terrorism is one of the manifestations.

To sum up, we are facing growing complexity, acceleration and uncertainties. Consequently, whenever we try to elaborate on perspectives and visions of the world of tomorrow, we will have to exploit all our knowledge and ingenuity combined with trans-disciplinary efforts to develop scenarios giving substance and inspiration to the public debate and the decision-makers.

Hence sustainable social and economic development and political stability asking for good governance from local especially urban to global level will constitute a crucial challenge to the world community, including business (corporate) community, the prospects for this endeavour not looking favourable in view of the broad variety of conflict potentials and the deterioration of state authority and governance. Much will depend on the willingness and ability of the old and new big powers jointly facing these risk factors to agree to a multi-polar conflict-management and multi-lateral co-operation.

In this regard, it is a good question to ask: How China, a rising, or emerging world power, or in other words, a global player, deals with the current crisis and challenges facing the world?

A Brief Profile about China’s Overall Situation and Challenges

China’s Achievements as a Global Player


China is a typical large country with comparatively low reserve of natural resources, and is standing in the middle spot of steps of population redoubling with the greatest base and the highest speed of growth.

As an accepted emerging world power, or global player, China has maintained good house-keeping function and has good performance in handling its own affairs and makes progress each day for its own social and economic development. At the same time, China has also impressed the international community by resuming responsibility for global affairs and contributing comparatively largely to international stability and global development (economic and business development).

China’s Foundations of Development

Until 2008, the basic lifeline of Chinese economy has mainly depended on two foundations: one is high national saving; The other is the traditional model of extensive development and incentive foreign trade policy, coupled with the system of compulsory foreign exchange. Now China owns a reserve of over $ 2 trillion of foreign exchange and in equal terms issues about 12 trillion Yuan.

The above two foundations make it possible for China to establish the most active mechanism of capital accumulation without wars and developed its capital markets. Moreover, in recent years, main commercial banks have gone public across boundaries and completed the benign operation of the accumulation system. This "deposit-credit system ", combined with export-oriented economy, reflects a special structure in which China accumulates wealth by investment driving economic growth and relying on international markets, and also shows the weakness of Chinese credit sources and the underdevelopment of its growth mode leading to the vulnerability of its economic and ecological systems. Adding to this is the corruption of civil servants which accompanies high growth rate and institutional flaws.

Threats and Challenges Facing China

Many have rightly pointed out that, in short run, problems of ecology and environment have become the most protruding challenges to sustain China’s economic development; in longer run, ecological deficit and resource scarcity as well as the accompanying social problems increasingly extend to pose the greatest threat to future survival of the economy and the stability of the society.

This situation has naturally brought to attention the issue of sustainability, which questions whether China can sustain its development and maintain high growth rate in both short and longer terms and whether China can successfully handle the transition to a more open, stable and equitable society.

The new situation, especially the unfolding global crisis and challenges pushes China to embark on a new road of unprecedented and far-reaching revolution in its institutions and policies, as well as business governance and development..

In the following, I present some of my reflections to the questionraised by the organizer of this conference from three challenge areas: the unfolding global financial crisis, the issue of energy and climate change, and food.

Chinese Approach to Tackle the Global Financial Crisis

Performance of China’s Economic Wellbeing under the Global Financial Crisis

The special features of the present global financial crisis: ………

Assessing Impacts of Global Financial Crisis on China

In general, the Global financial crisis has so far had comparatively minor impacts on China. Chinese financial firms have bought small amount of American sub-prime lending products, although some of them increases certain commercial risk because of having bought bonds issued by investment banks of Wall Street. Moreover, data shows that China is the greatest holder of American government bonds in the world. But in total the Chinese sovereignty foundation has not fallen into the trap. Therefore, Chinese government does not have to worry too much about this issue in the near future.

But the indirect impacts should not be overlooked. As others China stands to suffer from the adverse consequences of any US recession, even though China’s economic growth has become more broad-based and more resilient than in the past. In the short run, it will not be easy for China to boost domestic demand to offset the unfavourable external disturbances. If the expected US recession is mild and short-lived, it could provide “some welcome cooling agent to the hot Chinese economy”. However, China, like other economies, cannot escape unscathed from a prolonged and severe US recession. So from the macroeconomic perspective, China’s economic cycle has obviously left the gold growth phase of “high growth and low inflation”, evidences of deflation and economic setback are emerging on the horizon.

  • Recent downside catastrophe of the stock exchange market
  • Decreasing consumer confidence and gloomy expectance on the economy, bringing about the down-sliding trend of real estate business (investment and sale)
  • Serious setback and difficulties of China’s export business, resulting in huge employment in export related companies and some foreign investment companies
  • Weakening market demand and difficulties in business operation and performance deterioration indicating macro economy cooling down, growth of Chinese economy slowing and entering a downward trend
Prospects of China Getting out of the Crisis

Despite of the above difficulties, generally speaking, the growth trend of Chinese economy will not change. Its prospects look still promising, although the pace will be slowed down in some mild way. The rationale includes the following:
  • The difficulties Chinese economy is faced with are the ones inherent in the processes of advancing. China has rode onto the speed track of economic growth based on real economic fundamentals. It has experienced substantial productivity gains during its recent spurt of high growth, which lays foundation for new spurs.
  • China does not have to worry about new investment projects and new growth points. China’s industrialization and urbanization is just in the middle of the course. China is now one of the countries with income below middle level, and its urbanization and industrialization require a large amount of investments in infrastructures.
  • China’s position as the world’s manufacture base will not change. It is hard to find a country in the world which has very excellent chains and manufacturing bases to serve the world market.
  • Having a large economic volume with rather good quality and remaining intact substantially in the face of global turbulence, Chinese economy is less vulnerable to the crisis. Thanks to the immensity of its territory and different economic development phases, China has more and larger rooms for the central government to solve financial difficulties and spread crisis.
  • Increasingly mature macro-regulation measures provide for continuously rapidly developing economy with important guarantees.
The present situation in China testifies my viewpoints. The Chinese premier Wen Jiabao said last week in London that there have appeared signs of Chinese economy beginning to recover.

Then, how China achieved all these?

China’s Approach to Tackle the Global Financial Crisis: The New Policy

In China these days people do not used the U.S. term “bailout”. The measures adopted by the Chinese government to face the financial crisis are referred to as China’s “New Policy” because it has more significance than tackling the financial crisis. It heralds a kind of revolution in China’s state governance.

Basic Design of the “New Policy”

The Chinese “New Policy” is designed to bypass the global financial crisis and provide the new type of locomotive in the global economy. Therefore, the key of the New Policy is to manage to transform from export-oriented economy to the greatest economic system mainly relying on domestic demands, and as one of the key strategic aims, to restructure the economy for all round sustainable development in social and economic fields.

Strategic Objectives of the “New Policy”

Therefore, the Strategic Objectives of the “New Policy” are, in short term, to countermeasure the global financial crisis, and in longer term, to create new areas and new points of growth and new market opportunities for both domestic and foreign companies. For the implementation of the “New Policy”, the Chinese Central government has decided to spend 4 trillion Yuan in the coming years. 10 concrete measures have been conceived to put into reality the “New Policy” right away. The local governments have all decided to raise and motivate large amount of capital on their own to supplement the central budget and have made plans to implement the “New Policy”.

Key Components of the “New Policy”

1. By implementing active financial policy and expanding government expenditure to strengthen fixed assets investment in order to stimulate economic growth and ensure stable level of employment. Plenty of projects have been planned for infrastructural construction: railway, airports, urban development & municipal construction, large scale national and regional projects like major water transfer projects, etc., including agricultural and rural development. The all round development of the central and western part, is also one of the key areas of support. Education and R&D is also included for heavy investment.

2. By reducing export tax and giving subsidiaries to export oriented companies to stimulate exportation in order to stabilize employment and expand foreign demand. This measure is being applied especially to small and medium size textile and electronic companies that export to foreign markets.

3. Resorting to financial and tax measures to maintain and support the real estate business, keeping it from further sliding down, is one of the priorities. Two main policy instruments have been used. One is to purchase houses from the developers using public fund and allocate the houses to weak groups and people at marginal state. Another is to reduce loan interest rate at high percentage in order to encourage citizens to buy houses for their own use.

4. Expanding and stimulating all round domestic consumption by all means, including increasing the citizens’ income, delivering purchasing vouches to the households, increasing the level of subsidiary for weak groups, raising financial budget for people’s welfare expenditure, and cultivating new hot points of consumption (3G mobile phone and new generation household appliances).

5. By inputting large amount of public investment and initiating reform in resource price and taxation, to restructure the economy and up-grade the various sectors in order to generate new points of industrial development (energy sector) and technological breakthroughs (counter-measures against climate change). In the fields of economic restructuring and changing of modes of growth (alternative energy, bio-technology, environment protection, food and food-safety, etc. ), ample rooms are being opened for developing new points of growth. For instance, Shanghai plans to spend 10 billion US dollars in the next years to develop environment technology and protect environment (counter-measuring climate change, CDM business).

6. Education and R&D.

7. Most importantly, from my point of view, is to start up the “New Land Reform” and speed up the process of urbanization with strategic goals of expanding domestic demand and revitalizing a large amount of rural assets and liberating rural social productive force. We discuss this last point separately in some details in the following.

The “New Land Reform”

The goal of the “New Land Reform” includes integrating the development of urban areas with the rural and, and re-creating the rural productive forces. Taking the collective use right of land as catalyst, it provides large amount of money liquidity and wealth interests, promoting the formation of the greatest market of domestic demand and quantum increasing the purchasing power and consumption capacity of the Chinese society.

Turning farmer’s assets into capital, the Chinese domestic demand system will be lifted dramatically. Through paths such as mortgage and guarantee, rural immovable property system is open to financing channels, and at least it requires credit of 5-6 trillion Yuan. If it directly goes into the consumption market, theoretically it will increase the domestic demand capacity of about 1 trillion Yuan per year. The opening of the domestic demand system will ensure the economy to enter a summit phase in Chinese history.


The Bedrock of the “New Policies” and the “New Land Reform”: Properly handling State Regulation (Macro Control) and Repairing Systemic and Institutional Flaws

Strategically speaking, what China is doing to tackle the global crisis and challenges is to initiate an anti-cyclical crisis restoration approach by creating a new development cycle domestically, enlarging production in a large scale, which means high growth, high employment and moderate inflation. and building up of a modern credit system in China.

To successfully implement this approach, China must repair the flaws of its economic system. Moreover, these kinds of flaws are developing comparing with international economy. In fact, the mechanism which produces the flaws is more dangerous than the flaws themselves. In this regard, I think the most urgent thing to do is to increase credit resources and start up credit revolution.

It is obvious that the existing Chinese credit resources are insufficient. If they continue to lend most of them, China will not be able to deal with possible large adjustment of domestic asset prices. So the monetary policy has to be tight according to the traditional credit mechanism.

If we reconstruct in a round way the Chinese credit sources and its credit expanding capacity in combination of the modern money market and capital market with traditional deposit system, then the Chinese credit resources will certainly be over 45 trillion Yuan, and its credit capacity theoretically can increase to about 100 trillion Yuan, thus Chinese economy need not to cut the feet to fit the shoes.

Therefore, from strategic perspective, we argue that expending Chinese credit resources becomes the dimensional boundary to re-create Chinese economic development. The New land reform can release huge resources. If these resources can go into circulation and become a new element of the capital market, the problem of Chinese credit resources will certainly be improved to produce a strong economic entity looking down upon the world.

Difficulties and Challenges for Implementing Macro Economic Controls in China

(1) Uncertainties are increasing obviously, so is the difficulty of macroscopic decision-making. Efforts to stabilize market and price are complicated, and therefore, inflation and deflation could appear in turns in the future.

(2) A large amount of capital is likely to flow out of Asia, influencing the balance and configuration of the capital market.

(3) “Market salvation” actions with different intents are likely to cause a new exchange rate war.

(4) Risk factors are apparent, endogenetic and allogenetic elements are accumulating and coupling, which is watchful.


The Chinese government has adopted institutional tools (that is, macro controls) to have eluded the exacerbation and extension of crises for many times. In these processes much risk has been accumulated. Until now many of the factors solving crises were domestic, and in most cases through making worse domestic industrial and social conditions, anti-market measures, to relax or postpone the effects of external factors. While eluding crises one after another, the greatest cost is accumulation and enhancing of a number of internal risk factors. (such as bubbles in some fields, credit crisis, vacancy of efficiency, distortion of market functions, dissimilation of governmental functions, exacerbation of ecological environment, and aggravation of social inequality). In the context of the global financial crisis, external risk factors are beginning to dominate. Whether China can manage to deal with the crisis through more active, wider and stronger institutional measures is worth studying.

China’s Energy Security and Climate Change Actions

Major Problems and Challenges Facing China in Its Energy Arena


To understand China’s energy situation, future prospect and its strategic options of safeguarding energy security, one must first get a better understanding of the problems and challenges which China faces in the fields of energy consumption and supply during the process of social and economic development and transformation. According to my observation the following five aspects constitute the major challenges or problems of China in its energy arena.

Problems with China’s Mode of Production and Model of Development.

1. First, the problem with China’s mode of production and model of development. So far China has been promoting industrialization quickly while maintaining the traditional and backward agricultural mode of production with focus on large quantity and extensive coverage, clearly showing the characteristics of exchanging manual labor for resources and leading to the low efficiency of comprehensive use of energy, extremely high energy consumption per unit of production and severe pollution of the environment. It has become an accepted fact that China is one of the largest energy consumers as well as one of the major polluting agents of the world. This has also become the consensus among Chinese elites and the general public.

Serious Imbalance between Energy Demand and Supply

2. Second, the serious imbalance between energy demand and supply under the above mode of development. The consequences and implications of the above economic features of China’s development on the arena of energy is the large gap between China’s energy reserves and supply and its development demand, which is increasing alarmingly for a country standing in the middle spot of steps of population redoubling with the greatest base and the highest speed of growth. Fortunately, the Chinese leadership and the general public have all been aware of this situation and have had a sober and realistic comprehension of this challenge.

Unquenchible Thirsty for the Consumption of High Quality Energy Products Brought About by Reform and Opening-up

3. Third, the unquenchable thirsty for the consumption of high quality energy products brought about by reform and opening-up. There has appeared in China a severe mis-matching and contradiction between the structure of energy consumption brought about by the development of an affluent society and the domestic energy reserves and production capacity, making the short supply of oil and gas to exasperate and become a sensitive and explosive problem in China’s social development.

The first 20 years of this century is an important period of strategic opportunity for China’s economic and social development. Realizing the goal of building up an affluent society, Chinese economy will increase by 4 times by 2020. By that time the Chinese per capita GDP will exceed $ 10,000 in terms of PPP. According to international experience, this period is vital to the realization of industrialization as well as transformations of economic structure, urbanization process and structures of consumption of citizens. This greatly increases demand for high-quality energy (natural gas and petrol oil products).

In China, urban energy consumption is turning to gas, further increasing the demand for fossil-based natural reserves. Another fact is that China is entering into a car society, which increases greatly the demand for gasoline. All this shows that the security of petrol oil supply is at stake. Due to its importance as a key source of energy for national planning and people’s daily life, the degree of safe supply of this kind of energy has become one of the keys of China’s energy security strategy.

The above three problems together show that energy and environment problems have become the most protruding challenges to sustain China’s economic and social development. In longer run, the present mode of development, the high consumption of energy, resource scarcity, ecological deficits, as well as the accompanying social problems has naturally brought to attention the issue of sustainability, which questions whether China can sustain its development and maintain high growth rate in both short and longer terms and whether China can successfully handle the transition to a more open, stable and equitable society.

International Dimension of China’s Energy Issues

4. Fourth, the international dimension of China’s energy issues. Judging China’s energy situation from the perspectives of its international repercussions, we can see that the continuous economic growth and the ever-increasing demands for energy pushed by social development has greatly increased China’s dependence on imported energy, which is putting China under greater economic and political pressures from abroad. The new version of “China Threat ” just results from wrongly criticizing the energy situation and prospects of China.

Challenges and Problems Associated with Geo-economics/geopolitics and Energy Diplomacy

5. Fifth, challenges and problems associated with geo-economics / geopolitics and energy diplomacy. The Chinese energy diplomacy is meeting numbers of variables and rigid challenges of geopolitics / geo-economics, making energy security the core of China’s national foreign policy and strategy in the 21th century.

Energy is a special goods dyed with political colours and the 21st century is a century characteristic of energy competition. China will surely be challenged and influenced by various geopolitical powers and non-market factors. China’s energy diplomacy will meet with unprecedented pressures.

The above five problems combined together upgrades the issue of energy security to the most important problem of national security strategy, which has become one of the most pressing issues on the agenda of Chinese leadership.

Framework of China’s Energy Strategy

The traditional wisdom of the Chinese nation thinks highly of a pair of complementary concepts: increase income (including exploiting new resources) and reduce expenditure (including saving and reservation). I argue that the main thought line of China’s energy strategy should centre on these two orientations. Actually China’s energy strategy framework is just centre around these two concepts, some of the aspects of which are explained in the following.

“Reducing Consumption” by Way of Market Reform Oriented towards Sustainable Development

1. First, the basic stand of the strategy is market reform oriented towards sustainable development, the focus of which is on transformation of the mode (or pattern) of economic growth and model of social development by way of “reducing expenditure”. So the new strategy strives to update technologies through market mechanisms in order to solve the problem of energy demand and supply. Energy technology can be regarded as breakthroughs of the 6th industrial revolution and energy related sectors can become a new economic growth point and a new opportunity for Chinese business development. In order to reach the above aim, China is taking both legislative and administrative measures to build up an energy-saving economy and medium consumption society.

Thoughtfully Adjusting and Optimizing Energy Consumption Structures

2. Second, to meet the dual objectives of longer perspective development of energy bases and every day safe supply, China is thoughtfully adjusting and optimizing its energy structures. The present stance is to centre on coal as the main source of energy supply and rely on electricity as the chief supplier of the secondary energy source. For electricity development and production, the strategy is to transit gradually and actively to the use of alternative energies, such as wind, water, solar, tide, and nuclear as the primary sources. That is to say, operationally, China is focusing on the development of a secondary energy system with the renewable as primary energy, and reasonably collocating the primary and secondary energy systems to build a national supply system with electricity as the backbone. This strategy aims at relaxing demand-supply conflicts and thus establishing a sustainable state-level long-term supply framework. This is the combination of increasing income and reducing expenditure.

The medium and long development strategy is to focus on energy saving, greatly promote low carbon economy, including nuclear energy, water electricity, wind energy, natural gas, clean utilization of coal. First, we will focus on increasing quality rather than expanding production in coal industry, radically settling the coal security. Second, electricity production focuses on medium and long-term projects, quickening the adjustment of electricity price. Third, the production of natural gas will be a industry with strong demand for a long time, and we still determine the demand by relying on supply.

Parallel Development of Two Markets and Two Sources, the International and the Domestic

3. Third, from the vantage point of exploiting sources, that is to increase income, China’s new strategy puts more emphasis on the parallel development of two markets and two sources, the international and the domestic. While mainly relying on the exploitation and development of domestic resources, China has started to participate actively in international cooperation for energy development. There are two major areas of endeavour, one being the multi-directionary energy diplomacy, the other being getting involved in international option trades for fuel products by way of giving play to the mechanism of oil financing.

By energy diplomacy, we mean to enhance a nation’s safe supply of oil though diplomatic measures. Energy security is assuming a more and more important position in China’s foreign policy making. China’s energy diplomacy first attracted the world’s attention when the story of China competing with Japan for Russian oil field exploitation was made open. We should honestly say that China has the right and all the reasons to assume its position in the world’s energy strategic geography. This position can be ensured only when China actively engages in energy diplomacy and cooperate and compete with other international partners or competitors. This is also to meet the requirements of coordinating international relations at the age of energy crisis and competition. The degree of China’s dependence on foreign energy import will remain high for quite a period of time. Frictions and conflicts are surely to emerge during this period, for the resolution of which, energy diplomacy can serve as kind of lubricating oil.

Developing and Implementing a National Strategy for Alternative Energy Exploitation (R&D in Renewable Energy Development)

4. Fourth, China has developed and implementing a national strategy for alternative, or renewable, energy exploitation, the long term focuses of which are developing coal liquefying technology and hydrogen technology.

In order to decrease the dependence on imported energy, China is drawing its map of energy territory and drafting its road map towards alternative energies. Taking into consideration of different conditions in different regions and localities, wind power, solar energy, geo-thermo energy, tide, and nuclear power, are being developed as alternative energy sources. A national strategic framework with apparent Chinese characteristics for alternative energy development has taken shape. The longer-term objective is to partly substitute fossil energies (fuels). The short-term objective is to satisfy energy needs of the vast rural areas and remote regions for the construction of an all round comfortable society. We can predict that in the next 20 years China’s alternative energy exploitation will assume rather large scale, laying a solid foundation for China to transit into a more fossil energy free society. In this regard, the long term focuses of efforts are developing coal liquefying technology and hydrogen technology, which are highlighted as the strategic emphasis of the 21st century.

SAIC will invest 2000 million Yuan in R&D of new energy cars. The public company and controlling shareholders have established a venture: Jie Nen company, to develop new driving technologies. State will subsidize the purchase of new energy vehicles. The distribution and application project of large-scale industrialization of new energy auto, based on small demonstrations, will be promoted to the fields such as public transportation, taxi, city administrations and post services in selected 10 large cities. 90% of them are auto with hybrid energy. Supported by state policies, we try to have 60000 vehicles with new energy by 2012.

Combustible ice, hydrate of natural gas, is one of new-type clean energy in century 21. Recent studies show that it exists in north slope of China South Sea, trough of Spratly Islands, and slope of East Sea. Together with other institutions, Guangzhou Energy Institute of CAS has begun to study the three-dimensional experimentation simulation technology of combustible ice. This means that China has made a key progress in the field.

Developing Energy Industry with Focuses on Alternative Energies as the Key Emphasis of National Economic Development

5. Fifth, to develop energy industry with focuses on renewable and alternative energies is the only long-term strategy for China in this regard. For countries with high consumption of energy like China and in the context of oil price reaching its peak, it is a necessary path to invest in energy industry. China now is short of large-scale investment project of Trillions Yuan like this, so to develop a similar investment plan is a feasible way to respond to the economic cycle. From the perspective of businesses and local economy, currently some provinces of China have developed solar energy, wind energy and water electricity to some degree as a breakthrough point for local governments to find new economic growth points.

Actively Incorporating Energy Strategy with Its Commitment to Cut Pollutant Emission and Protect the Environment

6. Sixth and finally, China is actively incorporating its energy strategy with its commitment to cut pollutant emission and protect the environment. China has set the goal during 11th Five-Year Plan: the energy consumption of 10000 Yuan GDP will be reduced by 20% and the pollution by 10%. After rapid growth for many years, it seems that Chinese energy consumption and emissions of greenhouse gases are getting less and less quickly. One of the main reasons is that the Chinese policies of energy saving and renewable energy are impacting on local behaviours. However, in its recent economic stimulation plan of 4 trillion Yuan expenditure, it has not ignored environmental protection. 12% of the expenditure will directly go into energy saving and environment improving. It is done mainly by promoting the adjustment of economic structures and developing green infrastructures. A new and more inflexible power grid infrastructure is essential to increase the efficient utilization of traditional fuels and renewable energy. For example, Shanghai alone will invest 86000 million Yuan in environmental protection, 68000 of which will be put in the key projects of 4th Three-Year Action of Environmental Protection. This action will focus on improving living environment in the city, including controlling pollution cars, application of “State IV” standard to new cars, eliminating cars of heavy pollution, gas reclaim at gas stations, and etc.

From the perspective of climate change and other environmental problems, cleaner and more efficient development strategy occupy the superior position in Chinese general goals of industry and employment even in the face of economic slowing. This is very promising.


Foodstuff Security in China
The Meaning and Indicators of Foodstuff Security

The real meaning of foodstuff security is: ensuring whenever everyone can get sufficient food of good nourishment. It includes first the supply of food, then the accessibility of food, third, the reasonable utilization of food.

Recently, concerns over foodstuff security come from the following reasons. First, after reaching the peak in 1998 and 1999, food production and the national food reserves have been declining successively; second, the SARS suddenly breaking out in 2003 caused our state leaders to deeply consider national security, especially food security; third, in September – November, 2003, food price began to increase after declining for 6 years, leading to the hot discussions about establishment of a warning system of food security, many worrying about our food security and asserting it would meet a “inflection point” by about 2006 and have a probability of crisis.

Moreover, the symbol of global food crisis sharpened the concerns. The latest data published by UNFAO are more worried: the price of global food increased by 12% in 2006, 24% in 2007 and over 50% in the first 8 months this year. The number of population suffering from starvation increased from 850 millions to 925 millions by early this year.

The evaluation indicators of foodstuff security include output, storage, export and import dependence, and sufficiency of food for people in poverty. There is a standard given by FAO of measuring food security, including 3 measures : first, national food self-support rate need to reach over 95%; second, yearly food output per capita needs to reach over 400 kg.; third, national foodstuff reserves need to be equal to 18% of yearly food consumption, 14% being the warning line.

Food Security Challenges Facing China

According to the above standard, in 2007, China’s gross food output is 501.5 million tons; net export of grain is 7.96 million tons; that of bean is 30.87 million tons; self-support rate of grain including bean is over 95%; per capita foodstuff output reaches 400 kg.; by the end of 2006, ratio of reserves/consumption is about 33% and it is estimated that is about 40%-45% by the end of 2007.

However, the National Framework for Medium-to-Long-Term Food Security (2008-2020) published on Nov. 13, 2008, drafted by the National Development and Reform Commission pointed out that, although the grain production and its demand and supply situation have been developing well, agriculture is still the weak point in our national economy; foodstuff security is meeting severe challenges; as industrialization and urbanization are developing, there emerges new problems in food security: increasingly difficult for stable growth in grain production; demand and supply will be tense for a long time; trade deficit appearing in farm product exporting and importing, and increasingly greater importing of bean and cotton; prices of main subsidiary agricultural products increasing sharply, becoming a great problem in economic development.

Lacking of land resources: land resources in China are characterized by “one large and three small”, that is, the absolute amount is large, per capita possession is small, land of high quality is small and reserve resources for development are small. For cultivated land, there exist problems such as desertization and “three wastes”. Land with middle and low output accounts for two thirds of the total.

Plowland resources are decreasing yearly: the area of plowland greatly reducing has been a severe problem since Reform and Openness. Affected by adjustment of agricultural structures, ecological reuse of farmland, natural disasters and non-agricultural utilizations, farmland resources are reducing yearly. According to studies, the area of national farmland is 1826 million mu in 2007, reducing by 125 million mu comparing with 1996, with less 0.11 million mu per year.

Lack of water resource influencing growth of grain production: for grain production, water resource is an important restriction factor. Some experts argue that it affects food security greatly than farmland reducing. According to the statistics, in China water resource per capita is 2000 cubic meter, ranking 121th in the world. China is one of 13 countries with poorest water resource per capita. Moreover, water distribution is imbalanced in north and south, and most of provinces of producing food in the north China are short of water. Climate change will exacerbate the trend of water shortage.

Enthusiasm for farmer to grow grain is lost: investment in agriculture is still far not sufficient though china government has invested more in it in recent years. The pricing mechanism in domestic grain market is not profitable to the farmer. Recently, the grain price has been kept low, the saying is “cheap crops hurt the agriculturers”, and the lost enthusiasm for farmer to grow crops is another trouble for foodstuff security.

Other factors challenging the Chinese comprehensive capacity of growing crops: they include shrinking area of absolute farmland; sharply reduced really sown acreage; decreasing yield per unit area; insufficient scientific and technological support; weak infrastructure of water conservancy; discontinuing farmer class; and low positivity of the farmer to grow crops.

On the whole, demand-supply of grain is a tight balance in China for a long period.

In the past 10 years, the demand for grain has increased greatly in China. As Chinese economic force increases, people have changed their food structure: fish, meat and egg getting larger proportions, and one ton of poultry requires two tons of grain while one ton of pork requires four tons. From 1996 to 2007, grain for feedstuff has increased rapidly, increasing by about 50% in the 10 years. In 1996, it was 10491 ten thousand tons and in 2007 reaching 15700 ten thousand tons, increasing by more than 5000 ten thousand tons.

According to some scholars, every 1% of economic growth requires 0.7% of demand growth for grain. So if the economic growth is 7.5% per year, the demand for grain will grow by 5.2%. This is true of China. Above all, the Chinese demand for grain will continue to grow. It is predicted that per capita grain consumption will be 389 kg. by 2010 and the total demand will reach 5250 million kg; by 2020, per capita grain consumption will be 395 kg, the total demand will be 5725 million kg. Restricted by reduced farmland, insufficient water resource and climate changes, our demand-supply of grain will be a tight balance for long time, and grain security will meet challenges. China has great pressure in ensuring the national food security and the sufficient supply of main farm products.”

International Dimensions of Chinese Foodstuff Security

In future 1-2 years, Chinese grain reverses as high as 30% can ensure the consumption security. However, the current industrialization of growing crops and its strength are both low and from the perspectives of climate changes in future 10 years and of our demology and consumption structure upgrading, net importing of grain is a necessary trend. The Chinese demand-supply of grain has still 10% to be met. This means China has to import grain for a population of about 1300 ten thousands.

Our grain production has two weak points: bean and grease. Now the farmer is using a large amount of grain to feed livestock. People’s food structure has changed greatly, and the volume of cooking oil consumed by ordinary families is also increasing. To ensure normal development of our stock raising, government has to import large amounts of soybean. Two thirds of soybean in domestic market are imported. China consumes about 50% of global soybean. Our yearly consumption of plant oil is 2500 ten thousand tons, but we can produce only less than 1000 ten thousand tons. Over 60% requires to import from international market. We import more than 800 ten thousand tons per year, and if it were produced by ourselves we would use farmland of 1800 ten thousand mu. We import also two or three ten thousand tons of cotton, if it were produced by ourselves, we would require another 4000 or 5000 ten thousand mu of farmland.

China is under the dual pressures of increasing population and decreasing farmland in the future. Our dependence on international grain market is getting stronger and stronger. We are making full use of it, equal to using sown acreage of over 500 million mu. We require 2800 million mu of farmland to support our existing living level, but we have only 2300 million mu. So from this perspective, the Chinese grain security has not been practically settled. We have about 15% of farm products to be imported from the international market.

Two Contrasting Views Concerning China’s Foodstuff Security

The two views are mainly opposite to each other. One argues that we should give up the self-supply rate of 95%, which is embraced by economist community and some agencies. Their reasons are that the agricultural resources are rich in North America, Brazil and Africa and our exchange reserves are sufficient, we can settle the problem only by paying money. Another view argues that we must stick to the self-supply rate of 95%, which is embraced by agricultural agencies and related academia. Their reasons are that China government used to promise clearly to international community; international grain market is controlled by advanced nations, and once we have lost grain security, we are bound to be enslaved to them. The situation of international foodstuff security is complicated with many uncertainties and its potential resources are difficult to employ. We cannot highly think of their value.

Chinese Government’s Basic Goals and Strategies for Foodstuff Security

Based on all the perspectives, Chinese government has decided to stick to the base line of the self-supply rate of 95% of grain and soybean and to settle the grain security by mainly depending on ourselves. Our goals of grain security are that we should keep the grain self-supply rate to over 95%; by 2020, maintenance volume of farmland is not less than 18 million mu and the comprehensive capacity of growing grain reaches over 5400 million kg.

Self-dependence is the fundamental approach to solve China’s grain security problem. This is determined by the national characteristics in terms of grain growing and consuming. It is unpractical and non-economical to settle the dining problem of Chinese people by importing large amounts of grain. Specifically, first, China is a large country of both population and grain producing and consuming. Its farmland accounting for 9% of global total needs to support a population accounting for 10% of the total in the world, which is the greatest contribution to the world made by China. Second, the volume of global grain trade is limited, only 23 million tons per year. If large countries like China imports large amounts of grain, it certainly robs others of importing shares, leading to raising the price and destructing the relations between China and them. Third, dependence on importing grain is bound to be enslaved to others, leading to political and economic passivity. Fourth, growth of grain is a main source of increasing the farmer’s income in grain producing areas. Importing large amounts of grain from abroad will certainly influence their incomes, which has profound historical lessons and can not be ignored.

Measures for Ensuring Foodstuff Security:

The Chinese government will adopt various measures to reach the above goals.

1. Framework focuses on a long-term future, and a set of plans of 10 projects will be developed, one of which is the production capacity plan (2009-2020) of with an increase of 50000 million kg grain the countrywide.

2. To meet the consumption growth of grain in the future, China will make efforts to stabilize the areas of farmland for growing grain, ensuring over 1260 million mu for it, including 450 million mu for rice. China will also try to recover the sown acreage for coleseed and peanuts to about 180 million mu.

3. It is developing policies to improve the grain price system, making the price reasonable and favourable to the sustainable development of grain production and the income increase of farmers. Reasonable price relations will be established with international grain price. National
Development and Reform Commission declared that from the going market of new grain in 2009, the lowest purchase price of three kinds of wheat, including white wheat, red wheat and mixed wheat, will increase by 13%, 15.3% and 15.3% respectively comparing with those in 2008. The lowest purchase price of rice will be adjusted correspondingly.

4. Great efforts will be made to develop high-tech biological technologies focusing on essential agricultural ones, trying to make greater breakthroughs in yield per area and making it reaching about 325 kg by 2010, 350 kg by 2020.

5. The Chinese government will increase its investment in agriculture. The Financial Ministry will create 8 long-term mechanisms, increasing financial supports to help farmers and giving subsidies to buying farming machines. The policy of farming machine buying subsidies has been put in practice for 4 years since 2004 and government investment has increased from 7000 ten thousand Yuan in 2004 to 4000 million Yuan in 2008. The standing conference of State council held on Dec. 10, 2008 decided that government would finance 10000 million Yuan for subsidizing purchase of farming machines in 2009, increasing 6000 million Yuan comparing with 2008. The favored will cover all the counties engaging in agriculture and stockbreeding.

6. The reform of the grain circulation system will be speeded up and be promoted, ensuring national grain security and the income growth for farmers.

Monday, January 05, 2009

It Happened

By Michael Akerib, Rusconsult

We are December 6, 2040, and therefore ten years into what was called post-humanity. Great changes have taken place, but humans still exist in flesh and blood. What did change was the time – space relationship. No one was quite sure what had induced this change but it certainly had happened. For one thing, shadows of men that had lived in the past, however distant, started appearing in a haphazard manner. From the little information that had been collected from them – communication was definitely difficult – it appeared that souls were transformed into dark matter and that the widening hole in the earth’s electro-magnetic field allowed some of these souls to pass through it and appear briefly on earth. Only historians, anthropologists and paleontologists, and a few other scholars, seemed particularly interested in these contacts. With one exception – the appearance on December 6 of Saint Nicolas, bearing gifts.

Christmas is no longer celebrated and was replaced by the appearance of Saint Nicolas on Moscow’s Red Square where a single gift was given to humanity which was represented by the President of the World Council – individual countries had ceased to exist in 2020 when a series of volcanic explosions, and the ensuing near-ice-age that had ensued, required an urgent global reaction which no single country was able to fund, particularly since the bankruptcy of the United States in the early years of the century.

Saint Nicholas, was part of an extremely narrow elite that was able to time travel into the future and this is where the presents he brought originated.

Among the gifts he had brought in the past was a map with the location of major oilfields that had been missed by the oil producers, the genome of the perfect child of the future and a remedy allowing humans to drink unlimited quantities of alcohol without exhibiting the symptoms of alcoholic intoxication. December 6 had thus become the most important day of the calendar.

A large part of the world’s population was watching the events on Red Square, sitting in their armchair and watching the images of the event on their wall-to-wall computer screens.

Saint Nicholas appeared in front of St Basil’s Cathedral in the usual flash of brilliant light that characterized him. He held under his arm a gigantic roll of paper which he handed over to the President – a man of Aborigine extraction, one of the few survivors of the Big Australian Drought that had killed a large part of the population in the period between 2015 and 2020.

The exchange was very brief and was followed by several months of total silence by the authorities as to the nature of the gift. Rumors and plot theories abounded.

It was only after the President resigned, committed suicide and was replaced by a joint council, as in the early days of global government, that the content of the roll was disclosed.

It was the genealogical tree of humanity. Every single human ever born, going back to the first group of six humans that appeared in Africa, had his place in this gigantic tree.

The authorities underlined the large number of links that, over the centuries, linked the peoples of the earth. It justified the existence of a global government since humans had, with very few exceptions, mixed intensively. It proved nationalities were an invention that had had its usefulness in the past but that modern humans were a truly one and united species.

Only a very limited number of officials were let into the one element that was not disclosed to the public at large. The genealogic tree continued into the future and indicated clearly the sex, name and birth date of the children that would be born in the coming years. In the coming ten years.
It ended abruptly on December 6, 2050.

The Real Truth About Beauty: A Global Report

Findings of the Global Study on Women, Beauty and Well-Being


September 2004

Dr. Nancy Etcoff – Harvard University
Dr. Susie Orbach – London School of Economics
Dr. Jennifer Scott – StrategyOne
Heidi D’Agostino – StrategyOne
Commissioned by Dove, a Unilever Beauty Brand


The report can be downloaded - click here

[...]

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The Real Truth About Beauty study is the first attempt to both “deconstruct” and “reconstruct”
women’s perceptions of female beauty using applied research across ten countries. It shows that
women globally hold remarkably similar views on beauty (with the exception of Japanese
women on some measures).

The study demonstrates that authentic beauty is a concept lodged in women’s hearts and minds
and seldom articulated in popular culture or affirmed in the mass media. As such, it remains
unrealized and unclaimed. This idea of beauty appears to have been replaced by a narrower
definition that is largely located in limited ideals of physical appearance. It appears that the word
“beauty” has – in many ways – become functionally defined as “physical attractiveness.” This
definition of beauty is powerfully communicated through the mass media and has been
assimilated through popular culture. It is this ideal that many women measure themselves
against and aspire to attain. However, because this ideal is extremely difficult to achieve,
women find it difficult to think of themselves as beautiful. This can contribute to unhappiness
and low self-esteem and self-worth – especially among those women (often younger) who are
more likely to take their cues from popular culture.

This study clearly outlines the components of true beauty and affirms that, while they include
physical attractiveness, they also include happiness, kindness, wisdom, dignity, love, authenticity
and self-realization. Through this study, the possibilities for the beautiful to be known, found
and represented have been infinitely extended. The ways in which female beauty can move us
have been profoundly deepened.

Just as women lay some of the blame for the perpetuation of inauthentic beauty on popular
culture and the mass media, they also believe that that the latter can be a force for reconfiguring
the former so that true beauty becomes the new standard – with unprecedented power to open
minds and move emotions.

True beauty will not be driven by theory or ideology, but by its resonance in the hearts and
minds of those who encounter it. This study has given women the opportunity to speak about
what it can be. However, its articulation is the obligation of those who speak to women around
the world about their beauty every hour of every day – in the visual images and words of the
mass media. Their challenge is to know true beauty when they feel it and to faithfully represent
it in the ways in which they speak about it.

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

EFMN correspondents’ day 2008: Weak Signals in Foresight

This year's European Foresight Monitoring Network (EFMN) correspondents' day takes place in Brussels on the 3rd - 4th November. The network comprises European policy professionals, foresight experts and practitioners as well as analysts of science, technology and innovation related issues. . The aim of the EFMN correspondent's day is to infuse the so far largely virtual EFMN community with real life. The event itself strikes a good balance between presentations of interesting foresight content and the opportunity to network with like minded professionals. Attendance is free of charge.

This year's event theme is weak signals. This topic receives increasing attention from policy-makers and firms to yield results in practice. A mix of presentations is planned covering the methodological challenges of identifying weak signals as well as presentations of case studies from weak signal studies done for firms and policy-makers.

The event takes place at the Brussels University Foundation starting at 12:00 on the 3rd and ending the following day the 4th November at 15:00.

A detailed programme will be sent to all participants after registration has closed.

Highlights of event

Weak Signals
· Keynote speaker: Dr Elina Hiltunen on weak signals research (Futures Research Finland / Nokia)
· Anssi Tervonen on weak signals at timber firm M-real (Datarangers, Finland)· Weak signals identification in policy.

EFMN activities
· Key Messages from the EFMN Journal Special published 2008.
· Opinion poll and discussion on weak signals
· Results of EFMN mapping and Issue analysis 2008
· Presentation of recent EFMN briefs production and website tutorial

Presentation by Pierre Valette; Head of Unit DG-RTD/L.2: Commission Roadmap

Networking / self-presentation:
· Opening with lunch buffet
· Informal dinner arranged at the conference location
· Option to present own work and ideas in Pecha Kucha style at conference

For details see the EFMN website

IBC FCPUG SuperMeet

Final Cut Pro User Groups from Los Angeles, Boston, Italy, Germany, UK and from around the world will be heading to Amsterdam, The Netherlands for the First Annual "IBC FCPUG SuperMeet" to be held on Sunday, 14 September, 2008 at the Gashouder on the grounds of the beautiful Culture Park Westergasfabriek as part of IBC. This event is expected to be the largest
gathering of FCP Users and Gurus on the planet during IBC week.

"We¹ve produced these events as part of Macworld in San Francisco and NAB in Las Vegas for the last seven years," says Michael Horton, co-producer of the SuperMeet and head of the Los Angeles Final Cut Pro User Group. "And for seven years we¹ve wanted to bring the SuperMeet to Europe. Now we will."

A SuperMeet is a user generated event that brings together digital filmmakers and users of Apple¹s Final Cut Studio suite of applications from all over the world. Hundreds of like minded people gather under one roof for one night of fun, networking, and presentations of Final Cut Pro tips and tricks, digital camera techniques, new software and hardware, and show and tells from Independent and Hollywood filmmakers. In addition there are two dozen companies showing off their software and hardware in what is called the "FCP Trade Show." Furthermore, at the end of the night there is a raffle with prizes totaling over $50,000.00 that will be handed out to dozens of
lucky winners.

"We¹ve got a great agenda lined up for this SuperMeet, said Daniel Berube, co-producer and head of the Boston Final Cut Pro User Group. "Europe deserves the best and we think we have delivered. We will have the latest on Final Cut Studio delivered by Apple¹s Paul Saccone. We are bringing a little of Hollywood too, with Director Jeffrey Nachmanoff (screenwriter of The Day After Tomorrow) and Film Editor, Billy Fox (Hustle and Flow, Black Snake Moan) who will discuss how Final Cut Studio helped bring the recently released film, "Traitor" starring Don Cheadle to life. We will also have Miguel de Olaso from Spain showing off Red Camera footage and workflow, the new Infinity Camera from Grass Valley/Thomson, the Sundance Audience Award winning documentary "Fields of Fuel," Production Premium from Adobe and Final Cut Pro tips and tricks. It¹s going to be a great show.

Doors will open at 17:00 and the show will begin at 19:00. Tickets are on sale online only for Euro 10.00 each and this event is expected to sell out.

Historically every SuperMeet for the past seven years has sold out.
Complete details, including daily updates on the agenda as well as a link to where to buy tickets can be found on the lafcpug web site.
http://www.lafcpug.org/ibc_2008

"There is nothing like a SuperMeet," added Michael Horton. "You have to attend one to really understand what it is all about. This might be our first time in Europe, but if you are a filmmaker or a Final Cut Studio user, then you do not want to miss this event."

Event information at
http://www.clubofamsterdam.com/event.asp?contentid=777

Monday, June 09, 2008

Pakistan in the 21st Century: Vision 2030

By Shaukat Hameed Khan, Project Director, Vision 2030, Fellow, Pakistani Academy of Sciences





Executive Summary

1. Introduction

A Vision is like a dream, but one which is experienced with both eyes open and with one’s feet on the ground. The Medium Term Development Framework 2005-10 launched by the Government in July 2005 presented the Vision of a “developed, industrialized, just and prosperous Pakistan through rapid and sustainable development, in a resource constrained economy by deploying knowledge inputs”. Vision 2030 extends that dream further and higher in terms of space and time.
The Vision 2030 for Pakistan has been prepared after a consultative process spread over two years. It presents a strategic framework for overcoming obstacles and challenges standing in the way of the preferred future chosen by the people of Pakistan.

We aim to achieve the stated Vision within a generation, in a manner that sustains a high quality of life and provides equal opportunities to its citizens to reach their true potential. We plan to meet contemporary and future challenges by deploying knowledge inputs and developing human capital. This, we believe, is the substance of the Vision in our mind.

The Vision document necessarily combines idealism with a sense of the possible. Its goals reflect the aspirations and potential of our people in the context of a fast-changing world. The Vision 2030 exercise considers a range of futures with concomitant strategic alignments. Yet the underlying theme is to embrace needed transformation, and to create new opportunities based on our innate strengths. This is the basic theme of Vision 2030.

Growing economically at a rate of around 7-8 percent per annum, Pakistan expects to join the ranks of middle-income countries, with a GDP of around USD 4,000 by 2030. This high growth rate would be sustained through developing its human resources, and by developing the necessary physical and technological infrastructure.

The growth trajectory will gain momentum by the latent capacities of a sizeable middle class emerging in the development process. Besides sustaining high growth rates, benefits of growth are planned to be equitably distributed, and poverty to be largely eliminated.

The citizen shall have greater access to quality education, as well as basic amenities like health, water and sanitation. Freedom of enterprise and enlarged opportunities will transform the lives of the majority but the benefit of social protection will provide sufficient cushion to the most vulnerable.
Vision 2030 acknowledges the forces of globalisation and dispersion of information and technology, which are likely to dramatically change the scale and character of human enterprise. By 2030, human lives, workplaces, education, skills, trade and competition would stand transformed. We are determined to manage these global forces of change to our advantage.

We intend to make a mark in the various fields of knowledge which can add value to our endeavours. What is posited is a quest for excellence, so that Pakistan can redefine and transform its institutions and structures as well as national policies, priorities and goals. We need to convert knowledge into a socio-economic enterprise. It should transform the market place, the quality of its processes and products and the productivity of our human resource.

The acquisition and dissemination of knowledge and the quest for excellence will be the driving force of our future destiny. Our vision is demanding and simple at the same time; we aim to transform ourselves into a state, society and economy dedicated to the assimilation and generation of knowledge, the harnessing of technology, and the practice of compassion. In making this transformation, we will continue to nurture the roots of our culture and remain uniquely Pakistani.

1.1 The Consensus

There is a remarkable consensus among the stakeholders about the future of Pakistan. This country is poised to assert its innate significance in one of the world’s most strategic areas. With the right choices and intelligent calibration of its strengths, Pakistan can attain its historical promise. There is confidence in the air and a determination to build on our successes which are not few but many in diverse fields. We are a nation determined to stand alongside the best of the world with confidence and faith in our destiny.



There is national consensus on the following fundamentals:

i. To build a nation whose development is measured by economic growth as well the quality
of life enjoyed by its people;

ii. To evolve into a tolerant and productive society, which is at peace with itself and with the rest
of the world, within a framework of sovereignty and security;

iii. To establish the rule of law as a bedrock principle impacting on all walks of life;

iv. To encourage freedom of enterprise and innovation in the market place together with state
responsibility for the provision of basic services to all citizens, including education,
healthcare, water and sanitation, shelter, and security under law;

v. To make employment and employability, a central theme in economic and social policies,
with special emphasis on the rights of women;

vi. To eliminate absolute poverty and ensure social protection for the weak and the vulnerable;

vii. To generate and absorb knowledge and harness technology for the good of all while
promoting social sciences and humanities as an essential branch of knowledge;

viii. To sustain an average growth of 7-8 percent in the long term through effective investment and
saving strategies while maintaining macro-economic stability;

ix. To take advantage of globalisation through enhanced competitiveness in a global economy
relating to commerce, manufacturing and services, with increased diversity and quality of
content;

x. To facilitate the emergence of “Brand Pakistan”, which will result in several large
conglomerates becoming global players, and many more regional hubs and centres
established in Pakistan;

xi. To re-design the structures of state and instruments of government in terms of participation,
delivery of services, and good governance;

xii. To maximize dividends from the demographic transition in the coming years, while avoiding
the pitfalls;

xiii. To manage the anticipated growing competition for access and ownership of resources
and energy both regionally and globally;

xiv. To prepare for climate change, and its likely unfavourable implications

xv. To minimize wastage of natural resources as an important tool for preserving inter-
generational equity;

xvi. To prepare for the dynamics and imperatives of growth of large cities, urban concentrations
and expected internal and international migration;

xvii. To achieve significant breakthroughs in the sectors of education, employment and energy
while consolidating and expanding the gathering momentum in infrastructure and service
sectors.

All these objectives will be achieved through consensus of all stakeholders in a graduated but timely fashion.


2. The Challenge

Pakistan will continue to face many challenges, which will all have to be managed and turned into opportunities for the welfare of the people. Some of the important challenges are:

i. Population: Pakistan is projected to become the fifth largest country by 2030, with
a population ranging between 230 and 260 million people, some 60 percent of whom will
live in urban areas.

We expect dividends of our declining birth rate in the form of attainment of universal primary
education by 2015, and universal secondary education by 2020-25. The second dividend
will be higher productivity and a faster economic growth because of higher educational
attainments throughout the population.

ii. Employment: The current techno-economic-knowledge revolution places a
premium on education and skills. Employment generation, and matching of skills with
demand in a changing workplace will therefore be central to poverty reduction, economic
growth and social stability.

iii. Resources: Natural resources will be severely depleted and stressed, especially
water, land and forests. Assuming that current water consumption patterns continue
unabated, projections show that at least 3.5 billion people — or 48 per cent of the world’s
projected population — will live in water-stressed river basins in 2030, including Pakistan.

The situation will be accentuated by the looming climate change; its impact and capacity to
de-stabilise the geographical spread and location of human habitats is only just beginning
to be understood.

- Integrated water resource management, which aims at ensuring the most optimal use of
water, is a major strategy for overcoming the looming water scarcity.

- Pakistan has not managed its water resources with care and is now becoming
increasingly water-stressed (less than 1000 cubic metres per capita). The country’s
current storage capacity at 9 per cent of average annual flows, is very low compared with
the world average of 40 percent. Further, on average, 35 MAF of water flows into the sea
annually during the flood season. In addition, extensive damages result due to flooding.
Without additional storage, the shortfall will increase by 12 per cent over the next decade.
Increasing storage capacity is thus an important part of the strategy.

- It is planned to increase storage capacity by 18 MAF (6 MAF for replacement of storage
lost to silting / sedimentation and 12 MAF of new storage) in order to meet the projected
requirements of 134 MAF.

The large storage facilities will be complemented by a comprehensive programme of
small dams, and other measures for recharging underground reservoirs.

- While the agriculture sector will remain the predominant user of water, the requirements
for industry, municipal and human use will continue to increase. It would be necessary to
enhance efficiency for all uses of water, including re-cycling and re-use.

- There is a dire need for aggressively pursuing all resource conservation technologies for
sustainable agriculture. Our existing irrigation methodologies, based on gravity flow, are
extravagant and unsustainable.

- There are nearly 14 million acres of salt affected wasteland with brackish underground
water as well as large areas of sandy desert. Pakistani scientists have pioneered bio-
saline agriculture technology whereby such lands can be economically utilized through a
National Bio-saline Agriculture Program. Drought-tolerant and water-use efficient crop
varieties through biotechnology will augment conservation of water resources.

Salt tolerant, fast growing grasses, shrubs and trees are planned to be grown with
brackish water, and used as a feedstock for economic conversion to methane or ethanol
for fuel.

iv. Food and Agriculture: Our vision is an efficient, competitive, and sustainable agriculture which will ensure food security, rural livelihood, and will contribute to the economic development of Pakistan.

Few people would have accepted that Pakistan would be able to feed its growing population, which increased from around 34 million in 1947 to 156 million in 2006. Not only has this been achieved, in addition rice h as been exported nearly every year, and even wheat occasionally. It was able to achieve food self-sufficiency, triple its agricultural exports, reduce poverty, increase income levels, and improve the quality of life for its people.

· The Green Revolution has essentially run its course and its achievable potential has been largely realized.

When we couple this with the looming water shortages, we believe that it will be difficult for Pakistan to support an estimated population of 230 - 260 million in 2030, with current technology and current best practices alone.

· Biotechnology will play the critical role in meeting agricultural targets during this century, leading to higher production, better resistance, and lower costs of production.

· Small farms are continuously increasing in number because of land division due to inheritance. This is impacting agricultural productivity, as small farmers are generally resource-poor and need greater attention.

We may need to re-visit the debate over land reforms in keeping with the demands of the 21st century.

v. Energy: The world will demand even more energy, on the wave of rapidly growing demand from Asia; it will be in short supply, and may not be affordable. Pakistan too will require enormous amounts of energy to meet its developmental challenges, and to attain and sustain its vision for economic growth. We must therefore change the way we draw up our strategies for acquisition, generation and conservation of energy:

· Diversification of the energy mix, by expanding the share of coal, nuclear and renewable energy from its current combined share of 20 per cent to 36 per cent by 2030;

· Increase in capacity of strategic reserves from the current 29 days of demand to bring it closer to the 60-day supply of USA by 2015, and Europe's 90 days by 2030. This is also a hedge against price volatility/market panics;

· Improved and expanded oil and gas distribution networks, both within the country and internationally;

· Increased energy cooperation, whereby buyers and sellers expand investments in each other's energy infrastructure. Pakistan will actively pursue exploration in oil and gas fields abroad as well as investing in infrastructure (ports and shipping) for handling enhanced use of LNG;

· Extensive use of coal-fired plants based on indigenous and imported coal, coupled with carbon capture and sequestration to reduce emissions;

· Meet fully the oil and gas exploration targets set in the Energy Security Plan, which is the most effective path for enhancing energy self-reliance in Pakistan;

· Make buildings more energy efficient, specially for reduction of air-conditioning loads in summer. Solar heating will be promoted for winter;

· Put in place mass transit systems in major cities to meet the mobility needs of the public, and to reduce pollution;

· Accelerate the current programmes in alternate energy (especially wind), which have the potential to provide more than 5 per cent of the electricity supply needed in 2030, as incorporated in the Energy Security Plan;

· Build up the local power engineering industry for power plant equipment, steam turbines, and generators;

· Initiate research in emerging thrust areas such as fusion, fuel cells, and hydrogen for energy generation and storage.

These measures need to be complemented by broadening the database through regular census and surveys in order to fine tune energy planning.

vi. Rural and Urban Dimensions: Pakistan will become predominantly urban by 2030. An additional urban population of the size of Punjab’s total current population (about 80 million) will have to be accommodated. Further, mega-cities of the world will compete with nation states, on the basis of congruence of cluster strengths and a whole new set of economic dynamics. This will demand a holistic approach within Pakistan also to address the issues of increasing rural non-farming employment skills, rural-urban complementarities, and linkages to develop balanced hierarchies of settlements. This is expected to increase productivity in every sphere.

vii. Sustainability: The battle for biodiversity may have been irretrievably lost already in mankind’s quest for high economic growth. We will be faced with the challenge of managing a growing deficit of inter-generational equity and conservation of our environment.

viii. The Race for Talent: Men and women of talent and skills will be valued and sought after by all nations, driven by changes in the nature of work and the workplace, demands for greater productivity and innovation, and to make up for aging populations.

To meet this challenge, education sector strategies will include the following:

· Enhance the scale and quality of education in general and of scientific / technical education in Pakistan in particular.

· Increase public expenditure on education and skills generation from the present 2.7 per cent of GDP to 5 per cent by 2010 and at least 7 percent by 2015.

· Generate an environment which encourages the thinking mind to emerge from our schools. Among other things, this would require qualified, and well-paid teachers, whether at the level of the school, the college or the university.

· Establish one curriculum, and one standardised national examination system under state responsibility.

· Make employment and employability the central theme in economic and social policies. This will require major investment in skill generation after 10 years of schooling, and social reforms to draw in women, since labour markets are always socially embedded.


3. A Just and Sustainable Society

Achieving the true potential of each and every citizen is the cornerstone of Vision 2030. The basic thread in the discourse of Vision 2030 remains the creation of a just society, without which Pakistan will not flourish and prosper. Pakistan will continue to be a multiethnic, multi-cultural, and multi-religious society.

3.1 The Social Context

It will be imperative to achieve synthesis among the streams of religion, cultural roots, and scientific methodology. We are confident that within Pakistan, as elsewhere in the world, identities based on religion, language and culture will have emerged into a state of maturity by 2030. The challenge will be to strengthen social and political institutions, to ensure that any imbalances and social tensions do not hold the country back.

Attaining gender parity and universal female literacy remains a challenge due to large regional variations and low female enrolment and retention in rural areas. There have been some impressive gains in empowerment of women in recent years, with reserved representation in federal, provincial and local elected bodies.

However, there are a number of daunting challenges hindering moves towards gender equality. The gender gap is most serious in terms of opportunities for education, health, and employment in rural areas. A school in every settlement, and vocational and technical education especially in the good practices of agriculture and livestock, would be key instruments for reducing poverty among rural working women, who outnumber their male counterparts in these sectors.

The conversion to a gender balanced and empowered society is a slow process, requiring careful but persistent sensitization of society. This process will be encouraged within a wider environment of continued government interventions and social activism.

3.2 The Political Context

Pakistan will need to adapt its institutions of state and instruments of government to become more responsive to the needs of the 21st century. Even greater attention will be required in building the capacity of civil servants, specially those at the provincial and local levels where the delivery of services actually takes place. The political framework will be required to enhance democratic processes so that participation and ownership of all citizens in decision making can be improved.

We expect to see the following in 2030:

· The spread of education and sensitisation to citizens’ rights in Pakistan will have led to the resolution of many issues which agitate the Pakistani public at present.

· The performance of government will be judged by the security of life and property it provides, and the quality and speed of justice offered, and not simply by economic growth rates.

· The provision of public goods, such as security of life and property and the provision of justice under a strengthened social contract, will dominate the functions of state, since it cannot be an effective helmsman of economic development, unless it can provide social contract goods effectively.

· Political susceptibility and ‘clientilism’ will have been mostly eliminated. The civil servant of the future in Pakistan will have learnt to work within the environment of greater political participation, devolution and social mobilisation.

· Most government functions will have devolved to provincial and local governments.

The excellence of Pakistani institutions in 2030 will be reflected in the state’s capacity to unilaterally reach its governance targets for internal and external efficiencies, which must include:

· Consolidation of a democratic culture in society;

· Fair and efficient access to, and sharing of, infrastructure and wealth through pro-poor policies and training;

· Protection of the rights of the citizen against arbitrary decision making;

· Access to justice whereby redress is available and dispensable to all, with offences regarded as offences against society and not merely persons;

· Development of legal and regulatory frameworks to minimise risks inherent in public-private partnerships.

3.3 Critical Benchmarks of a Modern State

Vision 2030 postulates that Pakistan needs to cross some critical benchmarks to manage the modern state of the 21st century. These will include:

i. Justice and Law: The first is an independent judiciary, made up of good men and women, who are just - but not too good as to be unjust. Moreover, laws exist for every known contingency, it is their enforcement, first as decision in the court and then their implementation, which is crucial.

ii. Government Efficiency: A second important, and separate, dimension is related to the efficiency of government and the quality of the bureaucracy. We must ensure a professional civil service, which facilitates and implements policies, and is free of clientilism – be it political, donor-related, or even cadre-centred.

· The professionalism of the civil servant is critical to the reform process, whether through greater induction of technocrats or their lifelong capacity building and learning. Close interaction with technology and understanding of its social and economic accelerators will be necessary. This is specially applicable to the service cadres at the provinces and local government level, where the actual delivery of services takes place.

· Extensive administrative reforms are needed in Pakistan to attract and retain competent officers, and to establish better interaction across the tiers of government and its various organs.

· Improved service structures and security, and opportunities for professional growth, as well as greater political insulation will need to be ensured.

iii. Participation: Third, the democracy deficit needs to be overcome. This is essential to restore trust between the state and the people, who need to know and see that the state actually cares for them.

iv. The Non-State Actor: The influence of the “non-state” actor can be significant, specially the international institutions, which are much more intrusive into national societies than traditional ones. Their policy prescriptions tend to make national borders irrelevant. This can seriously affect the ability of a state to meet its governance targets, since effective governance depends upon the availability of a minimum spatial congruence of political regulations with socially integrated geographical areas and the absence of significant externalities. They also have severe representational deficits, and increasingly contain features which undermine the consensus principle of international cooperation.

Pakistan will witness an increasing emphasis on public–private partnerships to increase the resource envelope, and to increase efficiency and delivery of services. The relationship between the public and private sectors will have matured, and its dynamics much better understood in 2030. It is imperative to develop the legal and regulatory framework to minimise risks and facilitate this partnership.

v. Globally Integrated Economy: By 2030 economies are likely to diffuse across national boundaries into truly global supply chains, whether in industry, services or ownership. This dispersal of work and strategic linkages across national boundaries, coupled with information integration, and a shift in the technological content of world trade towards high technology, will be the most conspicuous features of the globalised economy of the future. There will be a continuation of relocation of manufacturing and an increasing share of design and services from the developed countries. Attracting and retaining relocation activities and investments, and developing into regional or global hubs, will be major challenge for Pakistan.

vi. Changing Nature of Work and Workplace:

Pakistan will need to address the challenges of a changing workplace, changing demand for skills, and a flexible gender inclusive workforce. A new economic landscape is being created globally that highlights a shift from geographical industrial clusters to virtual clusters, driven by digital innovation. These clusters are emerging in the new competitive space offered by a web-based business world, where “how you do business” can be more relevant than “where you do business”. For Pakistan, it translates into a challenge to operate the next generation of communication networks, which combine convergence with speed, stability, security, and flexibility.

vii. The Asian Region: The most abrupt transformation is occurring in Asia which is expected to be the engine of global growth and consumption in the foreseeable future. If some emerging economies in Asia can sustain their growth for several decades, then three of the four largest global economies will probably be Asian in 2030. Pakistan’s competitors will be other Asian countries.


4. The Macroeconomic Framework

Pakistan’s macroeconomic framework in 2030 will be linked to the level of globalisation prevalent at the time. Whether globalisation is intense or benign, Pakistan may have little ground for manoeuvre, and the state would still be busy in maintaining the balance at the fiscal, monetary, and external levels.

In both cases, low inflation would be an important goal, tariffs would also be low or within those set by the international environment, and the number of taxes would be few.

We expect Pakistan to have eliminated extreme poverty in all its manifestations much before 2030. The state would build upon this to increase the employability and quality of life of all its citizens.

High GDP growth rates exceeding 7–8 percent are envisaged in view of recent performance; however, the low levels of savings and investments, broad-basing of growth, its sustainability over time, and the trickle down of growth benefits to the poor, would remain major challenges.

We expect the share of manufacturing to rise from the current 18 percent in 2005-06 to nearly 30 percent by 2030.

Within manufacturing, there is also a need for diversification from textiles to machinery, electronics, automobiles, pharmaceuticals and chemicals, to match the global trade composition. Fortunately, all these sectors are showing strong growth.

The services sector plays a vital role in sustaining the growth of Pakistan’s economy, with a share of about 60 percent in GDP, and 44 percent in employed labour force. A cross-country comparison shows that share of services sector in GDP is currently about 75 percent in most developed countries.

Boundaries between services and industry are changing fast, and about half of all services in modern industrialized economies are sold and bought while being embedded in the form of goods. While the content and function of goods remain important, the designing, marketing, consultancy and advertising services claim a share of the value added to goods. Manufacturing, too, has important contributions from services, such as resource planning, warehousing, value chain analysis, financial services and inputs, after sales services, and the logistics of transport and communication.

All these elements are a core focus of Vision 2030.

The government will provide the necessary infrastructure, human resource development including skill development and the development of scientific and technological infrastructure. The government will also use fiscal incentives including tax holidays, depreciation allowance, tax credits, subsidy for R&D, freight subsidy etc. to promote the export-oriented and hi-tech industries.
An important instrument to achieve Vision 2030 would be to enhance the trade/GDP ratio from the current 30 percent to about 60 percent by 2030, or around USD 600 billion by 2030. The services sector accounts for nearly 60 per cent of the GDP but contributes very little to the revenue generation (telecommunications and electricity being the exceptions).

The major interventions required are strengthening of the infrastructure, and assurance of quality standards and accreditation. Quality improvement and diversification would require active partnership between the private and public sectors with a focus on increasing export competitiveness.

In a world of aggressive competition in the global market, generating growth exclusively from factors accumulation makes a country uncompetitive. Empirical estimates suggest that 20 to 50 per cent of GDP growth has emanated from productivity gains in various countries. In Pakistan, TFP has contributed one-third to its growth in recent years, but it reflected an extreme form of inefficiencies in the base year, rather than improvement in productivity.

Rising levels of investment without an increase in savings result in external debt; savings rate in Pakistan is around 15 percent of GDP (with investment levels of 20 percent) which is quite low in the perspective of 6-8 percent growth rate envisaged in Vision 2030.

The country is entering into a capital intensive investment regime in order to diversify towards hi-tech industries, to meet the energy and infrastructure requirements, and to provide for the human resource development. The minimum level of requisite investment would range between 27 to 30 percent if the growth rates of GDP envisaged in the vision 2030 are to be realized.

Accordingly, a major effort is to be made to increase the savings rate from the current 15-16 per cent of GDP to 25 percent at least.


5. Building Competitive Advantage

Pakistan must quickly put in place the infrastructure and instruments for matching of transnational skills, to deal with the emergence of the 24 hour / 7 day working society, and to cater for relocation of manufacturing and design high income developed economies. Apart from the excellence of public institutions and quality of macroeconomic policies, the driving force will remain flexible, skilled and innovative technical personnel; and fast and efficient physical and electronic connectivity.

We need to bridge the increasing digital divide between Pakistan and the global leaders. We will need to establish an excellent, low cost, physical and electronic connectivity (part of the required technological infrastructure) with the rest of the world, specially with those countries from where industrial and business relocation is possible.

Establishing a world class and innovative telecommunication infrastructure is therefore an important pre-requisite to enable both manufacturing and services sectors to expand rapidly.
The reduction of the digital divide offers enormous opportunities for the emergence of major Pakistani business and industrial conglomerates.

Services and industry constitute nearly three quarters of our national income, and the future economic growth of Pakistan will take place in its urban areas, particularly the mega-cities and other large urban centres. Our future urban centres will be planned within the framework of strategic master plans, incorporating economic parameters for efficiency gains to make our cities competitive in the global and regional context. The development of urban infrastructure will ensure that the location of business and commerce is fully facilitated.

There is a need to carefully enforce and strengthen the legal and regulatory infrastructure for IPRs, speedy access to justice, and resolution of commercial disputes. The local spirit for innovation will be enhanced through better enactment and enforcement of the laws, accompanied by world class quality and standards.

Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) will be the prime vehicle of employment generation and poverty alleviation. Government interventions will be focussed at lifting them out of the low skills, low expectations trap. Business trust will be enhanced through better contract enforcement, as part of the overall enabling environment.

With these enablers in place, industrial and commercial competitiveness will increase, and productivity will improve through information-intensive, value-added processes. Well before 2030, several local enterprises will reach the technological trajectory where they become generators of knowledge and skills.

The cost of doing business is determined by a large number of factors, with availability and cost of infrastructure as the major factor. Pakistan has recently introduced several measures to reduce costs of doing business faced by investors (local and foreign), and was ranked
[1] at 74 out of 175 countries in 2007; the ranking of the BRICs countries was 121 for Brazil, 96 for Russia, 134 for India and 93 for China. The most critical issue remains adjudication and settlement of disputes, where Pakistan ranked 162 globally.

The new arc of activity from Gwadar to upcountry and beyond into China and Central Asia (the Energy, Trade, Transport, Industry corridor) will be a major catalyst on completion, as it will make use of Pakistan’s prime location on energy and trade routes, to meet its own need as well as those of its neighbours.

Urban centres will be planned within the framework of strategic master plans, incorporating economic parameters for efficiency gains, to make our cities competitive in the global and regional context.

5.1 The Physical and Technological Infrastructure

The infrastructure will be strengthened to ensure that bottlenecks do not impede the envisaged growth and competitiveness:

· Excellent Physical Infrastructure. A comprehensive programme has been launched under the National Trade Corridor Initiative to overhaul the entire logistics chain, physical connectivity and processes (motorways, expressways, railways, ports and shipping and airports) and efficiency to bring them at par with international standards. The time spent at our ports to clear imports has already been slashed by more than half, and will be reduced further.

· Major investment in standards, measurements, testing, and accreditation are being made to assure quality of processes and products.

· ICT: Pakistan will put in place a multi-platform, any-time any-place infrastructure, which can meet the challenges of technology convergence in order to cater to needs of the present and future. The quality of service for the ‘last mile’ is of particular focus. Development of the infrastructure and secure environment for e-Commerce will receive high priority.

· Special economic and industrial zones and clusters will be encouraged to reduce the cost of production.

With an excellent infrastructure in place, Vision 2030 expects for a quantum increase in manufacturing and services to fuel long term growth.


6. Building the Innovative Society

A society without innovation and based only the upon use of technical skills, for production and services, will not flourish for long. After the initial economic growth, the envelope of prosperity and quality of life can only be increased through research, which will help to promote both planned and unplanned pathways for development. It is the unplanned application of fundamental research which generally has greater impact in the long run.

Innovation, however, does not mean research only. The basic building blocks of an innovative society must be put in place before any other expectations can be made. The first essential requirement is universal enrolment and completion of education for a minimum of ten years. The second requirement is for an environment which nurtures independence of thought – the creation of a thinking mind among the children. Here the choice of medium of instruction is extremely important. This is the essence of the knowledge worker, and this is the prime focus of Vision 2030. If we can succeed in creating the thinking mind, we will have the instrument for change.

The third requirement is the creation of a set of skills and aptitudes which will enable employability and productivity, at the same time as the ethics of a social environment are inculcated in the young mind.

Finally, the ‘long pole’ in the tent of an enlightened society is the teacher. Teacher shortages are exacerbated by low salaries, low status, and low expectations, coupled with indifferent attitudes and pedagogical skills. This issue deserves the highest attention, since the teacher is the mediator between what is intended to be taught and what actually gets delivered, and determines the kind of young men and women coming out of our institutions. The teacher will be at the centre of educational reforms in Vision 2030.

Recent investments in education, research and infrastructure have improved the
environment in Pakistan recently, but not enough is being done at the school and college level. It is still hampered by lack of critical mass and insufficient skills in design, and instrumentation. The issue of critical numbers is being addressed through greatly enhanced funding for faculty development and research funding,, and a focus on quality.

There will be focus on the five technologies driving the techno-socio-economic revolution of the 21st century: energy, materials, biology, nanotechnology, and computational power. Space is in a category of its own in its ability to fire the imagination all human beings, and will be actively pursued.

Pakistani scientists and engineers can play an important part in building up a broad research base in energy and its new technologies. This offers employment and industrial opportunities as well, because the energy crunch is already here.


7. The State and Security

The sovereignty and security of Pakistan will need to be addressed at two levels – internal and external. As Pakistan moves towards greater prosperity, preserving its physical space and even expanding its virtual counterpart will become extremely important. The emergence of new global players in the 21st century is a certainty, and a whole new set of strategic alliances are being quietly forged in Asia, on the premise that these new players will have an impact as large as the imperial powers of the previous two centuries.

Fortunately for Pakistan, size will still matter, whether demographic, economic, or military, to help preserve the national space.

There is potential for Pakistan to be a bigger player in matters of global security instead of being a target. However, Pakistan is placed geographically and politically in a region of great tension, at the same time as its economic growth and expectations are rising.

Domestically, Pakistan needs to ensure not only food and energy security, but also an equitable distribution of all forms of wealth and the opportunities to access and generate them, and removal of the democracy deficit. Such an internal concord would be the best protection from external forces and events.

Pakistan will continue to work towards peace in the region, so that its economic space can be cultivated intensely, and the fruits of development can be shared by all its citizens. Promotion of peace and dialogue is therefore a critical element of its foreign policy.

It is reasonable to expect that the Pakistani state in 2030 will have evolved as part of the international order of modern progressive states, where international issues will be resolved through dialogue and negotiations rather than coercion being applied under delusions of empire or quest for hegemony or resources. With peace in the region, Pakistan can get on with the business of building a prosperous state.


8. Some Concluding Reflections

In 2030, Pakistanis will be better educated, better fed, and better served by the state in which their participation will be far greater than in the past, because of much improved instruments of state and government. Worry will remain about the nature of the state in terms of size and intrusiveness, on the shoulders of the unfolding information and scientific / technical revolution. Science and society will continue to co-evolve in this century, with science continuing to provide more singularities and disruptions through unplanned pathways, as it has done throughout human history, specially the last 100 years.

The Vision 2030 document emphasises the four levels at which the Vision process has been placed. These are the nature of the state, the economy, the society, and the global imperatives in which the process will be embedded. It also discusses issues related to energy, knowledge, science and technology, and changing demographics from the viewpoint of global demands for competition, productivity, and diversification. All these are placed within the boundaries of sustainability of the environment and the human habitat, and intergenerational equity.

No matter what the background, everyone agrees that Pakistan must change. It must change to manage the reality of global competition. It must also learn to manage the shift in the centre of economic and political gravity to Asia.

The most interesting impact of the Vision process is the ‘re-discovery’ of Pakistan’s young people – vibrant and confident, possessing higher expectations and skills than their forebears, and no longer willing to settle for second best.

They had somehow been forgotten in our lost decades, but in 2030 they will be the ones who will have wrought the changes which we all wish for. They will also be more demanding of quality of government and assured equality under law, a sustainable habitat and environment, and better delivery of services. They are already more pluralistic and inclusive than the older generation, and have the confidence to take what they like or want in cultural terms; they also carry lesser historical baggage. They are the instrument for achieving our Vision for a productive, progressive, just and stimulating Pakistani society in 2030.


[1] World Bank; Doing Business 2007.

Saturday, May 24, 2008

Beyond Innovation

By Simon Jones, Director, Human-Computer Studies Laboratory, University of Amsterdam





Introduction

In a few short years innovation has moved from being the domain of wild-haired creatives into an effective business process that acts as one of the levers for extracting value [1]. At this point it is timely to pause and consider ‘what’s next?’ After all, the global environment continues to get more complex, competition gets tougher and the demands of customers increasingly sophisticated. How can countries, regions, cities, private and public sector organizations respond to this challenge? How can they succeed in a marketplace where innovation is an established technique, widely deployed? How do we reach way beyond what is possible and proceed as though it could be? In short: in order to maintain competitive advantage, what comes after innovation?

This article looks at the next wave of change for organizational and individual creativity. It argues that to thrive in the non-linear, quixotic, accelerating world we live in the creative response has to evolve beyond systematic processes of innovation and become spontaneous, volatile, impulsive and serendipitous. In short, we need to be instinctive.

It seems paradoxical, perhaps even reckless to suggest the next competitive edge will arise from preferring instinctive action to formal process. However, there are a number of existing cases where doing precisely that has been the best route to higher performance.

Innovation Today

Innovation is the act of connecting human creativity into a supply chain. Sometimes it is connected into an existing supply chain and sometimes it creates an entirely new supply chain. Many organizations have recognized the central role of innovation as a means of extracting maximum value from assets old and new. Indeed, many companies, cities and regions will claim to have a culture of innovation and methods plus tools and techniques for innovating. As such innovation is becoming a systematic process for creating, managing and deploying human creativity [2]. Contemporary European economies see innovation as a main component of maintaining economic success and ensuring future prosperity for their people. However, the globalised nature of business means that the emerging economies of Asia and beyond are similarly adopting and adapting innovation practices as they too seek to climb the added-value ladder. If the developed economies of Europe are to maintain their competitive advantage just having an innovation system will not be enough, they will have to accept that their competitors can deploy innovation strategies at least as effectively, just for example, as they do today with quality systems. To flourish in the future Europe needs to master the skill sets that lie beyond innovation.

Three Cases of Instinct.

Flying

Manned flight has been possible for just over 100 years. In that time, engineers and scientists focused on aerodynamics to develop smooth, stable flying platforms. The creation of such aeroplanes has had a transformative effect on our lives, of that there’s no doubt. Aeronautical engineering developed rich and sophisticated theories and models about the behaviour of airplanes. A key element of any aeroplane is its control. The ability to fly straight and steady under differing conditions makes for a plane easy to manage and generally safe and sound. However, where aeroplanes need to out-perform each other, such characteristics are disadvantageous. In the extreme case of military fighter aircraft, airframes which are inherently aerodynamically unstable are not only desirable but offer the best opportunity for surviving a dog fight [3]. In pursuit of this goal, aircraft designers have rejected much of traditional airframe design and wilfully create planes which left unmanaged will hurl themselves into pieces. However by harnessing these designs to appropriate sensor, actuator and control systems, successful flight is possible by continually adjusting the system to correct the instability when needed but permits such instability when the resulting changes deliver enhanced manoeuvrability.

Avant-Jazz

In the mid 1950s, Ornette Coleman produced his albums ‘Something Else’ and ‘Tomorrow is the Question’. These are generally considered to be among the first Avant Jazz (also known as Avant-Garde Jazz or Free Jazz). Ornette and others like him found accepted Jazz styles to constrain not to liberate him. Avant Jazz uses many Jazz idioms, but the role and rules of composition are considerably weakened. Avant Jazz emphasizes the role of improvisation and has few or no pre-composed elements [4]. In the last 50 years this approach has evolved considerably and more structured and compositionally influenced forms have also emerged [5]. Nonetheless the underlying recognition is that above and beyond a certain point structure and process inhibits and it is only by wilfully freeing oneself of these things is further progress possible.

The Game of Life

The Game of Life [6] is a well known computer simulation where a large square of cells, can be either black or white. Cells have a rule to decide whether they change colour and this is usually decided on the basis of the colours of the neighbours. The simplest version checks what colour the majority of the neighbours have and changes the cell colour accordingly. It’s a lot of fun to observe and can create a series of remarkably attractive pictures and animations. However it also has many important practical applications. The Game of Life is one representative of a class of systems known as cellular automaton (CA) they turn out to be powerful tools for the analysis of complex systems including encryption and many natural systems. However they operate in a very precise way. All cells have the same rules to obey and all cells update themselves at the same time. As a result of these restrictions many important problems, especially those that model living cells or the phenomena of complex groups are not easily addressed by CA’s. Moreover, the constraints on their behaviour are intrinsically unrepresentative of real cellular systems. Researchers have considered eliminating or modifying these constraints and proposed asynchronous cellular automaton (also referred to as stochastic or probabilistic cellular automaton) [7]. These devices still change state as a basis of neighbour information but do so at a time of their own choosing and with a certain probability of a change occurring. Such systems are far harder to analyse and control. Sometimes they fail to do anything useful and rapidly get stuck in a single state or oscillate aimlessly around a few patterns. However it has also been discovered that with suitable rules and suitable starting conditions asynchronous cellular automaton can not only solve problems faster and quicker that regular CA’s but also solve complex problems that regular CA’s simply can’t.


Post-innovation

If we look at the three diverse examples above, there are a number of common factors which point us in the direction of the post-innovation landscape.

  • They have moved from an environment of a small number of cohesive macro-rules to one with many overlapping and conflicting micro-rules
  • The participants have a very high level of skill and experience in the domain
  • The overall control system intervenes very frequently but each change is relatively small
From Macro-rules to Micro-rules

This seems to be one of the characteristics of the post-innovation landscape. Unstable aircraft are more manoeuvrable than stable ones. The well established equations and design principles of aerodynamics have been wilfully ignored to create a structure where instability of the airframe is maximised. The elements of the airframe fight against each other and together do not form a system optimized for airborne transport. In Avant-Jazz the well established compositional techniques, timing, tonal forms, melody and rhythm have been disregarded. The sound produced however is not random, each of the notes, phrases and forms have specific musical intent, it is the rules that produce songs and melodies that have been discarded. In cellular automata systems with a single or a few update rules, they are now superceded by devices where each cell has its own rule and conformance to those rules varies according to time, context or chance.

To use a language metaphor, in all these 3 cases, the established ‘grammar’ of the system has been replaced by something else but the individual sounds, formants or syllables are redeployed not abolished.

High-Level of Skill

One of the advantages of innovation practices is that it deskills the process to make it accessible to many people. However in these examples of a post-innovation landscape, such practices are currently only possible by those with extremely high levels of skills and techniques. Unstable airframes require pilots with the highest levels of training and expertise. Avant-Jazz is a form simply impossible to play by any but the most gifted musicians. The design and operation of asynchronous cellular automata even now defeats leading mathematicians and computer scientists. Success in the post-innovation landscape is likely therefore to depend on access to individuals who have been trained to the very highest levels and have significant expertise in particular domains. Such individuals have to have mastery of their specialist topic before they can effectively go beyond innovation to create new economic, social and technical landscapes.

Frequent Adaptation

Traditional management or control strategies usually operate on a macro-scale. A goal is set, it is monitored at a relatively small number of intervals (e.g. mid-life project reviews) and outcomes generally assessed towards the latter of half of a project. In the post-innovation landscape this is likely to be quite different. The ‘occasional touch on the control stick’ strategy taught to pilots is highly unsuited to modern fighter aircraft. They require frequent adjustments to stay in the air. Indeed, the degree of instability is such that computer support is generally necessary for most of these aeroplanes to be flyable. In Avant-Jazz rehearsal and scores are generally neglected. Instead a premium is placed on improvisation during which players play instinctively based on their own phrasing and the music that other players around them are currently producing. At its best it results in music with a passion and nuance unmatched by other forms. Cellular automata update their own behaviour frequently, in the asynchronous case the rules of updating are modified at least as often as the cells, resulting in a complexity of behaviour unmatched by traditional forms.

The Post-innovation Perspective

The post-innovation landscape will require different approaches from organisations, different forms of interaction and different skill sets. Of course the longstanding needs of entities will remain: they have to have a purpose, operate within an eco-system or supply chain and have ready access to financial, social, physical and information infrastructure. Current innovation programs are still necessary in the same way the need for quality systems is also not bypassed. However, the post-innovation landscape impacts leadership, organisational development, regional and city innovation policies and the educational sector. The following sections outline where and how these changes will be felt and how best to adapt.

Expertise

Organisations will need significant numbers of people who are given a great deal of autonomy and these people will be entrusted with the future of the organisation. Their own individual track records will be of the highest calibre but their challenge is to deconstruct skill sets and knowledge and create a new vocabulary and grammar for themselves and their organisations. They may not know precisely where they are going, but their instinct and flexibility serves them well.

These individuals will have to spend much more time learning, experimenting and exploring than is done today. Perfecting their operational skills and exploring new concepts is vital to keeping good instincts and the ability to create new vista’s

Their skill set and approach makes them much more similar to elite sportsmen or artists. In common with such types, they will have a relatively short period in their lives where such instinctive abilities can be effectively deployed. Thereafter roles for them in developing new experts or other roles need to be sought.


The Post-Innovation Organisation

The operational mode of organisations will need to change. There will still be the need for long-term strategy but this will necessarily be broad brush and greater emphasis given to the culture, beliefs and value of the organisation as the guiding lights.

The organisation must possess superlative change management capability such that large numbers of small changes can be effortlessly and fluently executed; a challenge for even the most able COO’s. The organisation must have the capability to assemble and reassemble itself frequently and rapidly to ensure effectiveness as a new cultural and operational landscape is pioneered.


Regional and City Innovation Policies

Given the increasing importance of attracting star players to a region or city, the emphasis on a creative eco-system where supporting mechanisms such as venture capital, world-class universities and a pleasant living and working environment will increase in importance. Furthermore, such individuals are in demand and need to be attracted and incentivised to stay. Traditional inward investment and regional development strategies have focused on companies. Given the increasing role of instinctive leadership, this approach is likely to be insufficient and emphasis on locating and attracting key individuals either at or before their peak performance will increase in importance.

Educational System

Such a landscape is likely to require significant numbers of talented individuals who like premier league footballers or international artists, are highly in demand for the relatively brief period they perform to the highest standards. This rapid turnover of instinctive experts means that the educational system needs to reform itself to nurture and enhance creative talent of the highest order. Europe’s elite institutions will need to expand to significantly enhance the number of people with skills of the highest level. This represents a new challenge to the massification trend of contemporary higher education and research that some will find difficult to attain.

Ultimately the requirement of the education system will be to hugely increase the number of individuals who have sufficient mastery of a domain to create a grammar and vocabulary that moves beyond it and put that into practice. This is truly uncharted territory for advanced education.

Summary

Innovation is not the end of individual, organisational or regional creativity. Human ingenuity remains central to competitive ability. The systematic approach takes us so far, but examples for science, technology and the arts show the fullest competitive advantages come from highly skilled individuals, encouraged to reconstruct their domains instinctively and possessing the courage and fortitude to master a world of permanent instability and ruthless competition.


References

[1] ‘Taking Action: Making Innovation Pay’, Harvard Business Review, James P. Andrew, Harold L. Sirkin, John Butman, Jan 9, 2007.
[2] ‘From Ideas to Income’, CEO Today Sovereign Publications. Simon Jones, September 2007, accessible via
http://www.simon-jones.com/ideastoincome
[3] ‘F16 Fighter’, Global Security Inc, http://www.globalsecurity.org/F16Fighter
[4] ‘Jazz’, Encyclopedia Brittanica Online, http://www.britannica.com/jazz
[5] Avant-Garde Jazz, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avant-garde_jazz
[6] ‘The Game of Life’ Scientific American 223 120-123, Martin Gardner, October 1970.
[7] ‘Notes on finite asynchronous automata’, W. Zielonka, Informatique Théorique et Applications. v21. 99-135.

Author

Simon Jones is Full Professor at the University of Amsterdam and former CEO of MIT’s Media Lab Europe. He is Founder of Ictinos Innovation which advises governments, regions, cities and corporations in innovation policy and invests in and advises start ups in the ICT and New Media area. He is based in London and Amsterdam.

What future coal?

By Michael Akerib, Rusconsult






In the wake of today’s energy crisis, the number of solutions to reduce our dependence on oil and gas appear limited: alternative sources such as ethanol, wind or solar power; nuclear power or coal.

Coal appears to be a candidate of choice in view of its low price and its relative abundance in some of the OECD countries, but also in China, a country whose hunger for energy is growing exponentially.

In fact, the Middle East is the only zone where the sub-soil is wealthy in hydrocarbons but poor in coal.

At today’s prices, oil is seven times more expensive than coal on a thermal unit basis and this price difference explains the increase in global coal consumption of 35% over the last five years to account at present for 40% of electricity production.

Two-thirds of the world’s reserves are found in four countries: the USA, which holds 27% of the world’s reserves, Russia 17%, China 13% and India 10%. These countries, together, also represent two-thirds of global production.

The amount of reserves has, however, been put into question. The same tonnages have now been posted for several years, even in countries, such as China, Vietnam or the US, which have a high extraction rate.

The Energy Commission of the European Commission has strongly reduced the amount of reserves, from an initial figure expected to cover 277 years of usage, to 155 years. BP has an even more pessimistic outlook, with a forecast limiting the reserves to 144 years.

Germany and Poland have, of their own accord, and without providing any explanation, also drastically reviewed downward their reserves – Germany by 90% and Poland by 50%.

To confuse the issue even more, Australia and India revalued their own reserves….

Production in the countries of the European Union declined considerably. However, there are plans in France to rehabilitate certain mines and even to open new sites that were considered unprofitable until now. Such a move would enable Europe to be less dependent on Russian gas.

Only 20% of world production is exported, the market being essentially domestic. This, however, is set to change as previous self-sufficient countries are now becoming net importers.

Seventy per cent of the coal extracted is supplied to electricity producers, and 40% of the global electricity production is based on coal-burning technologies. Coal thus covers a quarter of the world’s energy needs.

Germany plans to close its mines by 2018 and would replace their production by the import of 50 million tons from Russia. Should such a contract be concluded, Russia would need to double its production. RWE, a major German utility, is planning to build three new coal-fired plants.

In Poland, 80% of the electricity produced is in coal-fired stations.

Italy is modifying some of its electricity plants that presently burn oil so as to function with coal.

In Britain, one third of the production of electricity is coal-based.

Russia is also increasingly looking at coal as an alternative to gas due both to poor planning, a shortage of production and an absence of investments in the required infrastructure. Russia’s coal production is presently 300 million tons and is forecast to reach 400 million tons by 2010. A five-year plan ending in 2011 should add 41 000 megawatts of new capacity at a cost of $ 130 billion.

Coal production decreased due to the restructuring of the industry, and Russia is the country with the highest dependency on oil and gas for electricity production. The present coal to gas ratio for electricity production is 26:71, and the objective is to change it to 31:65.

The mines in Eastern Siberia and the Pacific are economically viable, with an extraction cost of Rubles 35 to 100 per ton, or approximately, $ 1.5 to 3. The coal is particularly low in sulfur and it would be an attractive product to export, if it were not due to the distance between the mines and the ports, and the lack of a developed domestic transport infrastructure.

It is possible that Gazprom will acquire the coal monopoly, as well as its present near-monopoly on gas, the only obstacle being the Russian anti-trust agency.

India’s electricity production is very much coal dependent, as 80% of its electricity is generated by coal-fired plants. Tata Coal was awarded, in April 2008, a major credit line by the World Bank’s subsidiary International Finance Corporation, to build, in the state of Gujarat, their ‘Ultra-Mega’ plant which will burn coal to produce 4 billion watts per year as well as 23 million tons of CO2.

Coal production is the monopoly of Coal India which is unable to satisfy the rapidly increasing demand in spite of deposits of 100 billion tons. Thus, India’s coal imports should continue to rise and could even be higher than the country’s production of 400 million tons.

To maintain a steady flow of imported coal, however, major investments will be required in port and rail infrastructure.

An alternative to imports would be to abolish Coal India’s monopoly and allow private entrepreneurs to invest in coal production. There is little hope that this development will take place as the trade unions have indicated they would resist such a move.

China is a major user of coal since coal-fired plants are responsible – just like in Poland – for 80% of the country’s electricity production. On this basis, China uses annually 2% of its reserves and is now a net coal importer due, mostly, to the distance between the coal mine and the largest consumers of electricity, and hence of the power plants. The coal imports could reach 50 million tons per year. This would allow the country to treble its electricity production. It is believed that one new coal-fired plant is inaugurated every week. Precise figures are not available as a large number of these plants are operated illegally.

China Coal did a successful IPO on the Hong Kong stock market in 2006, and raised 1.7 billion dollars, thus enabling it to increase its production through the opening of new mines.

Another Chinese company, Shenha Energy, a producer of both coal and electricity, has a stock market value of $ 63 billion, which ranks it as the world’s most highly capitalized coal producer.

The renewed attraction of Chinese coal mining firms on the stock market is due to the partial liberalization of sales prices, with a maximum increase of 10% per year.

Electricity demand in China is driven not only by increased industrial output, but also by the increase in living standards and therefore an increased use of air conditioning systems.

In the US, 50% of the electricity production is coal-based and the country is a significant coal importer and the best quality deposits have been exhausted or nearly-exhausted.

There are plans to build up to 150 new plants, particularly to meet the growing energy requirements of the West Coast.

However, bankers and pension funds are extremely reluctant to fund these projects as they expect the Federal Government to pass very strict regulations in the near future.

The coal-miners lobby has been very active in clamoring for billions of dollars to allow electricity production from a mix of coal-based liquid products. A process of converting coal into gas, underground, could enable the country to reduce its oil imports by up to 30%.

Discussions are also under way with the US Air Force for a 25 year contract to supply a carbon-derived fuel, to partly replace the present consumption of 10 billion liters of jet fuel.

Producing fuel from coal, however, requires enormous quantities of water. Also, mining activity alters the scenery in a major way.

The total number of projects of coal-fired plants in the world add up to approximately 1 000 over the next five years. This would represent an increase in coal consumption of 3%per year until 2015 and of 2% per year from 2016 to 2030.

Coal generates 37% of the world’s CO2 emissions, but remains below the level of the emissions due to oil which represent 42%. It is, however, a worse emitter of carbon dioxide per ton. It also releases sulfur and some highly toxic pollutants not contained in oil, such as mercury.

The 600 tons of mercury released on an annual basis by China blow over Korea and Japan, the Russian Pacific and eventually reach California.

The damage caused by pollution has been estimated by the World Bank to cost China 10% of its GDP.

These problems have led to several projects to ‘clean’ coal.

The European Union’s CASTO (Capture to storage) program aims at reducing the cost of capturing CO2 by one third, as the present level of 60 Euros is considered uneconomical.

The storage would be done under the ocean floor, for instance in empty oil and gas wells. Initial experiments on land in the US and offshore in the North Sea have yielded positive results. There is nevertheless a risk difficult to asses in case of a major earthquake.

China produced 1.5 billion cubic meters of methane from its coal deposits. This figure represents 3% of its natural gas consumption. The 2010 target is to reach 10 billion cubic meters, representing 10% of the total consumption.

A gaseification process was developed in the US, based on the earlier Fischer-Tropsch process, to transform the hydrocarbons contained in coal into a hydrogen-rich mixture called ‘syngas’. This product burns as cleanly as natural gas and can also be converted into gasoline or diesel.

China invested $ 4.5 billion, two-thirds of which were raised on the stock market, to build two 2250 ton reactors to transform coal from the neighboring mines into gas. The process makes economic sense with a barrel of oil above $ 50.

The added value to US coal mines of such a process would be huge and Peabody Coal, the world’s largest producer with a turnover of $ 5.3 billion dollars, has calculated that it would reach $ 3 600 billion for this firm alone.

American Electric Power is working on a process called Integrated Gasification Combined-Cycle which would enable not only a gasification, but also the use of the gas to action a turbine. The CO2 could be collected relatively cheaply and buried or used to produce methanol.

The cost of building such a factory would only exceed by 15 – 20% the cost of a classic coal-fired plant.

In conclusion one can say that coal has a bright future, particularly if clean technologies could be developed to reduce the heavy pollution it causes and the anti-nuclear lobby is successful in blocking the building of new nuclear power plants.

It is therefore urgent to reassess reserves to limit the risk of building plants that would not be ensured of a continuous supply of raw materials.

Wednesday, April 09, 2008

The Fall of the US Empire

By Michael Akerib, Rusconsult

US Motivations
The fall of communism seemed to offer the US a unique opportunity to further its goals of spreading democracy and trade to a large part of the world and to establish a revised and improved version of the new world order in which a Pax americana would prevail. It offered also the possibility of controlling the major sources of fossil energy in the world.

World domination by one country inexorably leads to the rise of challengers and in the present case the challengers have been terrorist groups rather than nations. This has led the US to concentrate on the fight against terrorism and lose the overall geostrategic perspective.

Return to the nest
Repeatedly throughout history, when it appeared that the international situation became too complex and dangerous for the interests of the country, the US decided to fold on itself and its internal problems in an isolationist mood.

The sense of hopelessness comes today not only from the inability to solve the problems in Afghanistan and Iraq, but also on the absence of a clear and concerted vision of how to disengage US troops, and incidentally that of its remaining committed allies, from the area.

To this sense of hopelessness one can add fear - a fear of terrorist activity at home, of course, but also a fear of a loss of identity due to illegal immigration. Both are fueled by the US government itself who communicates intensely on both issues.

It has translated into blocking sales to foreign buyers of US-owned oil companies and port infrastructures, a refusal to alter immigration regulations, building a wall on the border with Mexico and, above all, stalling progress on the Doha agreement.

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CIFUS), that reviews acquisition of certain US businesses by foreign buyers, has lengthened the review process and increased requirements for approval. Its role was extended in 2007 through the Foreign Investment and National Security Act.

Protectionism is further fueled by the feeling of the average American that the globalization process is hurting rather than improving living conditions and in particular purchasing power and unemployment. This view is particularly prevalent with the younger generation and in the industrial mid-West.

Moral issues
The US is no longer credible as a leader in sustaining moral issues. Guantanamo, secret prisons, kidnappings by CIA operatives and torture, have undermined any claim to moral virtue. The very idea that democracy can be installed by force in countries that reject it as contrary to their traditions and what they believe to be the will of God, is deemed ludicrous particularly when, simultaneously, the US is backing dictatorial regimes to prevent the rise of anti-US movements.

Increasingly the US is perceived, not only in developing countries but also in many European countries, as practicing a form of imperialism and of behaving arrogantly, endangering world peace. The increased wealth of multinationals although, to be fair, not all are of US origin, and the considerable exploitation of the weakest, particularly in the developing countries, is also perceived as immoral.

The US' engagement behind liberal market economics to be imposed willy-nilly as the only possible way forward has left the country bearing the brunt of the revolt against exploitation and the increased wealth gap.

A looming economic crisis
Even though the size of the US economy relative to that of Asia and Europe is no longer what it used to be, the huge debt of the US could significantly weigh down on the global economy, if only because of a sharp reduction in imports, and lead to a massive devaluation of the dollar and the total loss of confidence of foreign investors. Asian economies, including Japan's, are largely export-driven by US demand.

Unless US taxes are significantly increased, or spending on non-defense items reduced, the defense budgets will not enable the US to maintain its present exceptional global military dominance.

Today the US government is almost totally dependent on oil producing and emerging nations the governments of which hold two-thirds of the US debt. China alone is believed to hold nearly $1 trillion in US bonds and the oil exporters of the Gulf $3.5 trillion. They surely hope that forecasts that US government debt will one day be classified as 'junk bonds' are over-pessimistic.

These sovereign funds, which have a growth potential to reach $ 15 to 20 trillion by 2015 - 2020, could be used by foreign governments to acquire US assets. In a second phase, they could also be used to destabilize American financial markets through massive sales of these same holdings. China has recently made repeated threats in that direction.

Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Kuwait, Qatar and Saudi Arabia are increasingly investing in currencies of emerging markets and Kuwait no longer pegs its currency to the dollar.

Iran now receives payment for its oil shipments to Japan in Yen, no longer wanting to hoard dollars. In an OPEC meeting, President Ahmadinejad called for other OPEC members to abandon the dollar as a payment currency; an idea that did not encounter much echo for fear that such a declaration would further weaken the US currency.

Gazprom is considering the possibility of invoicing part of its gas shipments in Rubles.

Because of a number of trade and other sanctions against certain countries, decided unilaterally by the US, and of the risk of asset confiscation this entails for corporations trading with these 'rogue' countries, multinational corporations and financial institutions are avoiding both the currency and the clearing procedures carried out in New York.

US financial woes are not purely domestic and tied to bad loans in real estate, but are also due to differentials in interest rates with other currencies such as the Euro and to fears Central Banks may shift their reserves to non-dollar currencies.

The situation with the US economy contrasts with Russia's. Foreign reserves are of the order of $ 400 billion which, on a per capita basis, makes it the world's leader. The Stabilization Fund, which collects 80% of oil revenues above $ 27 per barrel, amounts to $ 120 billion and has effectively been split into two: a purely reserve fund, that might be used to support the ruble, and a National Prosperity Fund that will be used to invest in the economy.

Russia is also continuing to attract an increasing amount of foreign direct investments, and this is not targeted exclusively at natural resource industries.

All of the above presently make the ruble a highly undervalued currency and has led Putin to call for a 'new international financial architecture' starting with a revamp of the role of the IMF and the domination of the EU over the nomination of its director.

There is little chance that his call will be listened and none of the three candidates to the US election have even broached the subject.

By burrowing their heads in the sand will American leaders lead their country to an irreversible isolation and decline?

And if so, who could replace them as the world's leading economic power?

Friday, March 21, 2008

Ecological Architecture - some thoughts

By Patrick Crehan, Director, Club of Amsterdam, CEO, Crehan, Kusano & Associates sprl

Thoughts about the event about the future of Ecological Architecture

1) The term ‘ecological architecture’ is not well defined it refers to something that lies beyond green or sustainable architecture. It demands more in terms of environmental and human performance.

2) Existing standards for sustainable/green/ecological/good architecture are inadequate. They set the bar too low in terms of performance. They are ineffective in that they attenuate the aspirations of building owners when commissioning. Owners who want to achieve a certain rating or certification with respect to a recognized standard, feel no need to go beyond the highest rating, even if this could be done at little extra cost.

3) The building is one of the basic units for architecture. The challenge of ‘ecological architecture’ exists at many levels – building, urban environment, city, country or planet. Question: Do standards exist at these different levels? How do they interact?

4) Though technical, the issue of measurement is important for the reason that you cannot manage, compare or improve what you cannot measure. Question: What are the dimensions of performance for ‘ecological’ architecture’? … at the level of the day-to-day running and maintenance of the system? … over the life-cycle of a ‘project’? … at different scales?

5) High performance architecture (at building level anyway) does not have to be expensive. It is possible to build ‘zero-energy’ or ‘autonomous’ buildings at no extra cost. The cost structure will be different from conventional approaches in that some items cost more but are off-set by savings elsewhere.

6) To have a real impact there is a need to educate people and help them make appropriate changes to the way they live.

7) The real issue for large scale adoption under current conditions is the retro-fitting of existing buildings. Making high-performance buildings from green-field sites is relatively easy. Question: Is there a role here for standards to be required of landlords or of government in public procurement?

8) One of the challenges of adopting ecological architecture is resistance to the substitution of consumables. The ‘radiator’ is an old consumable, often not the best solution to a problem, but other solutions are possible such as in-floor systems for heating and cooling. This has been possible for many years, but take-up has been low. Another example is in the design of sun-screens. Those that roll from the bottom to the top are much more efficient than those that go from the top to the bottom, but they are generally not employed.

9) Governments have no incentive to reduce the energy cost of buildings. Energy is taxable and ecological architecture ultimately means the loss of a source of revenue. The enemy is not ‘government’ in that governments need taxes to run society. But they need to recognize an alternative. The same force is at work in the case of alcohol and tobacco. Question: What would happen if overnight all taxes of energy, alcohol and tobacco disappeared? What would this mean in terms of loss of revenues for taxation to pay for healthcare, social security, school and hospitals? What could be done to replace these revenues in an ageing post-petroleum society? What would such a society look like and where would it generate the taxes to cover its own cost of social infrastructure. Maybe the real revolution is not in building standards, but in a whole new vision for organizing society that includes a new model for taxation?

Saturday, March 15, 2008

The Economic Storm

Inter view with Martijn Aslander by Jorrit Timmermans
(translated into english by Rodien de Maar)


About transformations to a Network economy
The storm is a metaphor for the changes happening in our world. Changes with impact and results that are incalculable. They are also happening within the economic world. Many of our old patterns have had their longest time. We are richer than ever and have more capabilities than ever. But the consequences of this growth in our world are slowly but unmistakeably felt by everyone.

Thankfully storms settle down and give new energy and chances. Martijn Aslander knows what the possible consequenses are. Martijn, who lives off networking and connecting people, is involved in more than a 1000 projects on yearly bases. He does this by following his heart. He turns all the available information technology into value for himself and others. His attitude to life is best described by the scouting law which he learned at an early age. A scout goes into the world with the other to discover this world and make it a better place to live in. He is honest, loyal and never gives up.He is economical and sober. He is a go-getter, cares for nature and respects himself and the other. You can definitely count on him.

The economy is the sum of all the transactions and barter mechanisms that keep our society in place. Untill now the focus has been on collecting as much profit and capital goods as possible. But now that seems to be changing. We seem to be asking ourselves whether more money is needed, useful or valuable. On account of frequent usage of scarce resources, striving towards maximum profit often fails. Also companies have the tendency to waste the talent of many people. The well known rat race in which employees carry out their limited tasks day after day, restricts the enormous worth that people could actually bring into the economy. Martijn quotes futurologist and trend watcher Justien Marseille by stating that our society is making a jump from maximisation of profit to one of maximising usefulness. This simply means that you do the thing which you are good in, in the place at that given time which makes for optimal worth. Talent as an important impulse for the economy, that’s new.

How is it possible that individual talent suddenly has the room to grow? Until now, we were restricted by means only available to organisations to be able to produce. This was certainly true when our economy relied on agriculture. With the coming of mechanisation and industry, this became more amplified. Later, when the computerization was a fact, it brought us the home computer and the internet. After this, the individual had meaningful tools at their disposal. With the home computer, everyone is able to write their own book, produce a movie or compose their own music. And the internet is our direct link to the whole world and thus the market. At the same time, the costs decrease so fast that everyone can join in to show their talent and offer their products.

Experiment
This development gives us the freedom to ask ourselves what on earth we are doing. And whether we might actually want to do it differently. There are still so many people that are not satisfied with what they are doing. Information technology gives us the opportunity to do things that were impossible in the past. Dependent on our talent we seek and find the necessary knowledge, information and contacts on the internet. This leads to an economy driven by networks instead of companies. And money does not seem to play the biggest role. The new barter system seems to be one of talent, knowledge and information.

Critics say it's impossible to make a living this way. So Martijn decided to test this theory and take on the experiment of not asking any money for his work. Soon he found that he either had a lot of money or hardly any money at all. But he always had just what he needed that at his disposal just. A computer, an overall subscription to public transportation, insurance, an office and indeed just plain money. Because if you can offer something that is valuable to many, then people are more than willing to donate in order to keep it coming. Martijn let go of all pretences and trusted that he would be fulfilled in all his needs at all times. Seeing this was a success; he began thinking of what we really need in this world.

Evolutional movement
The answer that he found is not directly a logical one. What we really need according to him is movement. Evolution makes us constantly adapt to our environment. And adapting means movement. With those kinds of dynamics our nature makes us search for ways to do things in a different but foremost better way. It makes us want to learn, to try, to create and to innovate. A natural process which unfortunately is discouraged in our present school system. While the bigger problems in our society – social cohesion, innovation, care system, education, competition with other countries like China and India – scream for our capacity to adapt.

How this natural movement can be started is something Martijn knows all about. Every year he organizes a large festival in the woods in Drenthe, a province in the Netherlands. In three days a whole village is built where people can even pay electronically. While normally a festival of this scale would cost a couple of hundred thousand euros, Martijn and his enthusiastic and talented crew do it for less than 12.000 euros. And no script is even used. The circumstances in which this project can develop is mainly dependent on something Martijn calls swarming. A varied and motivated group gets together for a certain project. From within their own skill, everybody participates a little which means that the pressure all round is kept low. Because of the joint exchanges everybody learns from everybody. And after the project is over, everyone goes their own way again or starts on the next project.

Super functional cooperation
What is happening is, it’s using the network as a business. It groups together around a certain project and organizes that which needs to be organized. Then afterwards, it falls apart again. At first glance it seems more chaotic than businesses as we know it now. However, nature knows only how to use this form of non-organization also called the organic fluid pattern. A swarm of birds, a school of fish, a termite hill, these are all examples of a super functional cooperation in subtle tuning with each other. It is this coherence that spontaneously comes up in a network driven by a mutual goal. The internet and the ease with which like-minded people know how to find each other, makes people act as one organism, one species working together on this planet more than ever before.

Web 2.0
Martijn is an insider when it comes to the technology used within the network economy known as Web2.0. This is the term used for a collection of useful tools which the internet offers for free. Tools for project management, file-exchange, marketing, information sharing. The sourcecode for these tools is accessible to everyone (open source). The unwrittenrule in the open source community that is Web 2.0 is that in exchange for using the tools, you have to make your own improvements and adaptations available under the same conditions. A much talked about example is the online encyclopaedia Wikipedia: it's content is freely accessible to anyone and everyone can contribute. The accuracy of Wikipedia is nearly on the same level as the renowned Britannica Encyclopaedia. And the number of topics is many times larger. Small contributions by a large group of enthusiastic users make for the open source mentality in which products become better and extend fast. See the power of the economic network grow.

The Holy Trinity of Dynamics is the term used by Martijn to describe this. It describes a new consciousness of information. Ideas are important.We already knew this. Also the connections between people are important. But information is the key between the ideas and the people. With information you pull people towards you. Information is necessary to create an idea, to carry it out and to talk about it with others. Consciousness about information in our society has not yet taken a leading role.

We have to be nice
Besides the technological tools that are available to make the most of the network economy, there are some personality traits that come in handy. Martijn mentions a fast working and flexible mind, an open attitude, curiosity and courage / guts. And the most important part of all, is being nice. He realises that you need the other as much as he needs you.

The distant sound of the hippies can be heard in his approach. "I still have a bone to pick with them" Martijn says jokingly. Their enthusiasm and ideas appeal to him a lot. They just didn't have the means to execute them. Martijn does. And that he has a point is something you see for example in the opinion of the Belgian top economist Bernard Lietaer. This great thinker is a true believer in complementary economies, where regional currency and bartering play a central role. To rely on a monetary economy alone is much too instable. A disaster like the one of 9/11 makes the dollar collapse and looses our faith in the economy. While it says nothing about the productivity or creativity of people. The revival of true value is the core of the network economy. Besides, says Martijn, a monetary economy can only grow by locking your money away in a bank so interest can be collected on it. Social capital on the other hand grows when you give it away and share it freely with others.

Information is the new currency
It is an interesting thought that giving leads to growth. You can only spend money once. Then it is gone. Ideas, information and access to your network are something you can give away over and over again without loosing anything. The reverse, keeping your information to yourself, leads to being excluded eventually. And without connections you loose all worth. In the network economy, information and networking are the new currency. It is valuable and exchangeable. And it stipulates that you should behave yourself. Only in a goodrelationship with the other there is room to exchange talent and value. It means that we have to become human again instead of taking on a role in which we perform transactions for money. It is obvious that we are in need of a redefinition of the economy.

Instead of profit maximisation we are moving towards optimisation of usefulness. Value creation wil happen better and faster in a networked environment instead of in bricks and mortar companies. As a direct result social capital shall become an important factor. The relationships between people will be more important than the transactions. Having faith in the value of the other and opening your own knowledge and network guarantees you can join in. Status will be decided by the ease with which you have flexible access to information and the connections with others. Perhaps the main change will be finding our humanity again in everything we undertake.

Monday, November 19, 2007

Sex, The Internet’s Own Wasteland

by Melissa Gira, Editor, Sexerati.com, San Francisco







The nymphs are departed.
And their friends, the loitering heirs of city directors;
Departed, have left no addresses.
- T. S. Eliot


I don’t mean to lay the blame at your feet, internet, but I am. How abysmal, how easy. In the morning there are sex bloggers on both America’s coasts (and in the middle, too, but there are fewer, or at least, fewer who say so) searching you for signs of intelligence, and just coming up pale and empty. For fuck’s sake, Technorati’s WTF? Sex has already been taken over with SEO rubbish, the fate of any social search tool that sex is allowed to traffic in (Yahoo killed theirs, and what of you, Mahalo?). Want to cry into your tea with less of a community of users driving your tears? Just customize your Google homepage to sex story feeds (here, I’m not territorial, are a few of mine: “sex study,” “sex research,” “sex science”) and read, weep, repeat. SEX NEWS IS BAD NEWS. Sex news tracked on the Web even more so. Sex news tracked by an untrained public? Just hand me my Hitachi and the handcrank generator, or something with enough batteries to get me off until the future arrives for real, please.So what, then, would break through the internet wasteland of sex, where scandal passes for conversation and teaching people how to have an orgasm (so long as we don’t track your IP or tell your blogroll) and not get HIV is still seen as the apex of sex education? These are all still vital acts, yes, but they are not the whole picture of sex, not hardly. In fact, the more we focus on the endgame — coming, not dying — we lose the big picture, of why this information might be hard to come by in the first place.

What sex media would make a dent in this? Can sex media make a dent? Sex blogging at first seemed the answer: of course,
people have been blogging sex since before blogging was blogging, and when blogging broke into genres — prematurely, I say, but of course, it brought advertisers with it — sex blogging itself went a bit stale. Is it good for the state of sex to just fill the web with more and more and more stories of all the ways we could, do, would fuck? Is it good for the state of sex to just say more — or ought we consider how to speak more smartly of sex?
Blogging is just a platform, blogging could be what we like, and FTW, Sexerati is not going to get all
Andrew Keen on sex & the web, but what if it did? What if we dosed the sex web with a bit more erati – the gleeful elitism of sex that we supposedly dare not go there with? Sex is to be celebrated, sure, and people everywhere need better sex education, sex skill-building, sex comfort even.

But what else? Sex culture. Sex lit. Sex analysis. Sex theory. Sex happenings. Sex community.

Sex smarts, in other words, that fill the needs of not just the individual, but the sexual body politic. Sex that serves a civic duty, yes!

Sex that can be spoken from the rooftops and straight on through them, not just confined within a textfield.

There’s no argument that the internet has given rise to new sexual speech.
Foucault, Sedgwick, Rubin, all would rejoice a little. Now, though, surrounded by new online sex acts each day, is it not time to apply a bit of a critical eye to how sexuality is produced by the internet? How we play a part in the production of sex in not just our reading, linking, and tagging, but in what we don’t even think to look for?


the piece is offered to you under a Creative Commons License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/


Melissa Gira is a speaker at our event about
the future of Sexuality
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Registration: 18:30-19:00, Conference: 19:00-21:15
Ticket Corner
http://www.clubofamsterdam.com/event.asp?contentid=720



Thursday, November 08, 2007

Sexuality in the 21st Century?

A compilation of quotes and ...

Internet Porn - The Lucrative Business of Online Sex
Video by Max Joseph, Jon Miller, Cameron Cohen, Music by Don C, GOOD Magazine

  • China is the world’s largest exporter of sex toys and novelties, with an estimated 1,000 factories involved in the manufacture of “adult healthcare products”. The Chinese government estimates that about one-third of all adult products and 80 percent of sex toys and condoms sold worldwide are made in China, with annual revenues from sales of Chinese adult products reaching RenMinBi 50 billion ($6.7 billion) in 2006.
  • A study found that both men and women reported experiencing an orgasm in about four percent of their sexual dreams. Orgasms were described as being experienced by another dream character in four percent of the women's sexual dreams, but in none of the male dream reports. Current or past partners were identified in 20 percent of women's sexual dreams, compared to 14 percent for men, and public figures were twice as likely to be the object of women's sexual dream content. Multiple sex partners were reported twice as frequently in men's sexual dreams. - ScienceDaily
  • Many older Americans routinely engage in vaginal intercourse, oral sex and masturbation, reported a landmark study into a long-taboo subject. Sexual activity reported among the 3,005 men and women who participated in the survey did decrease with age, particularly among the oldest participants -- from 73 percent among those 57 to 64 years of age to 53 percent among those 65 to 74 years of age to 26 percent among those 75 to 85 years of age. ... "Hopefully, this opens the door for conversation that might counter stereotypes," Lindau told reporters in a conference call. "If we regard older people as asexual, particularly as physicians, we really miss an opportunity to do important counseling and interventions for people who may benefit from them." - CNN

















  • Virtual porn can be just as, if not more, satisfying than the real thing, asserts Sadako Shikami, a "Second Life" escort, putting emphasis on Second Life's sex-related users, scripts and objects as being the pinnacle of today's virtual, interactive sex. Regarding the current state of virtual porn online, "even though a real person created it, it's just a picture, a painting, a special effect. The main difference between hentai anime or Poser porn and Second Life porn is that there's a real person behind the avatar, or the furry, or the cartoon," maintains Sadako. "You can live out your wildest fantasies with a real person who shares them."
  • Development agencies have conventionally viewed sexuality as a health issue. Sex has been regarded as a source of danger, harm and disease. The words `love', `desire' and `pleasure' are absent from the development lexicon. - Institute of Development Studies, Sussex
  • Germany’s legal sex industry is estimated to make $18 billion annually [2006].
    Meaningful sex has to be value based. Values are personal. Each situation that has sexual energy in it, involves the whole human being and their entire value system. My values may be different from yours, and I have no right to be the moral judge of anyone's values. It is important, however, to have core values, and respect them. Without values, we become spiritually bankrupt. Sexual experience will never cause problems and will always be joyful, if lovers share the same values. - Deepak Chopra
  • The growth of electronically mediated sex will presumably reduce the number of flesh-to-flesh sex acts. There are millions of people in the industrialized world who spend significant amounts of time and money on Internet porn, sex chat, voyeur cams and interacting with sexual partners through Web cams and audio interfaces.

    These media will soon be joined by "haptic" and "teledildonic" equipment that will communicate a partner's caresses and allow you to feel them. Extrapolating to the latter 21st century, when full nanotechnology-based virtual reality is in use, we will be able to have as high-bandwidth a sexual relationship electronically as in the flesh. That will probably mean a lot more casual e-sex and more commercial e-sex. But for those special someones it will also mean more profound sex.

    Direct control of our brains will also mean that masturbation will be a lot more direct than the current manual methods. We will be able to directly stimulate our sexual pleasure centers pretty much invisibly, and as often as we like. Luckily we won't have to drive our cars manually anymore, or things could be very dangerous on the road. - James Hughes, Executive Director, IEET, bioethicist and sociologist
  • Catching sight of a pretty woman really is enough to throw a man's decision-making skills into disarray, a study suggests. The men's performance in the tests showed those who had been exposed to the "sexual cues" were more likely to accept an unfair offer than those who were not. Dr Siegfried DeWitte, one of the researchers who worked on the study, said: "We like to think we are all rational beings, but our research suggests ... that people with high testosterone levels are very vulnerable to sexual cues. The researchers are conducting similar tests with women. But so far, they have failed to find a visual stimulus which will affect their behaviour. - The Royal Society


    2006 Worldwide Pornography Revenues


















Join us at
the future of Sexuality
Thursday, November 29, 2007
Registration: 18:30-19:00, Conference: 19:00-21:15
Ticket Corner
Where: Waag Society, Nieuwmarkt 4, 1012 CR Amsterdam [Center of the Nieuwmarkt]
The conference language is English.










Thursday, October 25, 2007

LIVE BROADCAST: the future of Google

Club of Amsterdam about
the future of GOOGLE and its impact on Media and Entertainment
Thursday, October 25, 2007

Conference: 19:00-21:15

Watch our LIVE BROADCAST sponsored by Innergy Creations
http://www.innergybv.biz/coa/mobilecast

Monday, October 22, 2007

Alexandria burned - securing knowledge access in the age of Google

by Cynthia M. Gayton

"We are all worried about the new librarian. The man must be worthy, and mature, and wise. … That is all there is to it."
The Name of the Rose, Umberto Eco

Abstract
This article expands upon my previous VINE article entitled 'Legal Issues facing the Knowledge Economy in the 21st Century' by concentrating on one main topic, that of knowledge access specifically to works available currently in analog form. Most libraries face the daunting task of preserving their hard copy collections in a way not contemplated by Johan Gutenberg. How to preserve library collections in a manner permitted under copyright law is the primary legal issue, but the legal analysis does not end there. Contract, licensing, and vendor-driven solutions may leave the ultimate user without access to vital resources heretofore only available within the physical library environment. I will address not only copyright issues and related fair use and first sale doctrines, but antitrust issues, and the relationship between fair use and the 5th amendment. The recently initiated Google Library Project offers a useful test scenario as the debate continues between traditional hardcopy volumes and their digital counterparts. By way of analogy, I will compare the ancient Alexandrian libraries with that proposed by Google.

****
Perhaps by the time you read this article the dilemma presented here will be resolved. Such is the nature of the Internet. In the event that the dilemma is not resolved, this article will expand upon some ideas discussed in my last article on legal issues in the knowledge-based economy for the 21st century. My focus will be almost entirely on knowledge access. Specifically, I will review the legal issues facing an entity that is attempting to create a library containing the world's books and making that library available for search purposes online.

Initially, I will show that the issues being faced by the above-identified communities are not unique to this century, or even the past thousand years. I have chosen as an analogy the lost libraries of ancient Alexandria in Egypt as the starting point. Next, I will outline contemporary legal issues that face an organization attempting to emulate the intent of the Ptolemies, most of which were not considered by the founders of the original "world library". I will compare the methods used by the knowledge acquirers in the time of the pharaohs with those used by mere mortals. Finally, I will identify the legal hurdles facing a commercial online digital library which will be laws relating to copyright, private property, and antitrust.

[...]

Google has an opportunity, although not a duty, to set precedents for the future digital archives of not only an American cultural heritage, but one for the expanse of human history. A good faith effort to cooperate with the authors and publishers whose works populate their digital space by following the laws already forged by public debate should not be ignored in favor of technological expediency and perhaps ephemeral and temporary gain. What is at stake here is not just providing an Internet search service that also happens to link search results with commercial advertisements, but a tool assisting with knowledge accumulation and access for generations."

You can download the full article as a pdf file incl. resources and credentials click here


Visit out next event:

the future of Google
and its impact on Media and Entertainment
Thursday, October 25, 2007
Registration: 18:30-19:00, Conference: 19:00-21:15
Tickets: Ticket Corner
De Industrieele Groote Club, Dam 27, Amsterdam
The conference language is English.

The speakers are
Nils Rooijmans, Head of Search and R&D, ilse media: Search Culture
Mario de Vries, Business Consultant, Triple P: “Any resemblance with real life is purely coincidal”
Rocco van den Berg, Head of Business Development & Licensing, Endemol The Netherlands: The increase of serious video channels
Arjen Kamphuis, Futurist, Owner, KMPHS: Futureshock - Dealing with rapid and fundamental change
Moderated by Simon Jones, University of Amsterdam

We would like to thank our supporter: Info.nl

Thursday, September 06, 2007

Are chimeras part of our future?

by Michael Akerib, InnovaX


In zoology, a chimera is an animal containing genetic material from parents of two or more distinctly different species. Chimeras are found in nature when fertilized eggs fuse or when a fertilized egg fuses with a sperm other than the one that fertilized the egg.

Chimeras can breed but only part of the genetic material is transmitted to the offspring.

There is a major difference between chimeras and hybrids. Hybrids, such as the mule, are formed from the interaction between a sperm and an ovule of two different species, while a hybrid is formed from the mixing of the cells of two zygotes.

Experiments have been undertaken of transplanting embryonic cells of a human fetus into an animal embryo. The first such human / animal chimera has reportedly been created at the Shanghai Second Medical University in China where human and rat cells were fused.

While the creation of animal / animal chimeras may have one of several objectives such as the understanding of embryonic development or the carrying of fetuses of animal of protected species, animal / human embryos while also enabling researchers to study the behavior of human cells in experiments that could not be carried out on humans, they also serve a different purpose, namely the production of human stem cells. This is particularly true in countries that do not allow the use of discarded embryos from fertility clinics for that use.

There are also several projects to use animal / human chimeras to produce cells or organs for use in patients. Thus, sheep at the University of Nevada have human liver cells.

Biologists are clearly redesigning life. Rather than redesigning our environment to suit human life, they will redesign life to suit the needs of humans.

Redesigning life starts from the premise that we can imagine and create a better world than the one we live in today.

Two types of considerations arise. The first is medical while the second is ethical.

During the process of creating a chimera by injecting human cells into an animal embryo, a major unknown remains the extent to which such cells will migrate into the various organs of the body and thus ‘humanize’ the animal. Conversely, if animal cells are introduced into a human fetus, there would be a degree of ‘animalization’ of the human. The question of degree also arises from the perspective of the observer who may, or many not, recognize the result as part of an existing species or not.

An obvious danger in transplanting cells or organs from a chimera to a human is that of transmitting animal diseases to humans. There is no obvious solution as to how this could be prevented.

We are also assuming that our knowledge of the genetic mechanisms is, or will be in the future, sufficient to prevent unexpected developments and side effects. But will this be the case?

Assuming the ideology of those who represent the people, politicians for the most part, leads them to allow the creation of chimeras and scientists are successful in overcoming the numerous technological barriers that inevitably will present themselves, a number of ethical question arise.

Ethical issues can be sub-divided as follows:

  • Should men change the destiny of the race by considering genes as objects? In other words, should human selection replace natural selection thus permanently altering our relationship with our environment?
  • Evolution being partly synonymous with selection through competition, at least to some extent, and assuming the chimeras cannot compete with humans, could they evolve?
  • Are we creating chimeras because we understand unconsciously that the world will be devoid of other species as the world’s biodiversity is shrinking? Chimeras as ersatz of the animals we are eliminating from the face of the earth …
  • Chimeras themselves become objects rather than animals or humans, and the birth process is replaced by a manufacturing process.
  • If so who should hold the decision-making power to decide which genes should be kept and which altered? What role will scientists play in this process?
  • Should chimeras be considered as a form of domesticated animals, pets, or rather as a human sub-species? If the latter is the case, is it less of an ethical issue to experiment on or destroy them than it is to experiment on, or destroy, human life. This is particularly true of chimeras in which human brain cells are implanted or developed in other primates.
  • What kind of rights would chimeras have, considering that animal rights vary from country to country and in some are totally non-existent
  • Were chimeras to breed with humans, what status would be that of the offspring?
  • Could a sub-human species be thus produced to perform tasks humans refuse doing or simply to be exhibited in zoos or circuses?
  • Could we create a breed of chimeras that can look forward into time and realize their own mortality?
  • Are we entering an era of post-humanity where humans as we know them will serve no useful purpose any more? Will this be a harbinger of chaos with multitudes of chimeras and few, if any, real human beings?

The issues are so important that they question our very sense of morality

To these purely ethical questions, one must add religious issues, which are of quite a different nature and need not necessarily concern those of us who are non-believers, agnostics or atheists. They are therefore not covered here.

Science has always made strides forward. We know of no technology that could advance the interests of humanity that has been discarded, however dangerous its outcome could be, even when we perceived the long-term consequences of adopting it.

In fact, the final question with regards to chimeras is our willingness to live in a very different world, in other words, our acceptance of profound change. Acceptance, perhaps, rather than intention. Sliding into post-humanity rather than making a decisive well-informed step.

Thus, the successful creation of chimeras, and their adoption as an ordinary object of our technological creativity, would be an alternative foundation to a post-human society.

Saturday, September 01, 2007

Importance of Multiculturalism Expertise, and a Program to Acquire It

By Dr. V. H. Manek Kirpalani and Dr. Leif Thomas Olsen

Multiculturalism is growing by leaps and bounds due to three driving forces.

Ø Multinational Enterprises with their explosive expansions into different regions.
Ø Emigration and Immigration.
Ø Increased Communication Speed and the Internet Highway.

The rationale for the growth of these driving forces and the environment they create are the following:

The Rationale for Growth of Multiculturalism

Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) have been growing at some 8% a year in terms of total revenues for the last 50 years or so. The environment of globalization has helped. International trade talks have aided the creation of a substantially large world market for many products and services. Other types of international cooperation have helped speed up growth in previously stagnant economies by providing investment and credit opportunities across the globe. Thus the business environment has encouraged the expansion of MNE products and services, and facilitated the internationalization of production. The latter has allowed the MNEs to produce and/or purchase many components from countries with lower costs of production. Today the total revenue of MNEs is greater than the GDP of any country in the world, even greater than that of the USA which produces roughly 25% of the world’s GDP. Moreover the MNEs dominate world trade with a roughly 60% overall share of this trade. The MNEs thus need the cross-cultural expertise to produce and market their products and services in countries worldwide, to deal with component suppliers from different cultures, and to manage employees who come from diverse countries and cultures. Further the successful manager and/or business owner must learn about a range of cross-cultural experience in order to continue their success. Furthermore every manager and policy maker in business or government and its public sector organizations has to deal sooner or later with people from different cultures who are workers or consumers.


Emigration and immigration provide other driving forces that contribute to the creation of diverse cross-cultural environments in many countries. All in all it is estimated that worldwide over 600 million people or some 10% of the world’s population are living in countries outside their country of origin. The richer North American and Western economies have served as a magnet to draw immigration from all over the world. The USA and Canada have been importing well over one million people a year as immigrants from overseas for the last 50 years. Further, today the USA has some 50 million Hispanic immigrants, legal and illegal (the term for the latter is ‘undocumented’). The European Union has served as a draw for immigrants from the colonies of its imperial countries. Furthermore today it is seeing a strong flow of people from its Central and Eastern European segments into its Western regions. Emigration from China and India has been large over the last 100 years or so.

Increased communication speed and its constantly decreasing costs, coupled with the Internet highway and the flow of information technology have resulted in more direct communication between head offices and subsidiaries, emigrants / immigrants and their original home bases, and by the flow of global promotion of products and services, and of global news via established outlets such as CNN and BBC World, as well as more recent additions, such as Al Jazeera and Russia Today.

Demand and Supply of Graduates with Multicultural Expertise

All the above developments have increased the need for cross-cultural expertise. But the demand for graduates, trained with the capability of doing well in multicultural environments, is far greater than the supply.

In a multitudinal world, where issues like sustainable development, shareholders' value and ethnic-religious conflicts are all 'hot', and the North-South divide seems to be getting wider by the day, corporate, technical, political managers and professionals must become more able to see beyond their own respective area of direct involvement and responsibility. Future leaders and managers have a rapidly growing social responsibility to the society their employing organization operates within - a task that current management training programs tend to underestimate. An elective course or two on good governance or socially responsible investments is unlikely to change the thinking deeply enough, especially as they usually are just electives rather than high-profile mandatory courses. Moreover, snapshot courses are no longer enough. One must go deeper and develop knowledge and thorough understanding of the subjects that are being learnt.

If future professionals and academics, whether in business, governance or technology, have to keep pace with todays, and even more so tomorrow's, development speed, a different approach must be instilled in people through the educational system. The ambition of a learning program must be to install a multi-cultural base and a more socio-economic oriented leadership focus. The graduate with such leadership training will be able to apply it in a scientific or social environment, and/or in a corporate or political context. Leaders and managers who do understand their responsibility in its broadest meaning will also understand that there is no contradiction between ROI and social responsibility. A good example of this lies in the industrial tradition that built most of the companies now considered backbones of the societies from which they emerged. Had it not been for hardworking entrepreneurs with very long-term vision and far-reaching social responsibilities, there would be no Ford Motor Co, no Sony Corporation, no IKEA and no TSMC (Taiwan's largest chip manufacturer). Only leaders who can read both the social and the financial sides of the socio-economic equation will succeed.

Program to Acquire Multicultural Expertise

The overall objective of a multicultural expertise program for managers across the corporate, political and social spectra must be to offer a curriculum with a leadership focus that can be adjusted to the respective cultural and socio-economic environments in which it is to be consumed. For managers with social or political ambitions, such cultural sensitivity is already a 'must'. Nevertheless it is rare to find evidence for development of this insight when looking at the curricula offered by most business institutions.

Future managers must develop good abilities to see different societies in different lights. The same goes for social workers, politicians, and international officials, such as those at the International Monetary Fund, United Nations, WTO, and the World Bank. It once took an almost nationwide boycott of McDonalds' hamburgers in India before McDonald executives realized that their products had to be diversified for cultural reasons; righteous Hindus found it unacceptable to eat beef. Nowadays all international fast food chains offer localized menus. The 2005/06 boycott of Danish products of any sort in many Muslim markets, as a result of what came to be known as the 'Mohammed-cartoon incident', indicates how important cultural understanding is in an increasingly global marketplace.

A program designed to address the need to acquire multicultural expertise should build on three interrelated cornerstones. Each one is outlined with its underlying logic.

Corner Stone 1:

Multitude culture-sensitive. It must not assume a global westernized mono-culture such as most MBA programs tend to do.

Underlying Logic:

The cultural issue will never go away, and multitude culture-sensitive importance will increase once China, India, Korea and other countries with different cultures gain fuller influence in global matters.

Corner Stone 2:

Open social platform. Rather than viewing management as a limited task

Underlying Logic:

The management of just about any entity, whether public or private, now affects significantly larger circles of society than it used to do. The Internet as well as other open access platforms also has dramatically increased the possibility for information-sharing. This have allowed also participative democracy representatives, who for long mainly expressed their views and opinions through NGOs and/or street rallies, access to, and increasingly efficient use of, the kind of information that was formerly controlled by ´the establishment elite,’

Corner Stone 3:

Future oriented. Rather than business-as-usual.

Underlying Logic:

The speed of development in general and technical development in particular, is in-creasing. Therefore to be successful a future orientation in thinking and strategy is necessary.

Rushmore University New P2M Program

The new Rushmore University P2M program emphasizes the post-modern need for a global horizon with a depth understanding of cultural silos. . It is worth looking at and can be seen at Rushmore's website www.rushmore.edu. It consists of 30 credits spread over the following five courses plus a thesis in your preferred cultural area. :


1. World Religions and Philosophies

Hinduism, Confucianism, Buddhism, Judaism, Christianity, Islam are the six major religions that historically, as well as in terms of current affairs, have a global impact. Metaphysics, Ethnocentrism, Relativism, Socio-biology, Individualism, Collectivism, Utilitarianism and Pacifism are some philosophies that also, with varying success influenced, or tried to influence, our societies over time. Students are requested to analyze at least three different accounts of each one of these.

2. World History as Viewed by the World's Major -isms

Many ideas have grown so strong over time so they developed into social and/or political systems, entirely governing the societies over which they wrestled control. The most influential ones, here identified as "-isms", are Feudalism, Capitalism, Imperialism, Nationalism, Colonialism, Modernism, Liberalism, Post-Modernism, Neo-liberalism, Secularism, Globalism Consensus, Fundamentalism, and Good Governance-ism. The course will cover all these, and some others, in depth.

3. A Changing World: Ecology, Anthropology, Demography and Economic Geography

Climate-change is only the most recent of many pressing issues showing how interlinked are ecology, anthropology, demography and economic geography. When the UN's Security Council finally took this issue on in 2007, it simply confirmed what was already well known: migration - whether caused by war, economic inequality or climate-change - is a serious cause of concern, whereas millions of people are moving, and will continue to move, to new localities, in turn affecting those millions of people who already live there. We must learn how to adapt to it, and make good from the situation it creates. This requires leaders and managers with the right abilities and a strong social sensitivity. These aspects will also be discussed in depth.

4. Future-Studies Related to Cross-Cultural Issues, including Social Research Methodology

Future-studies related to cross-cultural issues can help predict developments and prevent problems, assuming they build on a good methodological platform. This course on such future studies as a means to understand and influence the future, therefore also includes social research methodology.

5. Cross-cultural / Interdisciplinary Interaction and Psychology

With globalization comes cultural interaction. There is very little evidence to say that a homogeneous global culture will develop. It is more likely that the concept of glocal - a mix of the two words global and local - will best describe the future world order.

To understand and facilitate this development one must understand what constitutes a culture, and how and why cultures clash. Cultures are however not only social, they can also be religious, professional, disciplinary or otherwise. By understanding the psychology and methodology of bridging cultures one can help not only peoples from different parts of the world to co-habitation, but also specialists from different disciplines to co-operation. Using such insights one can also more easily understand how the world can develop, as development always is a result of such co-habitation and co-operation.

6. Thesis: Linking directly to a Chosen Elective

Students are asked to submit a thesis discussing one of the four electives listed under item 6.1 to 6.4 below. They are:

6.1 Capacity Building for Diverse Cultures, focusing on managing human capacity creation and development, as well as evolutionary processes and technology transfer on a micro as well as macro level.

6.2 Structures and Systems, analyzing how institution-building processes take place; how they are managed and influenced, including not only the processes aimed at developing a State's administrative and juridical bodies, but also those developing capital markets and political - as well as multilateral - institutions.

6.3 Inter-Cultural Leadership, through (i) case research based on the past, (ii) scenario building based on the future, communication theory and/or technology, and (iii) negotiation techniques looking towards the future.

6.4 Western-styled Corporate Philosophy; intended for those non-westerners who wish to have a thorough introduction to western corporate philosophy and behaviour. This thesis would typically focus on similarities and differences between your own cultural setting and the type of cultural setting that the western-styled corporate philosophy would assume. It should also discuss how your own cultural tradition can serve as a platform not only for a local enterprise, but for an internationally viable business model. Further, it should identify steps for how western MNEs can adapt to local conditions, not only in order to respect cultural diversity, but also to better tap into markets that are culturally sensitive.

Leaders who possess the insights that this program offers will be better suited to meet the challenges that our future has in store for us, no matter where we live or in which segment of the society we wish to succeed.

Four Planets

by Chris Thomson, School of Consciousness






If the whole world were to consume energy and resources at the same rate as the USA, we would require approximately four planets to meet the demand. Clearly we do not have four planets. Some might therefore think it odd that we are constantly encouraged to consume more and produce more. Despite increasing evidence to the contrary, economic growth is still seen in mainstream and official circles as highly desirable.

It seems less odd when we remind ourselves that we inhabit an Alice in Wonderland world of topsy-turvy values, in which many of us overprovide for our material needs - getting fat, sad and unhealthy in the process - while underproviding for our spiritual needs for peace, beauty, love, truth and deeper meaning - getting anxious, confused and unhappy in the process.

There is widespread recognition that all is not well. There is a sense of deep malaise that makes many of us uncomfortable. We hear every day about drugs, crime, violence, corruption, war, poverty and inequality, disease, pollution and many other problems. But we continue to believe that by creating even more wealth and money, we will be able to solve these problems. More money is widely regarded as the universal solution, or at least the precondition.

We talk glibly about economic growth, but how many of us ever stop to ask ourselves what we mean by this? When we take a closer look, we discover that many of the things that are growing are undesirable - such as traffic, crime, stress, noise, ugliness, pollution, violence, dishonesty, greed, unhappiness, inequality, and pressure on the environment. We don’t like these things, but we have a schizophrenic attitude to them because some of them register as growth in the economy, which we think is desirable. Our chief measure of growth, GDP, registers the bad and the ugly as well as the good, without telling us which is which.

GDP is the total of all those transactions in an economy where money officially changes hands. At first glance, this looks perfectly reasonable. But a closer look reveals that GDP registers the costs of growth as if they were benefits. If dealing with crime, congestion, pollution, and medically treating an unhealthy population involve legal money transactions, as they clearly do, then these costs will be shown as part of GDP. If an increasing proportion of our GDP is going on this kind of expenditure, as it is, are we justified in saying that we are doing well?

In any event, it does not make sense for countries to compare themselves with each other on the basis of GDP when so much economic activity in so many countries is either outside the official economy (transactions involving cash but which do not get recorded) or does not involve money at all (e.g. people doing housework or other unpaid work or bartering goods and services).


How do we know whether we are doing well?
There are better ways of assessing how we are doing as a society. The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) is one of them and the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) is another. It is significant that although GDP, ISEW and GPI grew at about the same rate in the UK, USA, and Germany until the early 1970’s, ISEW and GPI declined after that point, while GDP kept growing. If ISEW and GPI are better indicators of what is really happening, this tells us that, although we were experiencing economic growth, things were getting worse, not better. Comparisons between ISEW and GDP should tell us that, after a certain point in the development of any economy, the pursuit of economic growth causes at least as many problems as it purports to solve. In economically developed countries, promoting yet more growth in the hope that it will ultimately enable us to solve our problems is rather like using petrol to try to put out a fire.

Of course it is true that when people do not have their basic needs met, there is clearly a case to be made for growth. Economic development is undoubtedly required in those parts of the world where there is inadequate water, food, shelter, and health-care and education. However, once these basic needs are met, the desirability of more growth becomes increasingly questionable, especially when it is associated with a form of “development” that usually means disrupting the sustainable patterns of centuries. We make the mistake of thinking that because some people have less money or material wealth, they are worse off. Happiness is not necessarily synonymous with having more.

Indeed, after a certain stage has been reached, economic growth is rarely synonymous with human development. On the contrary, it is closely associated with the many social problems of our times, and with pressures to work longer and harder and to spend more. This begs the question: will this process - of having to work harder, and having to become more competitive - ever stop, or will it go on until the end of time as we keep trying to overtake each other in order to get ahead? That is a dismal prospect. Is it not time to make well-being, human development and happiness the central purposes of society? And is it not time to acknowledge that these desirable goals may be in fundamental conflict with the goals of economic growth and ever increasing competitiveness?


Truly Sustainable Human Development
There are some chinks of light. The mood is changing - away from the focus on economic growth pure and simple. The Holy Grail of many governments these days is “to promote economically, environmentally and socially sustainable development”. At the same time, many businesses are trying to tread the fine line between being, on the one hand, profitable and competitive and, on the other hand, socially and environmentally responsible. Increasingly, businesses know that they need the good society. They need happy, healthy, educated, energetic, creative people, and an attractive natural and built environment. The challenge remains: how to have this and to pursue profit and competitiveness at the same time?

Perhaps a better question is: can we evolve and practise a form of socio-economic development that automatically enhances personal growth, wellbeing, social justice, and environmental improvement? Can we, in other words, move away from a world based on competition for, and exploitation of, people and resources to a world based on cooperation and the wise development of people and the planet? The answer to these questions has to be yes. If it is not, then we are in serious trouble. If we carry on pursuing material growth and the belief that more money is the answer to most of our problems, while treating the other two points of the triangle - people and the environment - as secondary to the main objective, the chances are that things will only get worse. Yet we are unlikely to stop carrying on as we are while we continue to subscribe to the belief that more is better. So long as economic growth remains the central purpose, we will continue to have to use specifically targeted policies to try to counteract the negative fallout of our obsession with material things and money. Meanwhile, the contrast between the excited expectations generated by the “knowledge economy” and the deterioration of the earth’s ecosystem could not be greater.

Contrary to the belief in some circles, sustainable development does not mean “economic growth as usual, while keeping a weather eye on the environment”, which is how the term is often interpreted. Sustainable development is as much about the sustainability of society and culture as it is about the sustainability of the economy and the environment. After all, without a society there can be no economy. Increasingly, people are asking: are we living to work or working to live? Does society exist to serve the economy or does the economy exist to serve society? Lying behind these questions is the bigger question: what is it that we really want?

However, we are unlikely to get to the point of knowing what we really want unless we make this possible for ourselves. This would mean giving ourselves the space and time to think and feel more deeply about what we are doing and why we are doing it. At present, much of our thinking is carried out in knee-jerk reactive mode, and many of our actions reflect this. There is an urgent need for deeper, reflective thinking.

Let us assume that we were able, as individuals and as communities, to work out what we really want in life and what we want to be as a society. We would then need to find ways of getting there, and we would also need to design much better indicators to tell us whether or not we are on track. In my view, we will get there only if the means are the same as the ends. Paul Ekins expressed this beautifully in his book “Wealth Beyond Measure”:

“Many enlightened capitalists, and socialists who connive with them for the sake of economic growth, believe that solving the problems of production will lead people, once they have enough, to turn towards the higher things of life: beauty, spirit, art, love. They are wrong. Making the market the principal instrument of human development has transformed it - in the form of shopping - into society’s principal cultural expression. It is no use changing the goals from economic growth to basic needs or sustainability, for example, if the means, the economics, remains the same. It is the means that determine where we end up. The challenge is not only to decide on another destination…but also to design an economics, and a development process to go with it, that is as sustainable, participatory, equitable and satisfying as the end that is in view.”

Many of us are confused. On the one hand, we are being asked to work harder, to be more flexible, and to be more enterprising and competitive, so that we can stay ahead of each other, other companies and other countries. We are caught up in what seems to be an endless race for competitive advantage, yet many of us instinctively feel that we - and the world - cannot continue this way. At the same time, we are being asked to do our small bit to help promote social justice and environmental sustainability. It feels very much as if we are being asked to go faster and slower simultaneously.

The “central purpose” of the modern world, and of most countries and many organisations, seems to be perpetual economic growth. Anyone who understands how systems work will know how important a system’s central purpose is. It literally determines what the system looks like and how it functions. If the world’s central purpose really is economic growth, then all other “purposes”, such as justice, equality, ecology and health, will always take second place. And the values of the system will always reflect the central purpose. It is no accident that we live in an age of rampant materialism. It is interesting to reflect that one of the fastest growing industries in the USA is the self-storage industry. This is where many Americans store goods that they cannot keep in their house or garage, because they have no more space. The industry reports the owners of these additional goods never see them again, once they have been put into storage. This suggests that, for many people in the modern world, the act of buying things is just as important, if not more so, than actually having them.

We urgently need a new central purpose for the world. And the world as a whole will have to decide what it wants this to be. My own personal preference is that our new central purpose be the spiritual development of the human being, this planet and everything in it and on it. I freely admit that, when I look around me at a world that seems to getting madder by the day, such a central purpose feels impossible. Yet, I wonder how long we can continue spiralling downwards, ever deeper into materialism. We keep getting wake-up calls – wars, natural disasters, man-made disasters etc. – and each time we wake up for a few days or weeks. But we soon go back to sleep again and get back on the materialist merry-go-round. How loud and painful will the wake-calls have to be before we really take notice?

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

Meetings in 2020

This white paper is provided to the members of the Club of Amsterdam and the members of the Community of Interest by the AMI Consortium as part of an ongoing initiative to increase global study and understanding of the human-to-human communications and the future of technology-assisted meetings using automation and intelligent agents in an environment of virtually unlimited processing and bandwidth resources.

This white paper is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard of the future of meetings. It is made available by the AMI Consortium, with the permission of ParkWood Advisors LLC, with the understanding that the intent is not to render legal, investment, accounting or other professional advisory services.

If investment advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. Requests for permission to reuse the contents of this document or for further information about its contents should be addressed to John Parkinson at ParkWood Advisors LLC.



Preface
Speaking and digitally publishing about a subject are two very, very different things. In the case of predicting the future, however, the tangible results may be the same.

When speaking about meetings in 2020, a presenter has a lot of liberty because chances are relatively high that no one in the audience will remember what he or she said about the subject by 2020. And, in contrast with what you might expect, a digitally published/stored archive of the same concepts will probably also be “lost” for all intents and purposes. For John Parkinson, Chairman and Managing Partner of ParkWood Advisors LLC, the risk of his words fading and disappearing long before the accuracy of his predictions are tested just comes with the territory.

Parkinson introduced his talk, a keynote address at the Wainhouse Research European Forum 2006 in Berlin entitled “Meetings in 2020,” with a touching reminder that predictions of the future — even the future of technology over the past 50 years — have more frequently been wrong than right.

All predictions/forecasts and recommendations made in this paper are the rights and responsibilities of ParkWood Advisors LLC.

Only time will tell how well the words of 2006 will fit the future.

Christine Perey, AMI Consortium Technology Transfer


Download the report as *.pdf click here

Monday, July 30, 2007

A Second Enlightenment

by Chris Thomson, School of Consciousness

There was a time when my home country, Scotland, punched well above her weight in inventiveness. Many things that we now take for granted had their origin in Scotland. The list is long – television, refrigerator, microwave ovens, tarred roads, pneumatic tyres, golf, the steam engine, radar, modern banking, antisepsis, antibiotics, quinine, the fax machine, logarithms, iron bridges, and many other things. Scotland’s inventiveness is relatively well known.

What is not so well known is that much of the intellectual basis for the modern world was developed in Scotland, during the Scottish Enlightenment (roughly 1740-90). Of the personalities involved, Adam Smith and David Hume are the best known, but there were others who made important contributions, such as Thomas Reid, Adam Ferguson and John Millar. It is difficult today to appreciate just how influential Scotland was in those days. Scotland’s intellectual leadership in that era was so powerful that Voltaire was moved to write: “...we look to Scotland for all our ideas of civilisation.”

The First Enlightenment gave us modernity, namely the ideas, values and practices that have shaped the modern world. In other words, it gave us the modern economy, modern medicine, modern education, modern science and modern government. Few would deny that, for a long time, modernity made life better and easier for many people. It raised the material living standards of many; it increased life expectancy; it enabled us to address many forms of ill health that had gone unaddressed before; it brought education to the majority; it vastly increased our knowledge of the physical world; it gave us some very useful technology; and, in theory at least, it allowed most adults to participate in the big decisions that affect them.

Modernity – past its sell-by date
However, something has gone very wrong. We have just come through the most murderous, destructive century in human history, with major holocausts on every continent, in which over 150 million were slaughtered in systematic massacres of racial, ethnic, political and religious groups. The present century has not begun well. As the 21st Century gets under way, wars are raging on three continents, inequality within and between nations continues to increase, mental and emotional illnesses are epidemic, social breakdown is becoming the norm, and nature and the planet are more seriously threatened than ever.

While it is true that many of us are materially richer than ever, we are in many important respects poorer than ever. We have more money and things than we ever had, yet how many of us are truly happy? We receive more schooling and training than ever, yet greed and superficiality are the hallmarks of modern culture. We have more technology and scientific knowledge than ever before, but we seem less able than ever to use them wisely. As Martin Luther King said: “Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power, we have guided missiles and misguided men.” And although we continue to call ourselves “democracies”, many of us feel that this has become a fiction and wonder what the point of voting is when the outcome of elections is determined in a few marginal constituencies and when prime ministers ignore the people’s views on major issues, such as war.

There is a growing sense that modernity, appropriate for its time, has outlived its usefulness and that any benefits it brings are now hugely outweighed by the problems it causes. What we have long assumed to be the main solution to our problems may have become their main cause. The economics, medicine, science, education and politics ushered in by the Enlightenment served us well for a long time, but they are no longer fit for purpose. The time has come to replace modernity with ideas, values and practices that are appropriate to the very different conditions of the 21st Century. The time has come, in other words, for a Second Enlightenment. Whatever else this turns out to be, it will take us beyond modernity and provide us with an economics, a medicine, an education, a science and a politics/governance that are better suited to the conditions of today. For me, a useful starting point in understanding what the Second Enlightenment needs to be is to get to the roots of modernity and to understand why it is causing so many problems.

The Roots of Modernity
Modernity has its roots in the worldview of modern science. At the heart of this worldview are some core beliefs (although many scientists would call these beliefs “facts”):

  • The universe and everything in it, ourselves included, is physical. Science may talk about a universe that consists only of “energy”, but they leave little doubt that they believe this energy to be physical
  • For science, there can be nothing beyond this physical universe
  • The universe has no intrinsic meaning or purpose
Science has become so powerful and influential that all metaphysical, religious and philosophical claims that contradict it tend to be rejected. Yet if, as science insists, the universe began suddenly for no reason (the “Big Bang”) and life on this planet emerged by chance, then the world that science wants us to believe in must be totally meaningless. The fact that this statement, as part of that world, must also be meaningless is little consolation! A life without meaning is a bleak life indeed, which is no doubt why millions of people around the world are desperately seeking for deeper, lasting meaning. There is little doubt in my mind that one of the main features of the modern world is loss of deeper meaning. A lot of people feel that there is little purpose in their lives. This is having far-reaching effects.

The modern world also suffers from loss of wisdom. If science rejects the accumulated wisdom of the ages in favour of its own empirically derived body of knowledge, then, since science is the dominant form of knowledge today, wisdom is effectively devalued. Our modern obsession with having to prove things has marginalised two important aspects of wisdom, namely intuition and common sense. Perhaps we should not be surprised that, with wisdom marginalised in these ways, we have become the most dangerous and destructive form of life on the planet.

Thirdly, the modern world is also characterised by loss of consciousness. By this I do not mean that we are all unconscious, although one might be forgiven for believing this at times. What I mean is that working to become more conscious has become a rarity in modern societies, partly because education in its true sense has largely been replaced by its opposite, schooling, but also because too many people have become overdependent on “experts” for their knowledge and wisdom and are therefore not in the habit of thinking for themselves. I think it is very significant that non-modern (“traditional”) societies place a very high value on the exploration and development of consciousness, while this is still regarded as a “fringe” activity in the so-called developed world.

Finally, I believe that the modernity has led to loss of ecology. The few societies around the world that have retained wisdom and deeper meaning know just how important it is to live in harmony with each other and with the planet. How many of us can put our hands on our hearts and say that we truly live in harmony with each other, let alone the planet? The modern world has made many of us desperate and insecure. It is little wonder that we engage in frenetic activity, such as work, shopping and travelling, when we should be finding ways to live gently and simply, with ourselves and with the world around us.

The Rise of Economism
When we add together loss of meaning, loss of wisdom, loss of consciousness and loss of ecology, there is not much left going for us. This may be one of the reasons that we now live in an era of unprecedented materialism. For many people, acquiring and consuming material things must seem like the only meaningful thing left for them to do. Our economics, our politics, our medicine, our education, our science, our politics and our culture have become steeped in material values and beliefs and the behaviours that flow from these. We are paying a high price for this, as we exploit and damage each other and the world. Meanwhile, it is short step from materialism and loss of wisdom to economism, one of the more recent additions to modernity.

Economism is the tendency to view the world through the lens of economics, to regard a country as an economy rather than as a society, and to believe that economic considerations and values rank higher than other ones. Economism is clearly evident these days and is a strong influence in business and political circles. It is a very narrow way of seeing the world. It prevents us from seeing whether we are making genuine progress. We assume that if there is more money and economic activity (economic growth), things are getting better. In reality, they might be getting worse and our devotion to economic growth and things economic is probably one of the main reasons for this.

The Second Enlightenment
All in all, modernity has given us a lot, but it came at a price. There are now many who believe that the price is now too high and that it is time to bring back meaning, wisdom, consciousness and ecology into our lives and to find ways of going beyond materialism. As we do this, I believe that we shall find that we are simultaneously creating a new kind of economics, a new kind of medicine, a new kind of education, a new kind of science, and a new kind of politics. It is impossible to predict exactly what they will be, but, if they are imbued with meaning, wisdom, consciousness and ecology, they may look something like this…
  • The new economics will be about enhancing people and planet, rather than exploiting them. At the heart of the new economics will be love and wisdom and ecology. This will bring with it new kinds of relationships, new kinds of businesses, and new kinds of institutions
  • The new medicine will be about self-reliance, wisdom and ecology in health and health-care, rather than about dependence on experts and technology. In the new medicine, medical treatment will be the exception rather than the rule, because the main focus will be on staying healthy
  • The new education will be about bringing out the best and uniqueness in each individual, rather than schooling them to believe certain things and to behave in certain ways, which is what usually happens today in our schools, colleges and universities. At the heart of the new education will be the development of wisdom, consciousness, meaning and ecology
  • The new science will be about applying the whole of the human being to the search for knowledge, rather than just the physical part, as at present. Science of the physical will continue to give us much that is useful. However, in the new science, knowledge of the physical will be complemented by knowledge of the spiritual, and that will make a big difference
  • The new politics will be about the return of power to people and communities, rather than having power concentrated in the hands of politicians and the few. At the heart of the new politics are two ideas - the idea that most power stays at the local level, where it belongs, and the idea that everyone has something useful to say and contribute
None of this is to suggest that we throw the baby out with the bathwater. There are many aspects of modernity worth retaining. For example, there is nothing intrinsically wrong with market economics. What is wrong is the set of values and goals that have come to inform it. And there is nothing intrinsically wrong with modern medicine. What is wrong is its belief that it can effectively address the whole spectrum of health problems, when in practice it is good at addressing only parts of the spectrum, such as mechanical repair, emergency intervention and infectious diseases. It is the same for modern education, modern science and modern government. Each has useful aspects that are worth preserving, but each is causing at least as many problems as it purports to solve. It is worth adding that the problems caused by modernity are exacerbated by politicians who, with few exceptions, are wedded to modernising, which is modernity in the form of government policies. The problems caused by modernity, such as climate change, stress and social disintegration, will just get worse so long as modernity remains the prevailing way of seeing and doing things. We will be able to solve the big problems of our time only when we replace modernity with a set of ideas and practices that are kinder to us and to the planet.

None of the above will be easy. People will not willingly give up the habits of a lifetime, and many in power will resist tooth and nail. In fact, if we are honest with ourselves, engaging in the kinds of changes I have suggested here will be the most difficult thing we ever do. Transformation may seem attractive in theory. In practice, it is usually messy and painful.

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Towards a Post-Human World?

by Michael Akerib, InnovaX

Post-humanity has been defined as a future society in which at least part of those living have capabilities substantially higher than those of the present variety of Homo sapiens, to the extent that they can no longer really be called humans. The capabilities can be physical, intellectual, emotional, or spiritual.

A post-human state can be reached by several means such as by medical treatment, through the use of biotechnology or by a symbiotic link to machines. Thus post-humanity will have been reached either by an augmentation of present capabilities or by a total redesign of the genetic basis.

The technologies used for enhancement could include a variety of anti-aging treatments, memory enhancing techniques relying mostly on synthetic or natural compounds possessing pharmacological properties and vastly increased knowledge through linking to information management tools.

The belief that these changes would create post-humans, and thus a post-human society, is that our evolution is not yet complete and that we can mold it with the use of technology. Adepts of a post-human society, trans-humanists, believe that the will of humans is determinant in deciding which direction the species should take, rather than allowing nature to decide on our future evolution.

Thus, if we decide that aging and death are diseases, and the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry seem to have decided that, we should eradicate them. This is obviously altering the course of nature, but supporters of the post-human idea make the point that one of the characteristics of humans is that they have always modified nature to their advantage – at least on a short system. The definite victory over certain diseases is an example put forward. Further, not everything that is natural is good for humanity.

Since trans-humanism insists on individual freedom, it recognizes the right of everyone to accept or refuse to become a post-human thus, incidentally, allowing for humans and post-humans to co-habit on the planet.

Writing about post-humanity is a little bit like writing about an extra-terrestrial society and we must make a distinction between speculation on future directions of science and science fiction. The main difference is that speculative science is a projetion into the future of possible developments of existing knoweldge and technology.

We can use our imagination but little else as we do not know what would be the feelings of a post-human or of a normal human being living in an essentially post-human society. For instance, what would it be like to live in a society in which all knowledge is immediately accessible just by thinking about an issue – a sort of implanted Wikepedia which would transmit to the mind information about any topic that the ‘person’ (would it still be a person?) would like to have access to. Super-powerful computers would be able to think, not just store and retrieve information. Minds of post-humans would be connected through an immense and efficient network. Similarities have been suggested with beehives or other animal colonies, the difference being that the behavior of the animals is driven by instinct and chemical signals rather than by a shared intelligence and knowledge.

In a post-human society, life would take place in cyberspace and one can speculate that either cyberspace will continue, as today, to exist in parallel with real space, or that it will replace it entirely. It will be a comfortable place to live in compared with the harsh realities of an increasingly hostile environment, or at lest one perceived as such.

In cyberspace post-humans will be able to choose the informational and knowledge niche they want to live in while having the possibility of moving from one space to another as they wish. Presumably they will also be able to select the gender in which they want to live unless, sexuality having become obsolete, post-humans will not be required to make such changes since they will be living in a post-biological world.

Post-humans could access an enormous wealth of knowledge; attain new realms of pleasure, live eternally without the threat of degenerative diseases. Eventually some post-humans might get rid of their bodily limitations altogether and become pure intellects. It has even been suggested that at an advanced stage, post-humans may decide to dispose of their bodies and transform themselves into information patterns. This translates into a denial of individuality and presupposes an equal mental power between the various members of the post-human grid. Groupthink would be pervasive and some form of censorship may well be implemented. Spoken language would have become obsolete. Possibly the same would happen to misunderstandings.

One can wonder if post-humans would ever be able to enjoy the pleasures of being alone with themselves …. In a world in which the network has replaced real space, it is most unlikely to allow solitary pleasures.

In an era of fears of pervasive insecurity and terrorist threats, the existence of such a network appears an invitation for destructive interference.

The concept of post-humanity arose from a 1993 seminal paper by Vernor Vinge in which he exposed his theory of singularity. A singularity is the point near a black hole after which it is impossible to predict the fate of an object reaching it.

In the same way, Vinge hypothesized that technological development will accelerate and reach such a speed that most probably by 2030 the technologies available will create a change as radical as that which took place when man evolved. The main reason for singularity to occur, always according to Vinge, would be a phenomenal step forward in human-computer integration, leading to an exponentially increased intelligence.

Issues of control also arise. Who would control the information? A centralized power system, or could anyone input data with or without a moderator? Would such a society move us away from the societal structure we have lived in until now and make us behave more like a colony of ants or bees or will we maintain our ability to think critically?

Presumably accession to post-humanism would be restricted to a chosen few and we would have a society in which humans and post-humans would live side by side. We might even have a scale of post-humanism with some individuals having chosen a larger number of post-human traits than others. The ultimate hybrid might be a totally abstract entity.

The ability for such diverse individuals to live peacefully together has been put into question and doubts have been cast on the ability to construct a legal system that would refrain from discrimination and violence. While examples of successful territorial sharing by very diverse individuals abound, so do contrary examples of discrimination and even genocide. Will post-humans resort to violence to occupy virtual space somewhat in the same manner that their ancestors fought to occupy physical space?

Certainly the concept of the family, at least as we have known it until now, including in the context of recomposed families, would be obsolete.

One would imagine that, at least initially, discrimination would come from the traditional humans against the post-humans. It is to be feared, however, that gradually post-humans would exploit others and perhaps even exterminate them.

Homo sapiens is the only species with no close relatives as no other human species has survived. Even our closest relatives, monkeys, are on the verge of becoming extinct.

Humans seem essentially driven by a single concept – destroying anything they may view as competition. Technology has assited them in reaching this objective. Will the ultimate success ironically be technology’s that will absorb humanity’s mind and consciousness in an apocalypse radically different from the one that the religions of the Book have been preaching? For them, indeed, death and resurrection and a Final Judgement are central to theology with death being the beginning of a new, richer, life.

Is post-humanity a dream threatening to transform itself into a nightmare or is it truly the final achievement of a humanity that was told it had fallen out of favor by an original sin?

Frank Tipler hypothesized that as the universe will come to its end, computational capacity will accelerate exponentially faster than time. He called that scenario the Omega Point. Is post-humanity the Omega Point of our species?

Humans have long imagined utopian societies, but these have often transformed themselves into inhuman hells. What of the heterotopia of post-humanity – is it a dream, the ultimate step of the evolution process or the final destruction of society as we know it?

Saturday, July 21, 2007

Comment on the "Global Peace Index"

by Leif Thomas Olsen, Associate Professor, Rushmore University



Global Peace Index
The Economist Intelligence Unit, in conjunction with an international team of academics and peace experts, has compiled an innovative new Global Peace Index (GPI), which ranks 121 nations according to their relative peacefulness. ...

Leif Thomas Olsen: Reading about an important and probably very serious attempt to establish a Global Peace Index, the article itself sends a strong signal indeed regarding the difficulty in doing this. This signal (divided into two paragraphs as if to divert attention from the link between the two sentences), reads as follows - when put together:

"This project has approached the task on two fronts— the first aim is to produce a scoring model and global peace index that ranks 120 nations by their relative states of peace using 24 indicators. (...) As with all indexes of this type, there are issues of bias and arbitrariness in the factors that are chosen to assess peacefulness and, even more seriously, in assigning weights to the different indicators (measured on a comparable and meaningful scale) to produce a single synthetic measure."

This problem alone makes this a very difficult task - especially if one aspires to be 'global'. However, when looking to the members of the research team who made the choices of indicators and weights, one cannot but get surprised.

Three come from - or are at least based in - Australia, all of whom carry typical western names. Three are Europeans, or at least based in Europe (Spain, Holland and Sweden), all of whom also carry typical western names. Two more participants also carry typical western names, one coming from (and/or based in) Canada, the other with an un-stated origin/domicile. Only one has a non-western name - Associate Professor Mohammed Abu-Nimer. He however represents the School of International Service, American University, Washington DC, USA - hardly a place where you would find a critic of the western way of presenting itself as 'the cradle of all good'.

The article does acknowledge that the indicators and weights "have been made following close and extensive consultation with an international panel of experts." However, who were on this panel is not disclosed, indicating they also typically represent the same type of societies as do the researchers themselves.

Why were not any Chinese, Japanese, Indian, Russian and/or South African professors invited to join the research team? Why were no researchers / co-authors involved who at least may have questioned the very assumptions the group used as research-premises? Are there no suitable academics to invite from the countries ranked low on the list - or was the team really surprised to find that Iraq and Sudan came at the very bottom?

This Index is an echo of the good ol' West and the Rest-approach. It is sad - but not at all surprising for a project sponsored by the Economist. Look at the two very different Happiness Indexes presented last year. One put all western nations at the top, with the relatively speaking fairly racist Denmark as number 1. The second one put all western nations from mid-rank to the very bottom, with the US ranked on par with several former East European dictatorships and a number of African countries in the Sahara-belt.One never stops getting surprised at how narrow the western mind is - not when it comes to measuring things (for which it seems well equipped), but when it comes to 'include'. The ghost of 'deduction' haunts a world that needs 'induction'. The Global Peace Index seems to be yet another example of this.



Friday, July 20, 2007

EFMN correspondents’ day 2007: Foresight and Europe

This year’s European Foresight Monitoring Network (EFMN) correspondents’ day takes place in Brussels on the 24th -25th September. The network comprises European policy professionals, foresight experts and practitioners as well as analysts of science, technology and innovation related issues. For details see the new EFMN website.

The aim of the EFMN correspondent’s day is to infuse the so far largely virtual EFMN community with real life. The event itself strikes a good balance between presentations of interesting foresight content and the opportunity to network with like minded professionals. We have invited a number of interesting speakers on the topic of ‘Europe and Foresight’ covering the whole range from policy-makers, corporate foresight as well as policy foresight practitioners. For details download the
detailed outline of the event.

The event is primarily targeted towards the EFMN correspondents. But as the EFMN is always interested to grow the network of correspondents the event is open to anyone interested as long as capacity is available. Attendance is furthermore free of charge. The event takes place at the Brussels University Foundation from the 24th – 25th September 2007. It starts at 12:00 on the 24th and ends the following day the 25th September at 14:00. For details of the event download the
correspondents’ day invitation and detailed outline of the event. You can register until the 10th of August 2007 by sending an email to felix.brandes@tno.nl

Highlights of event
· Key note speaker, Dr Karlheinz Steinmüller on corporate foresight (Z-Punkt consulting)
· Featured correspondents’: Presentations by Per Dannemand (Risoe, Denmark) on cross national foresights based on the example of the Nordic Hydrogen Energy 2030 exercise & Jon Parke on recent experiences of foresight output in policy making processes in the UK (DIUS, UK)
· Results of EFMN Mapping exercise 2007 partly reporting on comparing issues and innovations in FP7 to recent foresight exercises (Michael Keenan, PREST, UK)
· Results of EFMN Issue analysis 2007 on emerging issues in the knowledge economy and society (Sylvie Rijkers-Defrasne, VDI, Germany)
· Presentation by a representative of DG Research on the future of foresight in Europe
· Opinion poll on most interesting, most pressing future issue feeding into next year’s EFMN issue analysis
· Informal dinner in the evening of the 24th September and networking opportunities with other future / foresight professionals

Tuesday, July 03, 2007

Taste of Diversity impressions











Monday, June 04, 2007

Universal Declaration of Human Values

As Proposed by His Holiness Sri Sri Ravi Shankar

This document, developed by His Holiness Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, represents his vision for a fresh approach to fostering understanding and harmonious coexistence among different peoples and cultures, and fulfilling the purposes for which the United Nations was formed. It is in the form of a proposed resolution of the General Assembly of the United Nations. It is hoped that, in due course, member States will formally bring this document forward to the United Nations, in accordance with normal General Assembly processes and channels, for discussion, adoption, and subsequent implementation.
It is Sri Sri’s intention that this proposed Declaration serve as a tool to begin a global discussion of the crucial issues it raises.


The United Nations General Assembly,

Recognizing the paramount importance of harmonious coexistence among different peoples;

Acknowledging the urgent need to bring about understanding among different cultures and civilizations and to foster harmony in diversity throughout the world;

Deeply concerned by increasing conflict and violence around the globe;

Determined to address the root causes of this increasing conflict and violence;

Recognizing that much of the conflict and violence today is attributable to religious and ethnic divisions and misunderstanding;

Recalling that the United Nations was formed to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war and to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights and the dignity and worth of the human person, as set out in the Preamble of the United Nations Charter;

Reaffirming our commitment to the purposes of the United Nations that include maintaining international peace and security, developing friendly relations among nations, and achieving international cooperation in encouraging respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, as set out in Article 1 of the United Nations Charter;

Emphasizing our commitment to the principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which constitutes a common standard of achievement for all peoples and nations, as well as our commitment to the subsequent existing international human rights instruments;

Recognizing that grave human rights violations continue around the world, despite more than half a century of efforts to achieve human rights and fundamental freedoms for all;

Reaffirming our commitment to the United Nations Millennium Declaration, adopted on September 8, 2000;

Recalling that the United Nations Millennium Declaration sets out a number of basic societal values considered essential to international relations in the 21st century, as well as specific objectives to be achieved consistent with these values in key areas which include peace, security and disarmament; development and poverty eradication; protecting our common environment; human rights and good governance; protecting the vulnerable; and meeting the special needs of Africa;

Determined to achieve the goals and objectives of the Millennium Declaration, including universal human rights, despite serious challenges that the world now faces in doing so;

Recognizing that we must broaden our vision and readjust our strategies in order to foster mutual respect and understanding among different cultures and civilizations, enabling the achievement of the commitments made in the past;

Acknowledging the urgent need to address the spiritual aspect of human existence in order to achieve harmonious coexistence among diverse peoples, realize universal human rights, and fulfill the purposes for which the United Nations was formed;

Appealing to that same universal Divine consciousness and power that is at the core of all the world’s religions for assistance and support in this crucial endeavor,



Solemnly proclaims this Universal Declaration of Human Values.



For the full text please visit:
http://www.srisriravishankar.info/universalhumanvalues.html



Friday, April 20, 2007

Aspects of Mobility

By Arnab B. Chowdhury


Arnab B. Chowdhury is founder and CEO of Ninad (
www.ninad.biz) – an international e-Learning consulting firm, headquartered at Pondichéry, south India.


What is the most perceptible differentiator between plants and us? What enabled Babur to cross the Hindukush mountains to establish the Moghul dynasty in India, Columbus to discover the New World in an ad-hoc fashion or Neil Armstrong to take that small first step on the moon? Is there a common phenomenon that underlies these questions?

The answer perhaps lies in that basic instinct called - mobility.Over the past two hundred odd years, the fundamental pattern of human mobility has changed. Physical mobility has begun to be superseded by logical mobility that relates more towards our emotional and intellectual needs rather than solely our physical wants. For millennia, we have been physically mobile whether in the form of individual, family, tribe or army moving in search of better sustenance - better arable land, water, wealth, power or simply aspiring for better quality of life.

Logical mobility was founded more recently in 1830 when Joseph Henry demonstrated the potential of using electromagnetic phenomenon of electricity for long distance communication by sending an electronic current over one mile of wire to activate an electromagnet which caused a bell to ring. Later in 1844, Samuel F. B. Morse used this property of electricity to invent the telegraph and transmitted his famous message "What hath God wrought?" from Washington to Baltimore – a distance of 40 miles. Then followed, the epoch making first voice call over wire -- "Mr. Watson, come here, I want you!” by Alexander Graham Bell in 1876. Logical mobility evolved from ringing a bell to telegraph to telephone, which in turn led to the television.

Later, in 1957 in retaliation to the launching of Sputnik – the first artificial satellite by the USSR, the United States formed the Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) within the Department of Defence. The mandate for Paul Baran of RAND corporation was to maintain its command and control over its missiles and bombers with a decentralized communication network in case of a Soviet nuclear attack. His final proposal was a packet switched network wherein packets of data (datagrams) were labelled to indicate the origin and destination of the information to be sent to the destination computer in the network. Multiple flavours of packet-switched networks including TCP/IP and X.25 emerged. TCP/IP, driven by education and defence in the United States, grew as a data network for computer users community - while the European industry nurtured X.25 that grew as the network offered by the telecom operators.

Add to it the development of the World Wide Web (WWW) started by Tim Berners-Lee as a text processing software in European Particle Physics Laboratory in Switzerland back in 1989. This phenomenon converged communication technology with information technology, which ushered in the digital economy. With the World Wide Web, three societal needs were given the appropriate media platform to nurture: communication, commerce and entertainment. In all, this convergent development met the basic aspiration of logical mobility – the need and ability to access data, information and knowledge from anywhere, anytime.

But is logical mobility really making a difference to the quality of human life from a socio-economic perspective? The answer is 'yes' among the digital divide 'haves'. We, as distant learning student, sales professional, retail investor, digital entertainment consumer or anybody labelled as mobile worker, are already leveraging upon near-instant wireless and wireline information on the fly with networked devices such as cell phones, PDAs (Personal Digital Assistant) and a host of smart mobile devices like the iPod.

But what about the 'have-nots'? What about that eighty percent of the global population that lives on less than one dollar a day, most of whom -- according to the World Resources Institute -- have never made a telephone call, let alone used the Internet? The answer is an almost inaudible 'yes' with a booming 'no'.

We still have to imagine how the benefits of mobile computing can percolate down to the larger bottom-tier of humankind when much larger issues such as health, literacy, and economic sustenance-related issues are looming ahead. A total sceptic might snigger – hey if we cannot supply decent electricity can we have PCs or cell phones that don't use electricity instead? Or look at the Dot Com boom and bust wherein we simply ignorantly labelled the 'have-nots' as 'have-laters'?

However, the optimist in us says that all is not lost. We aren't talking about the Wi-Fi hotspots and satellite telephones in the digital 'haves' world but about a couple of pioneering instances closer home in the Indian subcontinent where the digital economy landscape is as diverse from the hi-tech hub of Bangalore to Balasore district and where logical mobility has changed the lives from 'have-nots' to 'haves-now'.

One shining example is the Village Phone Program by GrameenPhone in cooperation with Grameen Bank – Bangladesh's internationally renowned micro-credit lending institution. This Program is a unique effort that provides telecommunications facilities in rural areas while providing the Village Phone operators, mostly poor rural women, a good earning opportunity with the commitment of "good development is good business". As an owner-operated pay phone, the Village Phone Program provides telephone services in rural areas where no such facilities existed before. It allows the rural poor, who cannot afford to become a regular subscriber, to avail the service. Typically, a borrower of Grameen Bank takes a loan of around 12,000 Taka and buys a handset and subscription of the mobile service while she is also trained on to how to operate it and how to charge the users for it. As of October 2003, there were more than 39,000 Village Phones in operation operating in nearly 28,000 villages of some 58 districts encompassing more than 50 million people living in remote rural areas!

Technologically, High Gain Antenna ensures smooth call completion in areas of weak signal while extending coverage for the Village Phone operation without further investment in network expansion. To counter remote villages without electricity, solar panel and DC batteries are being used for charging the cell phones. As a business, the average revenue per user (ARPU) of Village Phone subscribers is double that of the average business user. So imagine the difference in quality of life this Program can create in terms of being an essential communication channel during relief operations in the context of natural disasters, and in future when GrameenPhone integrates content services such as distance education, health assistance and adult education via fax, e-mail and Internet.

Another potential case is a project called 'Open Source Simple Computer for Agriculture in Rural Areas' or OSCAR that has the objective of developing a decision-making tool for weed identification and control that will address the issue of the declining agricultural productivity in South Asia. And that decision-making tool is essentially logically moulding agronomy know-how software onto a 'Simputer' - a hand-held 32MB Linux-based computer using smartcard technology that runs on three AAA batteries with a price tag of about Rs.10,000. Imagine Baldev Singh, a wheat farmer, instead of relying on his Doordarshan-fed Krishidarshan capsule, checking out his crop to evaluate his quality of wheat output with an easy-to-interface species identification software program in Hindi! A joint effort by French Institute of Pondicherry, Rice Wheat Consortium for the Indo-Gangetic Plains (Delhi), University of Wageningen (the Netherlands), and Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD–France), OSCAR has the potential to make a difference to the quality of agro-output, mindset and finally the quality of life for the millions of farmers and in turn millions of consumers in the Indo-Gangetic Plains and beyond.

With the digital economy, a new mobility paradigm has evolved from a physical mobility of goods (atoms and molecules) to logical objects (bits). Actual information and business workflows have changed in terms of operations leveraging upon the four essential characteristics of the digital economy – digitisation, immediacy, globalisation and virtualisation.

Economic divide in the society-at-large between the rich and the poor has always been an age-old issue that thinkers, philosophers and politicians have been trying to bridge with severe lack of success. In the digital context, the economic divide continues to lie in the ability to find, create, develop and utilize the right information at the right time in a cost-effective manner. Is logical mobility as a phenomenon going to help us to bridge that divide or is it going to be a grand global case of technological apartheid?

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Lifestyle and New Media

Laurence Desarzens, urban communicator, beatmap.com
Media & communication specialist for lifestyle companies




Laurence is a Thought Leader in the
LAB on MEDIA and Human Experience
An immersed experience of a Do-Tank
May 29 & 30, 2007
Location: Girona near Barcelona, Spain
http://www.clubofamsterdam.com/event.asp?contentid=657

Club of Amsterdam: Laurence - you are in close touch with youth culture - this from a cultural as well as commercial involvement. Lifestyle is more and more the defining factor for new media. Can you give us some examples how young "urban tribes" are dealing with communication and media at large?

First I think we should talk once about the definition of what is “youth” today. Maybe “youth” is less related to an age group and more to a lifestyle. Keeping this in mind … Using new media (which essentially are tools) need time, that’s certainly why it influence your lifestyle. And for sure if you are using these tools you keep in contact to your network and group. That’s what allows you to learn, share and exchange, work, be cool ;). You use mobile, internet, constantly and everywhere, you communicate constantly. So everything influences everything to give birth to colourful, and creative trends in all fields, who constantly evolve. These trends can also be scary and dark off course. It’s the people and not the media who are defining the content. Or is it really ;)

Youth tribes fluidly use all means of new technologies to surf what can be of their very specific interests NOW. They double-check validity, relevance and credibility with their friends faster than the speed of light. They copy, they fake, because the tools are theirs to do so, and why not. They use what is the most convenient for them to communicate … internet, gsm, whatever.

You will see website about specific cultures interests: skate, sneaker culture, music, who can bloom in a very short time. You see trends come, go and come back, and mutate. If you take people in hip hop music, you have young producers doing beats, exchanging and working cross borders. Influenced by anything. So they use all these tools whatever they are … AIM, Skype you name it.

In hip hop and really in all subcultures it’s simply amazing to see all these mosaic of ideas, tastes and styles developing and exchanging via new media. If main media are not interested they create their own. Look at record label like Stones Throw for example … or Ninja Tune … They build shops, platform, and post. There are many examples besides my space and you tube. Sneakerplay.com is a sneaker community for example, or the fashion blogs who are now giving “the ton” somewhere to print media such as Vogue, it’s “le monde a l’envers”.


Club of Amsterdam: Improved bandwidth allows to distribute content through Internet and wireless close to dvd quality. This means a radical change of the media landscape. Can you give us examples of "everybody can be a tv station" etc?

What defines a TV station? If it’s about making programs at regular time, with specific subjects, selected and where the information is provided via a journalistic approach, I think it then to have more bandwidth doesn’t necessarily facilitate. But if it’s posting moving images about specific subjects then certainly with bandwidth availability we see an explosion of the worst and the best DIY TV online. Like TV on demand.

In wide interests website like www.youporn.com show what is happening when bandwidth and tools are available to everyone … I let you guess, sex definitely is the huge potential for online TV … on the other hand of the ethical spectrum you have a site like www.godtube.com which is for the Christians community.

For entertainment www.heavy.com was there pretty early on, and can be seen as TV on demand with lot of ads, special shows, like TV on demand again. Many subcultures used the bandwidth available to document their products, lifestyles or visions, from skateboard to graffiti, and off course hip hop . That’s what’s interesting regarding my own interests. But is it TV or not?


Club of Amsterdam: What do you expect from a dialogue about media and human experience?

Enhance my knowledge and my network on all levels. Seen the volume of information we need to exchange to proof the intel we get. You are nothing without the others. So I would like to define collaborative visions based on respect and openness or how to optimize these processes, we need to go over the clichés, the fear, we need to admit we can’t have it all, and we don’t need to have it all. I just need to be able to plug in. So it’s about keeping the network open. And respect again.


Thank you Laurence!

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

The Future of the Web

Q&A with Ricardo Baeza-Yates, Director and Roelof Van Zwol, Senior Researcher, Yahoo! Research Barcelona




Ricardo is a Thought Leader in the
LAB on MEDIA and Human Experience
An immersed experience of a Do-Tank
May 29 & 30, 2007
Location: Girona near Barcelona, Spain
http://www.clubofamsterdam.com/event.asp?contentid=657


Club of Amsterdam: Ricardo and Roelof - the Internet is constantly changing and offering new possibilities like Web 2.0. Social networks will benefit from these new features. Can you give us an idea how human interaction will improve?

Social networks will allows for direct communication with users with similar backgrounds, or interests, or with experts in a certain area.For example, inside Yahoo! we use a social network tool that is the perfect example, where given a few keywords, the experts in any topic like "social media" can instantly be found. It uses not only the self-descriptive tags provided by a user, but also the tags that other people used to tag fellow colleagues. We are using it on a regular basis, and it is especially useful for checking one's background, or for finding the person with the right expertise within the Yahoo! company, within seconds. Thus at a professional level it already improves the efficiency. When it comes to social networks on the Web, it also allows for the formation of large online communities that share common interests, and allow a user to share, and acquire knowledge. One recent development in the area of social networks, called second life, allows users and companies to start a new and perhaps more exciting life on the Internet.


Club of Amsterdam: Knowledge is essential for further development and innovation. Collaborative media will give us a world of new opportunities. Can you describe a future scenario?

The second life example already gives you a hint of where the "Future of the Web" will go. Last year, Yahoo! Research has organized a workshop under this title in Barcelona focused in Web Search, when the lab was opened. One future scenario will be that you are commuting to work, and would like to know which route to take, in order to avoid traffic jams, or that it might be better to work form home, due to expected traffic in the evening. You ask this question, and instantaneously receive audiovisual information from either validated sources, like traffic cameras, or from other commuters that have found themselves stuck in a traffic jam.


Club of Amsterdam: What are new developments in social media?

We already see that the dialog between users and media allows for new forms of interaction between users and their computers. Flickr, the Yahoo! photo sharing site, allows users to upload, and tag their photos online for sharing with their friends or to directly show them to a large community. When another user is exploring the Flickr photo database, he or she can provide additional tags, a photo rating, or give comments on the image. This allows for the retrieval of high quality and interesting photos at a scale that was not envisioned possible before. Currently, the Flickr site contains hundreds of millions of photos that are hand tagged by users, while the current state of the art in content-based image retrieval (CBIR) is not yet ready to handle this scale. This does not mean that existing research in this area has become obsolete. On the contrary, the combination ofCBIR with social media should allow for even better sharing and retrieval services in the future.

New forms of media are appearing on a daily basis, and it is next to impossible to track all the new developments in this area. It is however sure that the online presence of users will increase and that the role of media in this perspective is significant. It will allow for direct interactive communication through rich media channels in a fast changing world.



Thank you Ricardo and Roelof!

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Rudy de Waele about "We Media"

Rudy de Waele, Founder, M-trends.org





Rudy is a Thought Leader in the
LAB on MEDIA and Human Experience
An immersed experience of a Do-Tank
May 29 & 30, 2007
Location: Girona near Barcelona, Spain
http://www.clubofamsterdam.com/event.asp?contentid=657




Club of Amsterdam: Rudy, you are a leading consultant to the wireless industry. This industry is developing very fast. In most cases I get the impression that products once reaching the customers are already outdated. How does the mobile industry relate their product development to "quality of life"?

This is indeed an industry where products have an average 'lifecycle' of approximately 2 years. Device manufacturers are designing products to different target customers, with the flashy, shiny, trendy products as to be used by the opinion leaders, early birds/first movers and trendsetters first, and while learning from their experience, the manufactures designs new and improved products that will fit the mass market demand in 1 or 2 years.

"Quality of life" is very important in mobile and wireless since every new generation of phones adds something new to satisfy the demands of the consumer and meet the expectations set by the marketing of the products. Don't forget that the mobile phone is the most sold 'aspirational gadget' of all times.

For example the new data services, all multimedia (camera, images, video, mp3player, webbrowser, etc.) integrated now in nearly any standard phone, was just unimaginable only a couple of years ago. Note that a typical high-end smartphone can match the performance of a mid-range laptop computer only five years ago! Nokia don't call them phones any longer but multimedia computers... But these new gadgets might bring also new addictions, away from TV or PC to smaller screens such as mobile devices.


Club of Amsterdam: New technologies are getting more hybrid. Virtual worlds merge with the "real" world and in this context the user experience is also changing. How does the future consumer create his "personal" media experience?

The youth of today wants to stay connected all the time with their network of friends, news, entertainment and events around through the PC or the mobile... the universal sense of belonging has translated itself in the need to 'stay connected' or 'always on'.

In 5 years time, my 'wearable media' (MyMedia) device will be able to do a lot more things then what is currently possible, it will have the capacity to store entire movies in good quality, my whole music catalogue, photo album, design- and project works just on my mobile device, to take that with me wherever I'll be, to connect it to other devices and (bigger) screens and enjoy that media together with friends. There will be a lot more possibilities for the user to be 'always on' connected to the internet, the news, entertainment and stay connected to my social networks connected with my friends and exchange more content. So, pretty soon, anyone will have the tools and the possibility to create his own media channel, through audio or video. An explosion of user-media is yet still to come.

The virtual will more easily connect with the physical world through taggable objects, once tagged with a phone through image recognition, qr-codes or 2D codes, will bring you directly to some added-value or complementary content or information on the subject tagged.


Club of Amsterdam: What do you expect from a dialogue about media and human experience?

Raise a set of questions that are essential to create a good human experience in relation to the rapid technology developments of today. To think and discuss about those questions and to put forward some essential issues towards the industry. What is the influence of all this media to our children, society in general? What can be done to improve this? How can we improve our learning systems using media annd technology to make sure our children can rapidly change/adapt to deal with the future changes? Who will control global digital access in the future? What about universal access? Multilingualism? Mobile learning systems? Media conglomerations? Is this really we media or their media? How to organize the overflow of information coming to us? Wikipedia example? Who owns what kind of information and who can manipulate what?

Thank you Rudy!

Monday, March 05, 2007

Q&A with Simon Taylor about Climate and Energy Provision

Simon Taylor is Director and Co-Founder of Global Witness






Simon is a Thought Leader in the
LAB on Old and New ENERGY
An immersed experience of a Do-Tank
April 17 & 18, 2007
Location: Girona near Barcelona, Spain
Max. 20 Delegates
Early Bird registration till March 9th!
http://www.clubofamsterdam.com/event.asp?contentid=655

Club of Amsterdam: Simon, you are a Director and Co-Founder of Global Witness, an organisation that exposes the corrupt exploitation of natural resources - amongst them oil and gas. What are your long-term strategies and how do plan to implement them?

In 1993 together with two others, Charmian Gooch and Patrick Alley, I set up Global Witness to expose the corrupt exploitation of natural resources and international trade systems, to drive campaigns that end impunity, resource-linked conflict, and human rights and environmental abuses.

Half of Global Witness’ work involves the compilation of first hand evidence and information about the situation on the ground in areas of conflict and instability through conducting investigations, field visits, and standard research. Such information is then compiled into hard-hitting reports which are subsequently taken to all key policy makers to ensure change. Half of our work is accurate information gathering – the other half strategically using such information to drive positive change.

Right now, the existing modalities for natural resource extraction do not work. Details of such arrangements are usually shrouded in secrecy, and the provision of concessions almost always, certainly in the developing world, involves major corruption. Usually also in our experience, it is very hard to see the benefits being accrued to the country and its population – rather, the population is usually on the receiving end of a litany of abuse, a degradation of quality of life, and very often conflict. Such conditions tend to prevail for the masses, whilst a small elite benefit on a vast scale through the wholesale asset-stripping of state assets and the passing of the proceeds through the international banking system, with no questions asked.

So, in summary, the existing international architecture which governs the roles of companies taking advantage of such conditions requires a major overhaul. Right now, shareholders, influential mafia-style middlemen, international banks, and elites within natural resource-exporting countries benefit on a massive scale, at the direct expense of their populations. You could even say that the populations of these countries subsidise these “profits” with their livelihoods, and very often with their lives.

Global Witness has been exposing key examples of such business practices and the systems by which business activities operate for over a decade. We have been the key initiator of a number of international processes, including the Kimberley Process to combat conflict or blood diamonds, the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI), which came about as a UK Government response to the launching of the Publish What You Pay Campaign (PWYP), and the FLEG initiatives to address illegal logging. These processes are far from complete. In addition, we urgently require additional changes to this international trade and business architecture, otherwise companies and individuals will continue conduct business in areas of conflict and instability, without any accountability over the impact of their actions on local populations.

Global Witness will continue to expose examples of bad business in any and all sectors which influence instability and conflict and which destroy serious efforts at development in such countries. Coming out of this work will be further deliverable strategies to address these issues.


Club of Amsterdam: "Publish What You Pay" - conceived and co-launched by Global Witness - is a campaign that aims to help citizens of resource-rich developing countries hold their governments accountable for the management of revenues from the oil, gas and mining industries. Can you describe its impact?

Publish What You Pay (PWYP) was launched to demand mandatory revenue disclosure from companies in the oil and gas, and mining sectors. Other sectors may be included later. This was because many such companies had been, and continue to be, involved in sleazy deals with producer country elites. These company activities have included the running of slush funds in tax havens for the purpose of bribery or delivery of “favours”, outright bribery, the payments of vast sums into personal accounts and even the payment for and delivery of weapons into conflict zones via company subsidiaries that do not officially exist. We have even come across a system where a major prominent international oil company deliberately rigged the debt of a producer country, such that it completely controlled the entire economy of the country – of course, to its favour. Of course, the other half of this coin is the role of elites in resource exporting countries who, as described above benefit from such activities.

Before launching PWYP in 2002, Global Witness had already been involved in a 2 ½ year discussion with some of the more enlightened oil and gas companies to create the conditions for these companies to disclosure their payment data on a voluntary basis. In early 2001, BP announced that it intended to disclose such data in Angola – only to be faced with contract termination and being thrown out of the country. The circumstances around this incident ultimately demonstrated the limits to which oil companies, even if they wanted to, could go. Ultimately, going it alone would be disastrous for any company – not only this, but those companies which were fundamentally part of the problem had no intention of following such an example, and would be left to pick up contracts at the expense of the “good” companies. Such a voluntary process was thus completely inoperable!

The launch of PWYP quite rapidly created a reaction from the UK Government, which launched the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI), which brings together producer and consumer governments, a large percentage of the global key oil, gas and mining companies (there is a need to attract more of them), and civil society. The initiative is based on the premise that countries would volunteer to disclose the revenue streams they obtain from the extraction and export of oil and gas and mining products. Once a country steps up to the mark, all companies would be then be obliged to disclose the payments they make for the extraction of the resources in their concessions. This way, comparison can be made between what companies say they pay, and what countries say they receive. Any discrepancy could then be independently assessed, with civil society being intimately involved in the process. The result would be a level of disclosure of the vast rents which accrue as a consequence of natural resource extraction (in particular, oil and gas) which hitherto has not been available. This would create an absolute minimum, but vitally important, first step towards creating accountable governance over such revenues in order that they might actually benefit the citizens of the countries concerned.

There are various areas of concern with these arrangements thus far. The most important of these is that it remains very hard to imagine the likes of President dos Santos of Angola, or President Obiang of Equatorial Guinea (there are many others who could be added to this list) actually volunteering their countries to implement EITI. The elites who call the shots in both these countries are amongst the pre-eminent kleptocrats in the world today, and they have no interest in being held accountable for the expenditure of their State’s revenues, which are currently making them very rich. Having said that, there is some delivery coming from EITI due to the significant implementation of EITI by Nigeria and Azerbaijan – both places where it would have been hard to believe this was possible only a short while ago. These are significant steps forward, but it is important to understand that this is a work in progress and we need to see where the initiative goes over the next year to year and half, whilst also continuing with efforts to deliver mandatory disclosure mechanisms in a variety of jurisdictions.

PWYP is now a coalition of 300+ civil society organizations across all continents of the world. It is an extremely effective and efficient coalition and is represented on the International Advisory board of EITI, such that civil society plays a key role in the evolution and delivery of EITI. The PWYP coalition is intimately involved in a global push to deliver parallel mandatory solutions to revenue transparency, premised on the idea that we need to see accountability over the management of resource revenues by both the elites who control the expenditure, and the companies who do the paying. The consequence of this global engagement is that the idea of revenue transparency in all countries for natural resource extraction has moved from an issue where we were initially laughed at by company and government officials as being unrealistic, to a situation today where it is in the mainstream, and where the key largest oil, gas and mining companies, together with an array of producer and consumer countries have agreed to the delivery of revenue transparency. We now need to keep up the pressure and see where this process goes.


Club of Amsterdam: The way we use energy and we treat the environment are closely connected. What do you expect from a dialogue between "old and new energy" and more specifically: What role should nuclear energy play?

We are rapidly heading to a global crunch-time regarding the provision and utilisation of energy. This “crunch” primarily relates to two major global crises, which if not addressed are likely to precipitate a vast array of additional crises, seriously threatening any future prosperity, let alone the prospect of significant development across the world’s least developed countries. I am referring here to the nexus of the climate and energy provision crises – each in their own right seemingly vast imponderable problems, but which when taken together create a problem the scale of which humanity has not yet experienced.

We are familiar with many of the serious implications of impending climate change, and so I will not go into any detail here. However, thus far the political response to this situation is massively inadequate to the task. We see political posturing, and at best now at least the clarion call for action on the basis that this is a serious matter for humanity to address. But then, almost in the same breath, the “solutions” put forward are so inadequate that one might be tempted to laugh, if the implications were not so serious.

Simultaneously, and neatly compartmentalised into another section of governments’ thinking, we also hear the call for energy security. Whilst it is of course obvious from any state’s perspective, to secure stable supplies of essential energy, it is clear that for the main part such calls relate to securing ever more supplies of oil and gas – the very things we should be avoiding if we wish to slow down and ultimately prevent dangerous climate change. The consequence of this shallow thinking is that the entire global energy provision system of financial, diplomatic and corporate operations remains geared to business as usual.

As if this was not bad enough from a climate change point of view, we are rapidly heading towards (if we have not got there already!) a peak in global conventional oil production. Gas is not too far behind. The consequence of global conventional oil peaking is not that we run out of oil – oil will still be available for a long time to come. What it does mean once this peak in output is reached is that global oil production will no longer be able to match demand. Furthermore, the lines on any graph of production versus demand are likely to separate very quickly. All this leads ultimately, and within very few years, into very dangerous territory: At best it will completely undermine the global governance agenda, leading to the end of such initiatives as EITI, with companies and governments rushing to the bottom to outbid one another in a downward spiral of dirty deals. At worst, within very few years after a peak of oil output, we face the prospect of global powers – nuclear armed powers - facing off against each other in an increasingly aggressive posture for essential energy resources.

Following on from the climate crisis disaster, political thinking around the provision of energy represents a second massive abrogation of responsibility by our political leadership. Given the pre-eminent role oil plays right across the global economy, it is not just the prospect of military confrontation we should be worried about. Indeed the economic implications could be a disaster on the scale of 1929 all over again.

There are of course no easy solutions to this situation. However, what is clearly required is the kind of global leadership and international cooperation on the scale we have seldom seen in the past. The output needs to be nothing short of a global revolution around the way in which we generate and utilize energy and its subsequent equitable availability. Nothing less will suffice. Whilst this might sound dismissive, nuclear power would seem to be an unnecessary distraction which does nothing to address either our overall energy requirements, or the overall use of carbon intensive energy sources – and that is before we consider the implications of the complete lack of adequate waste management, the propensity for increased nuclear use to create its own security of supply problem, the appalling overall record of the industry when it comes to onsite safety and maintenance, and the increased risks of nuclear proliferation and the potential for terrorism.

In terms of the dialogue, I would hope we can discuss some of these issues further during the LAB on Old and New ENERGY.


Thank you Simon!


Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Q&A with Nathalie Horbach about the future of Nuclear Energy

Nathalie Horbach, Centre for Energy, Petroleum and Mineral Law and Policy, University of Dundee





Nathalie is a Thought Leader in the
LAB on Old and New ENERGY
An immersed experience of a Do-Tank
April 17 & 18, 2007
Location: Girona near Barcelona, Spain
Max. 20 Delegates
Early Bird registration till March 9th!
http://www.clubofamsterdam.com/event.asp?contentid=655

Club of Amsterdam: Nathalie - you teach at the Centre for Energy, Petroleum and Mineral Law and Policy at the University of Dundee and you follow the policies of nuclear energy at national and international level. There seems to be on one side a growing pro nuclear energy mood in Europe and on the other side a country like Germany follows a clear exit strategy. How is Europe going to deal with this situation?

Europe leaves its member-states the option to choose which course they prefer to follow. However, it now explicitly recognizes the "necessity" of including nuclear energy in the energy mix, for reasons of security of supply and diversification of energy sources, and emission constraints. Due to liberalisation, increased competition and European integration of national energy markets, it seems that such an accommodating approach is both justified and effective. It leaves those member-states, such as France or Finland, with a vested interest and political support to ensure the necessary nuclear share within Europe, while others, such as Germany, may pursue other options in respect of renewables (wind) thereby adequately responding to public pressure. In this way, joint investments in and further development of nuclear energy will be channeled to dynamic and secure markets, which allow also for channeling of safeguards, security and safety activities in order to further improve and ensure safe, reliable and sensible use of nuclear energy in the future. However, due to potential risks involved in nuclear activities, it is important to improve transparency and fair competition (especially in safety and technology) worldwide instead of merely regional, while preventing protectionist approaches.

Club of Amsterdam: Can you explain how nuclear energy relates to environmental issues? What role is it going to play in context of sustainable energy sources like wind energy etc.?

Nuclear energy provides for a credible alternative source of electricity. It does not emit CO2 although, similar to renewable energy sources, emissions are not entirely zero. Due to the need to mitigate recognized risks, nuclear energy has the most secured and innovative energy fuel cycle, in respect of both strict international and national safety and liability regulation (polluter-pays), including internalization of such costs in the electricity price.

It is for that reason that it can be considered to be increasingly 'sustainable'. However, there remains the issue of waste, which includes also an intergenerational aspect, that could be both negative (imposing a potential 'radioactive' inheritance) and positive (potentiality of an essential future energy source in view of new technological reprocessing developments), even though not imposing society with unconfined and uncontrollable emissions. In addition, proliferation and terrorism risks continues to be a source of concern, resulting in political reservations with respect to nuclear energy. Nonetheless, nuclear energy seems in the mid- to long term to be a 'sensible choice' in view of all available options. It is a credible and necessary alternative, especially in combination with renewable sources of energy, to reduce carbon fuel dependency both to respond to climate change and environmental concerns as well as insecurities inherent (and recently increasing) in the global energy supply market.

As such, the policy to no longer exclude nuclear energy as an option and even to increase reliance on nuclear power, could play an important mid-term role. On the one hand, it attracts further investment into developing safer and environmental neutral forms of generating nuclear electricity. Such is currently the focus of joint efforts in respect of nuclear fusion and 'new generation' nuclear facilities, which are constructed to be inherently safe, highly economical, proliferation resistant and produce minimal waste. On the other hand, it ensures an adequate electricity supply in the middle long-term, while reducing usage of carbon fuel as part of a global policy, and thus allows in the meantime increasing efforts and investments in further maturing other energy sources (wind, solar, etc.) in order to shift to a potential better sustainable option in the long-term.

Club of Amsterdam: What do you expect from a dialogue between "old and new energy"?

It is important to accumulate all fresh, innovative and diverging views, ideas and experience into a solid and new energy dialogue in order to extract important elements for a comprehensive and reality driven energy policy for the future. Often discussions in this field are constructed around narrow and obsolete premises, leaving aside a great potential that might result from a wider and more comprehensive approach based on an innovative method of guiding and channeling thoughts within a more 'philosophical' environment. This dialogue could encourage such a focus in search of consensus on new parameters, essential requirements and contemporary guiding principles appropriate to be incorporated in the preparation of future (European and other international) energy policies or strategies.


Thank you Nathalie!

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Q&A with Paul Holister about Nanotechnology & Energy

Paul Holister is a consultant specialising in, among other things, the commercial and societal impacts of new technologies. He is currently writing "Nanotechnology and the Future of Energy", to be published by John Wiley and Sons.




Paul is a Thought Leader in the
LAB on Old and New ENERGY
An immersed experience of a Do-Tank
April 17 & 18, 2007
Location: Girona near Barcelona, Spain
Max. 20 Delegates
Early Bird registration till March 9th!
http://www.clubofamsterdam.com/event.asp?contentid=655

Club of Amsterdam: Paul, you are currently writing a book about "Nanotechnology and the Future of Energy". Can you describe how nanotechnology can have an impact on energy generation, storage, and utilization?

Nanotechnology operates at such a fundamental level that there is very little of a technological nature that it will not impact. Thus its effects on energy generation, transmission, storage and consumption are numerous and diverse. Some will be incremental and some quite possibly revolutionary.

Rather than trying to sketch the whole landscape, a few examples will hopefully illustrate the variety.
At the mundane end of the scale you have anti-fouling paints for wave or tidal power, or materials with a higher tolerance for radiation in nuclear reactors. I did say mundane.

In wind power, the potentially enormous improvements in strength-to-weight ratio of composite materials used in blades could pay back surprisingly well because the relationship of blade length to efficiency is not linear but follows a power law - though there is much argument about how this pans out in the real world.

At the other extreme of nanotech impact, you have solar energy. We are children in this area, and the playground is built on the nanoscale. Almost any development is going to involve nanotech - an intriguing recent exception being the use of lenses to focus light on old-fashioned silicon photovoltaics, thus demanding less of this expensive material. This is one of the areas where nanotech-enabled technology could well be revolutionary.

But what makes for a revolution in energy generation? Two things: availability and economics. The fact that solar energy is so bountiful - enough hits the Earth in a minute to meet our global requirements for at least a week - makes it potentially revolutionary; it's just the cost of capturing that energy that has been standing in the way. Reduce that enough, or increase the cost of the alternatives, and you have a revolution.

One other energy source could, I believe, be equally revolutionary. Not fusion, which, despite the dreams of my youth, I sadly have to relegate to a distant future - not that the ongoing experiments aren't worthwhile. Geothermal energy, boring as hot rocks and steam may sound - outside of saunas, that is -, has revolutionary potential for the same reason as solar - an essentially unlimited supply of energy untapped only because of economics. The nanotech connection is not as direct here as with solar - you have tougher materials to cut drilling costs or thermoelectric tunneling for efficient low-grade heat conversion - but it only takes the right conjunction of developments and geothermal power stations will be springing up - or down - all over the place.

I've only considered here principal power generation, but this should already give some sense of the breadth and potential scale of impact. I'd be surprised to find any reader of this unaware of the excitement surrounding developments in fuel cell and battery technology. Nanotechnology figures almost without exception in the cutting edge of both.

But I could go on for ages answering this question - you could almost make a book out of it ...


How do nanotechnology-based solutions apply particularly, if at all, to environmental concerns and energy security issues?

From an energy security point of view, nanotech developments are invariably positive since, at the very least, they can help save energy - aerogels for better insulation, IR-reflective window coatings, low-grade heat conversion in cars, etc.. They also assist to varying degrees in the development of alternatives to the fossil fuels upon which so many of us are now so dangerously dependant. I've already mentioned the potential of solar and geothermal energy.

On the environmental front the answer is not so clear. We live in a world where short-term economics have an overwhelming influence on decision making.

The good news for those who worry about things like global warming, is that the increasing cost of oil - a long-term trend that will not stop, oil being a finite resource - and the decreasing cost of alternatives such as solar energy, give renewables an ever more favourable economic position. When you look at the diverse spread of nanotech-related impacts they are almost always supporting technologies with an improved environmental profile.

Unfortunately, there is a rather big exception to this. Nanotechnology has helped greatly improve the effectiveness of catalysts. Fuel cells and catalytic converters are among the welcome beneficiaries.

But catalysis is also at the heart of gas-to-liquid and coal liquefaction technologies that promise oil independence for those with access to previously uneconomical gas reserves or to coal reserves. Energy security is a big carrot and it so happens that two highly-populated countries that rank among the fastest-growing economies in the world, and thus the fastest-growing energy consumers, are coal-rich: China and India. North America too is coal-rich.

If such countries can start to economically run their cars, trucks and buses on diesel made from coal - which ironically is low-emission compared with normal diesel at the vehicle end but overall produces more CO2 than oil-based diesel - then we could be looking at a greenhouse gas nightmare scenario - there is enough coal in the world to supply our energy needs for hundreds of years.

So, greenhouse nightmare or an emission-free future? Nanotechnology can enable them both. Barring a global wave of forward planning unseen in mankind's history, economics will probably make the decision for us.


What do you expect from a dialogue between "old and new energy"?

Taking 'old energy' to be the way we have done things since the dawn of the industrial revolution, i.e. primarily by burning fossil fuels, I think that the likeliest difference between old and new energy, and the generator of greatest debate, will be systemic rather than one particular technology or another. The question of when and how the transition to new energy occurs is also intriguing - as the coal liquefaction scenario above shows, we could in theory be stuck with the old, or pretty similar, for some time to come.

We have gorged ourselves for more than a century on the energy equivalent of a free lunch. As we start to realise that, while there may be such a thing as a free lunch, it isn't necessarily dinner and breakfast too, we can size up the alternatives, the most striking thing about which is their diversity.
Only coal and nuclear fission are potential candidates for maintaining the uniform and monolithic energy network we have now in the developed world. There are good reasons to avoid both, if we can - some would argue that we cannot.

All the alternatives involve a mix of technologies and energy sources, with energy not always being produced where you want and when you want, thus producing a far more complex system than we have now. The phrase 'intelligent grid' is often held up as an example of how this complexity will operate, with buying, selling and saving of energy being possible at many scales. I'd rather do away with the 'grid' word altogether because it evokes the electricity grid that we in the developed world generally take for granted but which exists only as a consequence of our historical dependence on fossil fuels, and is grossly inefficient. In a mixed-energy-source scenario, the traditional grid would be challenged by localised generation, the form of which would vary according to location - Saudi: sunshine; Greenland: geothermal.

The gridless or localised grid scenario begs the question of how large amounts of energy will be transferred from one place to another, which will no doubt continue to be either required or an economically viable activity. The classic answer is hydrogen, but it is unfortunately a lousy way to transport energy, thanks largely to its volatility. In theory, the development of cheap, high-load superconducting cables - perhaps made of carbon nanotubes - might keep the old-fashioned grid alive but it seems to me that an efficient means of converting whatever energy source happens to be available to you into a fuel that is liquid, or close to it, at room temperature - e.g. methanol -, combined with a fuel cell technology to make good use of it, would be a hard system to beat when it comes to storage and transmission.

As I write, there are at least a few scientists around the world trying to figure out ways to outdo Mother Nature in turning sunlight into a compact, transportable energy source. All of which happens, of course, on the nanoscale.

Thank you Paul!

Monday, February 12, 2007

Innovation - a hybrid connection between old practices?

Humberto Schwab, Director Club of Amsterdam, Innovation Philosopher, Moderator of the Club of Amsterdam LABs in Girona near Barcelona, Spain

Club of Amsterdam:
Humberto - you are an Innovation Philosopher - most people hardly see a connection between philosophy and daily life and even less between philosophy and business. What is the added value? Why has philosophy something to say?

Philosophy is the body of experimental and theoretical knowledge collected and shared by humanity since the invention of this specie. It is the richest fountain of wisdom about our selves as human beings, our needs and aspirations, our world outside and inside us and most of all about our values.

In philosophy we investigate falsehood and truth, the permanent and the temporarily, good and bad acting, good government and bad societies, beautiful and ugliness.

Most of all we have gathered wisdom about the quality of life. We try to make our daily life every day an experience of quality. At least many people try to reach this. This striving for quality is what connects our life with philosophy. Essential in our daily life is that we have our eyes wide open to see the right elements in their right relation; this is where philosophical methods are. We need to get rid of prejudice and false presumptions.

In business – more and more – the essence lies in the ability in enhancing the quality of life, in part or as a whole. This quality is related to issues of ethical policy and sustainable business. Sustainable is not only a matter of the natural environment, more and more we realize that sustainability concerns the quality of our communities. The pursuit of the good life is more and more the frame in which innovation in the experience economy is moving.

Last but not least, philosophy contains all the possible concepts, approaches, notions and strategies to frame productive ways of reasoning. Innovation is essential the rethinking of tradition, tradition as recipes for life. Taking traditional steps over again leads to new insights.

That is why innovation is often a hybrid connection between old practices.

Innovation sometimes demands new paradigms; philosophy is the producer of new paradigms.


You have been involved in large-scale educational programs. Can you give us an example of what you did and what the outcome was?

We managed to position philosophy in the official juridical structure of the secondary school system in the Netherlands. This old philosophy was recognized as one of the strongest innovation in Holland. I designed a complete program for the schools. A big innovation was the transformation of 100 excellent Dutch teachers from different disciplines into real Socratic teachers. That means wise people who put forward the right questions and not the answers.

At the moment I am involved in fundamental innovations of education in the Netherlands and in Spain.

In our society of the future learning is a value as such. This demands a totally different perspective on education and schooling. In an i-society learning has a different place then in the past hierarchical society. We need business, ngo-s, academies, citizen’s organisations and local government to co-create a challenging learning landscape in Europe.


In your EuroLab you use a special combination of techniques - some have been widely used in industries. Can you tell us why you choose them and how you adapt them to your projects?

The most used techniques are used instrumental while I always want to work in dialogues. A dialogue involves the total presence and commitment of the individual as reflective being. This means maximal awareness and maximal responsibility.

We cannot oppose general techniques on humans, without losing their individual strength. The Appreciative Inquiry method is very strong dialogue method in business, especially when - like the present situation - the relations between the stakeholders become totally different. The Appreciative Inquiry (AI) bring to light all the hidden good practices and experiences of all the individuals involved, emerged from their personal life. The top down model of the expert above sending his missives down kills the experience wisdom present in the whole organization. This AI method is fruit of a bunch of scientific insight on the effects of positive psychological approaches.

The Socratic method I have adapted to learning situations in school and business is the strongest context I know. Fundamental in this method is the key role of the good question. Putting forward basic questions is the art of collaboration. It gives new air to breath new ideas. People hardly share basic questions, let alone basic assumptions. Yet they work in contexts as if they share assumptions, values and concepts. The deconstructing of a basic question and the reconstructing of a shared answer uses collective intelligence as a rich fountain and provokes strong bounding on crucial challenges. In the Socratic discourse, the philosophical tradition serves as a support system, it helps to articulate good intuitions, good arguments and good ideas of all the participants. The Socratic chair (trained philosopher) represents the tradition and embodies it in a supportive way for each participant.

In a Socratic discourse the group transform in a natural way into a reflecting body that emerges a higher intelligence and a higher responsibility. It exercises human collectively at his best. It has strong rules that forces people to rethink other positions and to rehearse steps in thinking taken by others, it forces people to listen and repeat and to clarify all concepts used. The strong authoritative way of safeguarding the rules by the Socratic chair, gives rise to a real strong participation of all in an egalitarian way.

The strong relation between flourishing business and democratic cultures lies precise in the opportunity to put forward any valuable question of the quality of human life. The dialogue starts with the rethinking of standing practices and will virtualize new possible worlds and actions.
Good business ideas are in fact very often philosophical brainwaves!

More and more good business and good government are critically checked on qualitative grounds, from citizens perspectives.

From the Socratic brainstorms we have to come to a stage of productive planning. The future scenario methods are excellent in binding people on shared visions of the future and on shared actions to realize desired scenarios. Good dialogues generate an emergent intelligence that will give complete new frames and horizons. Yet scenarios without value dialogues are blind.
That is why in my EuroLABS the basic structure is the embedding of the personas in a value dialogue context. The revitalization of the basic existential questions generates an energy that also creates strong creative content.


I often hear that there has been enough talking and we should act now. Why do you put dialogue into the centre of your labs? And how does it relate to Do-Tanks?

There has definitely been enough talking, but then we talk about talking in the one-dimensional level we are used to do. Besides this talking is mostly discussions without any check of concepts, understanding of each other or reflections on principles or presumptions. This talking is often a chat between deaf people, they afterwards will follow their own routine in the way of thinking they were used to do.

The Club of Amsterdam LABs lead to a change in internal dialogue; people really need a strong dialogue with other beings to change their internal reflections and dialogues. This will directly lead to action, when you make shared action plans and design a sustainable dialogue with the stakeholders. To shift from a money driven society to a value driven society needs a new way of talking: the real human dialogue.

Action is always for a crucial part guided thinking or unconscious frameworks of meaning. The Socratic dialogues make sharing intelligent action possible.


Club of Amsterdam LABs:

LAB on Old and New ENERGY
An immersed experience of a Do-Tank
April 17 & 18, 2007
Early Bird registration till March 9th!
Location: Girona near Barcelona, Spain
http://www.clubofamsterdam.com/event.asp?contentid=655
Moderated by Humberto Schwab, Director, Club of Amsterdam, Innovation Philosopher
With the Thought Leaders
Nathalie Horbach, Centre for Energy, Petroleum and Mineral Law and Policy, University of Dundee, UK
Simon Taylor, Director and Co-Founder, Global Witness, UKChristof van Agt, International Energy Agency, FrancePaul Holister, Nanotechnology & Energy, France

LAB on MEDIA and Human Experience
An immersed experience of a Do-Tank
May 29 & 30, 2007
Early Bird registration till March 16th
Location:
Girona near Barcelona, Spain
http://www.clubofamsterdam.com/event.asp?contentid=657

Moderated by Humberto Schwab, Director, Club of Amsterdam, Innovation Philosopher
With the Thought Leaders
Laurence Desarzens, urban communicator, beatmap.com
Paul F.M.J. Verschure, ICREA research professor, Technology Department, University Pompeu Fabra
Ricardo Baeza-Yates, Director, Yahoo! Research Rudy de Waele, Founder, M-trends.org